Gen Y vs Gen Z: Generational Differences in English Slang Types and Perceived Use of Slang on Social Media
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.922ILEIID0024
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/22 | Page No: 230-243
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-22
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-10-22
Abstract
This study explored the slang usage of Generation Y and Generation Z, focusing on slang types and the perceived use of English slang on social media, and examined the significant mean difference in slang usage between the two generations. It employed a causal-comparative design to compare the generational differences between Generation Y and Generation Z, utilizing central tendency and independent sample t-test methods. A convenience sampling method was used to select employees to represent the two groups from one private company. The findings indicate that Initialism is the most prevalent slang type among both Gen Y and Gen Z, with Gen Y showing broader engagement in nuanced forms and Gen Z favouring concise expressions. Perceptions of slang use were generally positive, with Gen Z viewing it as a more effective and socially empowering communicative tool than Gen Y. These results highlight a clear generational gap in both usage patterns and attitudes toward English slang in digital contexts. The study advances insights into generational language practices in online communication on slang to enhance engagement, identity expression, and social connection in digital environments.
Keywords
slang types, perceived use, generational difference, Gen Y, Gen Z
Downloads
References
1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Budiasa, I. G., Weddha Savitri, P., & Shanti Sari Dewi, A. A. Sg. (2021). Penggunaan bahasa slang di media sosial. Humanis, 25(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2021.v25.i02.p08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Charkova, K.D. (2007). A language without borders: English slang and Bulgarian learners of English. Language Learning, 57(3), 369-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00420.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chumok, T., & Lerdpaisalwong, P. (2025). Creative language of English internet slang on Twitter. Journal of Language and Culture, 44(1), 43–60. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student's guide. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dixon, S. J. (2024, May 2). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of April 2024, by age group. Statista. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dwivedi, A., & Lewis, C. (2021). How millennials’ life concerns shape social media behaviour. Behaviour and Information Technology, 40(14), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1760938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North Carolina Press. Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility:A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility:A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In explaining communication contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Giancaterino, C. (2023). Gen Z vs. Millennials: How to target both audiences. Five CRM. https://www.fivecrm.com/blog/marketing-to-gen-z-vs-millennials/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. González, V. P. V., & Chang, Y. H. (2024). Social media as a hindrance to the writing skills of English learners. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 12056–12069. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i3.11322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Grau, S., Kleiser, S., & Bright, L. (2019). Exploring social media addiction among millennial students. Qualitative Market Research, 22(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2017-0058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management theory: Current status. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication (pp. 8–58). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gusnayetti. (2021). The impact of slang among youth on Indonesian language. Encyclopedia Social Review, 3(3), 275–281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hendrajati, E., Zahrok, S., Subali, E., Agustin, D. S. Y., & Wahyuddin, W. (2023). The impact of slang usage on Indonesian from a sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Development Research, 7(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v7i1.302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Herd Digital. (2024). Facebook statistics you must know in 2024. Herd.Digital. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Jeresano, M., & Carretero, M. (2022). TikTok talk: Platform-specific slang and generational identity. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(4), 11–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Karimah, S. A. (2021). English used on social media among Indonesian netizens: Sociolinguistics approach. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Riset Sosiologi, 2(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.47776/mjprs.002.02.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Li, M., & Jing, J. (2018). Millennials’ online social interaction engagement and its impact on emotions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lutfiah, Y., Septiani, E., & Syah Putra, A. (2024). A study of semantic shift (slang) in English language. Variable Research Journal, 1(2), 784–789. https://variablejournal.my.id/index.php/VRJ/article/view/114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lutviana, R., & Mafulah, S. (2021). The use of slang words in online learning context of EFL class. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i1.6118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. C. H. Beck. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mattiello, E. (2008). An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and sociology. Polimetrica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Neshkovska, S. (2020). The anti-language in the English as a foreign language curriculum. Respectus Philologicus, 37(42), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2020.37.42.38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ogheneakpobor, E. (2023). The morphology and effect of SMS/social media habituation on the spelling patterns of some secondary students in Delta State, Nigeria. Kampala International University Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1) https://doi.org/10.59568/kijhus-2024-4-1-08. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Olobia, L. P. (2024). Utilizing social media in communicating in English as a second language. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 15(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.37237/150103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Padohinog, E. C., Abenir, M. A., Llagas, R. O., & Gonzalvo, R. P. (2020). Knowledge and perceptions towards Internet slang of the grade 9 students in General Emilio Aguinaldo National High School. SDCA Journal of Education, 5, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pedro, J. C. (2022). The influence of straight outta Compton’s slang on daily conversation of college students. English Journal, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pew Research Center. (2023). Teens, social media and technology 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/11/15/teens-social-media-and-technology-2023/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Pongsapan, N. P. (2022). An analysis of slang language used in English students’ interaction. Jurnal Onoma Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 8(2),917–9244. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma. v8i2.2359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Prayudha, J., & Pradana, A. (2023). The analysis of slang words in English online learning classroom. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 4(1),18–33. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v4i1. 4885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Rezeki, T. I., & Sagala, R. W. (2019). Semantics analysis of slang (SAOS) in social media of the millennial generation. Jurnal Kredo, 3(1), 36–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Rusfandi, E. K. (2020). The use of slang on EFL students’ Instagram statuses: Do they perceive it as essential? Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 542, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Saputra, L., & Marlina, L. (2019). An analysis of slang words used by Instagram account Plesbol. English Language and Literature, 8(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i3.105802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Sardiyah, N. (2020). Pengaruh bahasa gaul terhadap penggunaan bahasa Indonesia mahasiswa UNS 2019. [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of Communication Accommodation Theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2014.11679160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Silalahi, D. (2023). Social media slang and generational language change in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Language Studies, 11(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Vacalares, S. T., & Cagalawan, A. L. (2023). The intelligibility of internet slang between Millennials and Gen Zers. International Journal of Scientific Research and Applications, 11(4), 456–465. https://ijsra.net/sites/default/files/IJSRA-2023-0456.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Za, D. R., Wicaksono, A., Purnamawati, N., Ajeng, G. D., Maximilian, A., & Hejash, M. (2023). Slang as a medium of communication for adolescents in social interaction between others. Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistic, 4(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. In J. M. Bennett (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 95–108). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study