The Kampong Spirit: Sociology in Singapore

This article offers a compelling sociological analysis of the kampong as a site of community, cultural pluralism, and social cohesion, arguing that while modern urban development in Singapore has significantly transformed these traditional spaces, the underlying values of the "kampong spirit" have not been entirely lost.
The article is theoretically robust, drawing on three major sociological frameworks: Functionalism (Émile Durkheim), Conflict Theory (Karl Marx), and Symbolic Interactionism (George H. Mead and Erving Goffman). This multi-theoretical approach allows for a nuanced interrogation of how the kampong once served as a cohesive social unit, how its dissolution reflects broader class and power struggles, and how meaning is negotiated in everyday interactions within both traditional and modern urban settings.
By linking these theories to the evolving aspects of community, governance, economic life, and cultural practices in Singapore, the article bridges macro-level structures and micro-level experiences. It also contributes to wider academic conversations on urbanization, postcolonial development, multiculturalism, and the transformation of informal social networks.
Importantly, the essay does not romanticize the kampong, but critically examines its historical role and its symbolic function today. This approach lends itself to comparative analysis with other societies experiencing similar transitions from traditional communal living to state-managed urban environments.

Sociology, Cultural Pluralism, Community Erosion, Cultural Revolution

1. Chua. (2014). Retrieved from https://search.catalog.loc.gov/search?option=lccn&query=94039923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Yeoh, K. &. (2003). Retrieved from https://search.worldcat.org/title/1065265032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Goh, C. T. (1999). Retrieved from https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/record-details/773bbd69-115d-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kymlicka. (1995). Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/book/4528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Parekh. (2000). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146879680100100112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Park.(1928).Retrievedfrom https://www.academia.edu/29709060/Human_Migration_and_the_Marginal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zaccheus,M.(2015,February15).Retrievedfrom https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/housing/singapores-last-remaining-kampung-losing-rustic-appeal-amidst-improvement-works [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Putnam. (2000). Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-01469-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Putnam. (2007). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bourdieu.(1984).Retrievedfrom https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Pierre_Bourdieu_Distinction_A_Social_Critique_of_the_Judgement_of_Taste_1984.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bourdieu.(1986).Retrievedfrom https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Oldenburg,R.(1989).Retrievedfrom [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://raggeduniversity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/1_x_ThegreatgoodplaceRayOldenburg2nded.-NewYork-compressed.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chua.(2014).Retrievedfrom https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203033722&type=googlepdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mathews. (2018). Retrieved from https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/study-of-social-capital-in-singapore.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tönnies, F. (1887). Retrieved from https://germanhistory-intersections.org/en/knowledge-and-education/ghis:document-163.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. CambridgeUniversityPress.(2001).Retrievedfrom https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/61198/frontmatter/9780521561198_frontmatter.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Goh. (1999). Retrieved from https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/1999082202.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Singapore Kindness Movement. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.kindness.sg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. NParks. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.nparks.gov.sg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ting, W. P. (2024, August 2). Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/st-explains-what-is-the-ethnic-integration-policy-and-how-does-it-work [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wellman, R. &. (2012). Retrieved from https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/2187/NetworkedThe-New-Social-Operating-System [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Durkheim.(1893).TheDivisionofLabourinSociety.Retrievedfrom https://durkheim.uchicago.edu/Summaries/dl.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Durkheim. (1895). Retrieved from https://durkheim.uchicago.edu/Summaries/rules.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Durkheim. (1897). Retrieved from https://www.gacbe.ac.in/images/E%20books/Durkheim%20-%20Suicide%20-%20A%20study%20in%20sociology.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Durkheim.(1922).Retrievedfrom https://open.oregonstate.education/sociologicaltheory/chapter/education-and-society/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Durkheim. (1925). Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.234325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Marx,K.(1848).Retrievedfrom https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=The+Communist+Manifesto+(1848)+karl+marx&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Marx, K. (1867). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Marx.(1844).Retrievedfrom https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Marx. (1850). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/class-struggles-france/index.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Marx. (1845). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Marx.(1844).Retrievedfrom https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Council for Board Diversities. (2023). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://www.councilforboarddiversity.sg/resources/latest-statistics/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Marx. (1845). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Marx. (1850). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/class-struggles-france/index.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lee. (2000). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/SingaporeMatters/posts/mr-lee-kuan-yew-once-said-that-hed-rather-have-the-best-talents-in-the-world-rig/2636153166471060/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yenn, T. Y. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ethosbooks.com.sg/products/this-is-what-inequality-looks-like [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kung, O. Y. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/parliament-do-not-lose-faith-in-meritocracy-says-education-minister-ong-ye-kung [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mead. (1934). Retrieved from http://tankona.free.fr/mead1934.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Blumer. (1969). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://books.google.com.sg/books/about/Symbolic_Interactionism.html?id=HVuognZFofoC&redir_esc=y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Goffman. (1959). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. https://monoskop.org/images/1/19/Goffman_Erving_The_Presentation_of_Self_in_Everyday_Life.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Biblio Asia. (2011, Jan). Retrieved from https://biblioasia.nlb.gov.sg/vol-6/issue-4/jan-2011/singapore-multiculturalism-plurality-solidarity/?utm_source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Velayutham, S. (2015). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. https://freotopia.org/readingroom/asiancs/Raj/notes.html?utm_source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Charlotte. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/symbolic-interaction-theory.html?utm_source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Loh, R. (2019, September 19). Retrieved from https://www.todayonline.com/news/young-people-spend-more-3-hours-social-media-daily-depression-anxiety-stress-imh-study-2481741?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Carballo, J. (2024, November 12). Retrieved from https://theindependent.sg/rising-digital-addiction-among-youth-in-singapore-sparks-concern-over-mental-health/?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ting, W. P. (2019, July 27). Retrieved from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/big-read-dangers-lurk-youths-chase-social-media-likes-4632086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Cherry, K. (2024, March 22). Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/impression-management-8619231?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. ResearchGate. (2018). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308627341_The_Materiality_of_Impression_Management_in_Social_Media_Use_A_focus_on_Time_Space_and_Algorithms?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Thompson, C. (2018, September 18). Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/wired25-social-media-honesty-mr-know-it-all/?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Toh. (2023). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2826095905?utm&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Co, C. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/pink-dot-calls-acceptance-and-equality-lgbtq-community-1329326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Jeraldine. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.jeraldinephneah.com/elitism-in-singapore/?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Koh, A. (2014). Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767724.2014.888308?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Teng, A. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/bursting-social-class-bubbles?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Putnam, R. D.-'. (2000). 'Bowling Alone'. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-01469-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Mead. (1934). Retrieved from http://tankona.free.fr/mead1934.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study