Empowering Digital Women: Overcoming Challenges in Bangladesh’s E-Commerce Landscape

This study examines the types of support that women entrepreneurs require to overcome business challenges, particularly in Facebook commerce (e-commerce), focusing on respondents from Rangpur and Dinajpur districts in Bangladesh. Using both open- and closed-ended questions, data were collected from 300 women entrepreneurs. The findings highlight nine key supports identified by respondents: stopping online harassment (87%), government-arranged training (85%), family support (81%), recognition of hard work (78%), support from NGOs and private sectors (70%), improved network speed (67%), removal of patriarchal attitudes (60%), simplified trading license procedures (52%), and government-provided loans (47%).
Reliability testing, using Cronbach’s Alpha (α = 0.739), confirmed adequate internal consistency across the nine-item scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were conducted, yielding a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.650 and a significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (p < .001), verifying the dataset’s suitability for factor analysis. PCA identified three principal components, cumulatively explaining 68.7% of the variance. These results suggest that the support needed by women entrepreneurs clusters around structural, institutional, and socio-cultural factors.
Despite strengths such as a large sample size and inclusion of diverse socio-demographic groups, the study faced limitations in terms of time, funding, and geographic coverage. Some women entrepreneurs could not be reached due to logistical and relational constraints.
The study recommends actions such as government and private sector training initiatives, stricter regulation against online harassment, simplification of licensing procedures, and greater family and societal support. Facebook and other digital platforms are also encouraged to take proactive steps to curb online abuse. Empowering women in e-commerce requires collaborative efforts across individual, community, and policy levels to address systemic barriers and promote digital entrepreneurship.

socio-demographic groups, the study faced limitations in terms of time, funding, and geographic coverage

1. Brush, C. G., Carter, N. M., Gatewood, E. J., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2006). Growth-oriented women entrepreneurs and their businesses. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A.-M. (2015). From ‘gender equality and women’s empowerment’ to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Singer, D. (2013). Financial inclusion and legal discrimination against women: evidence from developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Donner, J., Verclas, K., & Toyama, K. (2008). Reflections on MobileActive08 and the M4D Landscape. The Information Society, 24(3), 177–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Goetz, A. M., & Gupta, R. S. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Digital technologies and gender justice in India. IT for Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hisrich, R. D., & Brush, C. (1984). The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22(1), 30–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jamali, D. (2009). Constraints and opportunities facing women entrepreneurs in developing countries: A relational perspective. Gender in Management, 24(4), 232–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mahmood, R., & Hanafi, N. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance of women-owned SMEs in Malaysia. Competitive Advantage Journal, 8(4), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mayoux, L. (2001). Tackling the down side: Social capital, women’s empowerment and micro-finance in Cameroon. Development and Change, 32(3), 435–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Parvin, G. A. (2021). Exploring Women Entrepreneurs in E-commerce: A Bangladesh Perspective. Journal of Social Business, 12(2), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Roomi, M. A., & Parrott, G. (2008). Barriers to development and progression of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 59–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UN Women. (2020). Online and ICT-facilitated violence against women and girls during COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper