Tech-Powered Dreams: Unveiling Women’s Aspirations in Technology Entrepreneurship in India
Authors
International Conference on Emerging Markets (ICEM), 2026 (India)
International Conference on Emerging Markets (ICEM), 2026 (India)
International Conference on Emerging Markets (ICEM), 2026 (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10190043
Subject Category: Entrepreneurship
Volume/Issue: 10/19 | Page No: 496-506
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-18
Accepted: 2026-01-19
Published: 2026-02-16
Abstract
The contemporary landscape of technology and entrepreneurship necessitates a comprehensive understanding of women’s career aspirations to foster inclusive economic growth and innovation-driven development. This study investigates the technology-related entrepreneurial aspirations of young Indians (N = 3,500; aged 18–30 years) using primary survey data collected across 20 Indian cities in 2019, segmented by gender and city type (metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan). A descriptive-analytical research design was employed, integrating Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) with comparative statistical analysis to examine gender-based and geography-based variations in career preferences across two technology domains: Information Technology (IT) roles and technology entrepreneurship. The findings reveal statistically significant gender disparities, with male respondents exhibiting higher interest in IT careers such as app development and system analysis (M = 34%, F = 20%), while female respondents demonstrated proportionally stronger inclination towards technology entrepreneurship in non-metropolitan settings (Non-Metro: 13%, Metro: 5%). Additionally, geographical location was found to moderate aspirational patterns, with metropolitan respondents showing greater orientation towards specialised IT roles and non-metropolitan respondents displaying broader entrepreneurial interest. These results are situated within a conceptual framework linking gender socialisation theory, digital divide literature and entrepreneurial ecosystem research. The study contributes to the discourse on gender equity in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) entrepreneurship and offers implications for policymakers, educators and industry stakeholders seeking to cultivate inclusive technology ecosystems.
Keywords
Women Entrepreneurship; Technology Career Aspirations
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal, R., & Dhar, V. (2014). Big data, data science and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 443–448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahamad, T., Sinha, A., & Shastri, R. K. (2016). Women empowerment through skills development & vocational education. SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation, 2(2), 76–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ashcraft, C., McLain, B., & Eger, E. (2016). Women in tech: The facts. National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Biney, I. K. (2023). Adult education and entrepreneurship: Getting young adults involved. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00277-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Botha, M. (2020). Prior entrepreneurial exposure and action of women entrepreneurs. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bulsara, H. P., Chandwani, J., & Gandhi, S. (2014). Women entrepreneurship and innovations in India. International Journal of Innovation, 2(1), 32–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Canning, J., Broder, A., & Lafore, R. (2022). Data Structures & Algorithms in Python. Addison-Wesley Professional. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cerrato, J., & Cifre, E. (2018). Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01330 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Da Poian, V., et al. (2023). Exploratory data analysis machine learning approaches. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1134141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Dauth, T., Schmid, S., Baldermann, S., & Orban, F. (2023). Attracting talent through diversity at the top. European Management Journal, 41(1), 9–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Galsanjigmed, E., & Sekiguchi, T. (2023). Challenges women experience in leadership careers. Merits, 3(2), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3020021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Graves, J. M., Abshire, D. A., Amiri, S., & Mackelprang, J. L. (2021). Disparities in technology and broadband internet access across rurality. Family & Community Health, 44(4), 257–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gupta, S., & Aggarwal, A. (2015). Opportunities and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs in India. Journal of Business and Management, 17(8), 69–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gupta, V. K., Goktan, A. B., & Gunay, G. (2014). Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: A stereotype threat perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 273–288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Guthridge, M., Kirkman, M., Penovic, T., & Giummarra, M. J. (2022). Promoting gender equality: A systematic review of interventions. Social Justice Research, 35(3), 318–343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jan, S. Q., Junfeng, J., & Iqbal, M. B. (2023). Examining factors linking the intention of female entrepreneurial mindset. Heliyon, 9(11), e21820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Jennings, J. E., & Tonoyan, V. (2022). Research on gender stereotyping and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 12(3), 187–212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kumari, K., & Yadav, S. (2018). Linear regression analysis study. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 4(1), 33–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kuschel, K., Ettl, K., Díaz-García, C., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). Stemming the gender gap in STEM entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lall, S. V., Shalizi, Z., & Deichmann, U. (2004). Agglomeration economies and productivity in Indian industry. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2), 643–673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2013). Investment cycles and startup innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 403–418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. NASSCOM. (2019). Indian Tech Start-up Ecosystem: Leading Tech in the 20s. National Association of Software and Service Companies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Olsson, M., & Martiny, S. E. (2018). Does exposure to counterstereotypical role models influence girls’ and women’s gender stereotypes and career choices? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Owalla, B., Nyanzu, E., & Vorley, T. (2021). Intersections of gender, ethnicity, place and innovation. International Small Business Journal, 39(7), 681–706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Patel, R., & Parmentier, M. J. C. (2005). The persistence of traditional gender roles in the IT sector: A study of female engineers in India. Information Technologies & International Development, 2(3), 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Post, C., Lokshin, B., & Boone, C. (2021). Adding women to the C-suite changes how companies think. Harvard Business Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Rajvanshi, A. (2017). Women entrepreneurs in India: Challenges and opportunities. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 22(4), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Rana, R., & Singhal, R. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. Journal of Primary Care Specialties, 1(1), 69–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Rocha, V., & Grilli, L. (2023). Early-stage start-up hiring. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00818-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Rosales, R., León, I. A., & León-Fuentes, A. L. (2023). Recommendations for recruitment and retention of a diverse workforce. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 16(1), 346–361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Rosette, A. S., Ponce de Leon, R., Koval, C. Z., & Harrison, D. A. (2018). Intersectionality: Connecting experiences of gender with race at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sharma, V., & Gaur, M. (2020). Women entrepreneurs in India: A study of opportunities and challenges. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(7), 1307–1317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2021). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Tech Start-ups in India: Evolution, Structure and Role. Walter de Gruyter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sundarasen, S., Rajagopalan, U., Kanapathy, M., & Kamaludin, K. (2023). Women’s financial literacy: A bibliometric study. Heliyon, 9(12), e21379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Theaker, A. (2023). The Role of Mentoring for Women Entrepreneurs. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Tripathi, N., & Oivo, M. (2020). The roles of incubators, accelerators, co-working spaces, mentors and events in startup development. Fundamentals of Software Startups, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Tsakalerou, M., et al. (2024). The role of environment on women’s perception about their STEM studies. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in STEM: Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Waskom, M. L. (2021). Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Wei, X., Liu, X., & Sha, J. (2019). How does the entrepreneurship education influence the students’ innovation? Testing on the multiple mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1557. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Whitlock, K., et al. (2023). Mentorship in entrepreneurship: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1162904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
- Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
- Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
- Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
- Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper