Blended Learning in Higher Education: Lecturers’ Perceptions of Its Impact on Student Learning. A Case of the Midlands State University.

Blended learning has gained prominence in higher education over the past two decades, driven by rapid technological advancements and increasing demand for flexible, student-centred learning environments. This study examined lecturers’ perceptions of blended learning as a pedagogical approach for enhancing student learning at Midlands State University, Zimbabwe. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, the study adopted a qualitative phenomenological design to explore lecturers’ lived experiences with blended teaching practices. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with purposively selected lecturers who had experience implementing blended learning. Interviews were conducted using face-to-face interactions, telephone calls, and WhatsApp platforms. The data were analysed thematically following the procedures proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006).The findings indicate that lecturers generally perceive blended learning as beneficial in supporting student learning through enhanced flexibility, improved access to learning resources, and opportunities for personalised instruction and skills development. Lecturers also acknowledged increased student engagement and learner autonomy associated with blended learning approaches. However, these positive perceptions were tempered by significant challenges, including unstable internet connectivity, limited access to digital tools, and increased lecturer workload. The study concludes that while blended learning holds considerable pedagogical value, its effectiveness is highly dependent on institutional conditions, lecturers’ digital competence, and sustained pedagogical support. The study recommends that universities invest in robust technological infrastructure, provide continuous professional development for lecturers, and introduce institutional support mechanisms such as teaching assistants to manage workload demands. Future research is encouraged to adopt mixed-methods approaches and include perspectives from ICT support staff across multiple universities to enhance contextual understanding of blended learning implementation in Zimbabwe.

Blended ,Learning ,Higher Education, Student ,Midlands

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2011). Emotional intelligence: Implications for personal, social, academic, and workplace success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 88–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81– 112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Murphy, R., Snow, E., Mislevy, J., Gallagher, L., Krumm, A., & Wei, X. (2014). Blended learning report. New York: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Utami, I. G. A. L. P. (2018). The effect of blended learning model on students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(22), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Vaughan, N. (2013). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 3(2), 247–264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education. Educational Research Review, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: JosseyBass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Graham, C. R. (2019). Current research in blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 5–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kamau, J., Njenga, A., & Wambui, T. (2018). Lecturers’ perceptions of blended learning in African universities. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education. Online Learning Journal, 21(3), 166–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Scherer, R., Teo, T., & Müller, M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of digital technology. Educational Research Review, 28, 100293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vaughan, N., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments. Athabasca University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study