Administrative Officers’ Role in School Operations and Instructional Leadership in Relation to Teachers’ Satisfaction
Authors
Misamis Universty, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100556
Subject Category: Educational Management
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 7203-7211
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-30
Accepted: 2026-02-04
Published: 2026-02-17
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of administrative officers’ roles in school operations and instructional leadership and their relationship to teachers’ satisfaction in selected public schools in the Division of Oroquieta City. Using a descriptive correlational research design, 120 teachers provided perceptions of administrative officers’ performance in resource management, human resource coordination, record keeping, policy implementation, curriculum development, teacher support, student monitoring, and learning environment creation. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s r. Findings revealed high perceptions of administrative effectiveness and instructional leadership, very high teacher satisfaction, and highly significant positive relationships between operational effectiveness and instructional leadership with satisfaction. It is concluded that strong administrative and instructional leadership positively enhances teacher satisfaction. It is recommended that administrative officers continue improving operational practices, provide ongoing professional development, recognize teacher achievements, and maintain supportive learning environments to sustain high teacher satisfaction and school performance.
Keywords
Administrative leadership, instructional leadership, public schools
Downloads
References
1. Adipat, S., & Chotikapanich, R. (2022). Sustainable development goal 4: An education goal to achieve equitable quality education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(6), 174–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ainin, J., Sappayani, A. V., Sarazain, K., & Cagape, W. (2024). The unseen burden: Unveiling the lived experiences of school principals in implementing educational policy. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities (IJRSS), 5(10), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akçay, K., Altinay, F., Altınay, Z., Daglı, G., Shadiev, R., Altinay, M., & Okur, Z. G. (2024). Global citizenship for the students of higher education in the realization of sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 16(4), 1604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bangoy, L. M., Dela Cruz, F. R., & Santos, J. A. (2025). Administrative coherence and school performance: A systems-based study of Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 18(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bertalanffy, L. von. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. De Guzman, J. M. R., & Astillero, J. A. (2025). Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers and their performance and job satisfaction. Educational Research (IJMCER), 7(3), 96– 133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. De Leon, J. A. V. (2024). Sustainability and curriculum studies in the Philippines. In SDGs in the Asia and Pacific Region (pp. 463–483). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gading, S. J. L. (2024). Instructional leadership practices of the school heads to improve teachers’ performance. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 5(6), 89–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hunduma, C. M., & Mekuria, Y. S. (2024). Multicultural education and global citizenship: Literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10), 2024223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Khushik, F. U. (2021). From education for sustainable development to high quality education (SDG 4): Challenges and prospects for Pakistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Malco, J. M. E. (2024). Leadership competencies and resiliencies of school administrators: Basis for improved organizational performance and governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Miramon, S., Kilag, O. K., Groenewald, E., & Barayuga, L. (2024). Teacher leadership in the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Philippines: Evaluating its impact on K–12 education reform. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(1), 162–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ocampo, D. J., & Buenviaje, J. (2024). Basic education in the Philippines. In International handbook on education in Southeast Asia (pp. 835–862). Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Ortega, S. L., & Salinas, R. E. (2024). Feedback loops in school management: A systems theory approach. International Journal of Educational Systems, 19(2), 101–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Polatcan, M. (2024). An exploration of the relationship between distributed leadership, teacher agency, and professional learning in Turkey. Professional Development in Education, 50(4), 789–803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ribó, I. (2024). From global citizenship to Anthropocene denizenship: The challenge to education for sustainable development. Critical Studies in Education, 65(1), 75–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Rivera, J. P. R., Sinsay-Villanueva, L. M. V., Tanyag, I. H., Berroya, J. D., Garcia, G. D. V., & Lim, V. L. (2025). Revitalizing the Philippine education system: Facilitating access and participation to in-service training (INSET) and teacher professional development (TPD). PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2025-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Saini, M., Sengupta, E., Singh, M., Singh, H., & Singh, J. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal for Quality Education (SDG 4): A study on SDG 4 indicators. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2031–2069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., Abu-Tineh, A., Al-Shaboul, Y. M., & Sellami, A. (2024). Teacher leadership and virtual communities: Unpacking teacher agency and distributed leadership. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15025–15042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Torres, A. C. (2024). Principals or agents? How state education agencies build trust to balance support and accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 60(2), 191–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Villanueva, A. A., Disu, S. S., & Villanueva, K. F. P. A. (2021). Assessing the school heads’ leadership in Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Open Access Library Journal, 8(11), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
- No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
- Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
- Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
- Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya