Assessing the Level of Community Participation in Constituency Development Fund (CDF) in Zambia: Empirical Evidence from Constituency-Level Implementation.

Community participation is a central pillar of Zambia’s decentralisation agenda and is formally embedded within the design and implementation of the Constituency Development Fund (CDF). This paper examines the nature, extent, and effectiveness of community participation in the implementation of CDF projects in selected constituencies. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study analysed quantitative data from 70 respondents alongside qualitative evidence from interviews with Ward Development Committee members, Councillors, Experts who manage CDF, and project beneficiaries. Descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Exploratory Factor Analysis were employed to examine participation patterns, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Findings indicate that community participation is strongest during project identification, with declining involvement during implementation and monitoring. While descriptive results indicate moderate satisfaction with engagement (mean = 3.54; SD = 0.96), inferential analysis shows that community participation does not have a statistically significant effect on successful CDF implementation (F = 0.594; p = 0.001). Qualitative findings attribute this gap to limited civic awareness, procedural participation, political interference, and weak technical capacity at the community level. The paper concludes that while community participation is institutionally recognised, it remains largely consultative and insufficient to influence implementation outcomes. Based on these findings, the study recommends institutionalising community participation across all stages of the CDF project cycle through strengthened civic education, capacity building for local actors, and enforceable accountability mechanisms to enable communities to exercise meaningful influence over implementation and monitoring processes.

Community participation; Constituency Development Fund; Decentralisation; Local Development; Zambia

1. Ahmed, E., Devarajan, S. and Khemani, S. (2025) Decentralisation, service delivery and citizen participation in Africa. World Development, 178, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afrobarometer (2025) Citizens’ engagement and decentralised governance in Africa. Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 89. Accra: Afrobarometer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arnstein, S.R. (1969) ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baskin, J. (2016) Community empowerment and local development outcomes. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Caritas Zambia (2017) An assessment of Constituency Development Fund implementation in Zambia. Lusaka: Caritas Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chinunga, P. and Chibomba, M. (2025) ‘Governance challenges in decentralised development financing in Zambia’, Multi Research Journal, 7(2), pp. 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001) Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hapompwe, C. (2020) ‘Community engagement and development communication in local governance’, Zambian Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), pp. 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Howard-Grabman, L. (2017) Power, participation and trust in community development. Washington, DC: USAID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kamau, R. (2015) ‘Community participation in the management of Constituency Development Funds’, Journal of Public Administration and Development, 35(3), pp. 205–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kilewo, E. (2015) ‘Challenges of participatory development in decentralised systems’, African Development Review, 27(2), pp. 164–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mansuri, G. and Rao, V. (2013) Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Matipa, E. (2019) ‘Decentralisation and community participation in Africa’, Journal of African Governance, 6(1), pp. 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mutale, M. (2025) CDF implementation and community accountability in Zambia. Lusaka: Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muyaloka, P. and Kachamba, J. (2024) ‘Political interference and local development outcomes in Zambia’, International Journal of Community Studies, 9(1), pp. 71–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nikkhah, H.A. and Redzuan, M. (2016) ‘Participation as a medium of empowerment in community development’, European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), pp. 60–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oates, W.E. (1972) Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Onyalo, P. (2024) ‘Citizen participation and decentralised budgeting in Africa’, African Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), pp. 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Phiri, D. and Chama, M. (2020) ‘Community oversight and CDF project performance in Zambia’, Zambian Journal of Development Studies, 5(2), pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Republic of Zambia (2021) Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic. Lusaka: Office of the Auditor General. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Republic of Zambia (2025) National budget address and CDF allocation framework. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ribot, J.C. (2002) Democratic decentralisation of natural resources: Institutional choice and discretionary power transfers in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Simutenda, L. (2019) ‘Participation and accountability in CDF projects in Zambia’, Journal of Local Governance, 4(1), pp. 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Smoke, P. (2015) Rethinking decentralisation: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), pp. 97–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Financial Availability and Its Influence on Women’s Economic Empowerment in Kakamega County, Kenya
• Transformative Rural Land Governance For Gender Empowerment In Ethiopia: The Case Of Amhara Regional State Rural Land Policy
• PNP Patrol Operations: Experiences, Aspirations, and Policy Insights
• Public Policies within Mexico´S Fourth Transformation (4T) and Their Communication Strategies: Influence on University Citizenship (Mexico, 2018–2024)
• Implementation of Good Governance and Government Transformation Programs in Local Authorities: A Case Study of Kelantan, Malaysia