Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification for Enhancing the Engagement of Secondary School Students in Learning Science

This study investigates the effectiveness of gamification in enhancing secondary school students’ interest and engagement in science learning. Gamification refers to an instructional approach that incorporates game elements, such as points, badges, and leaderboards, to enhance learners’ motivation and promote active participation. This study addresses the common issue of student disengagement in science education by examining how gamified learning strategies influence students’ involvement in the classroom. The primary objectives of the study are to examine students’ perceptions of gamification, compare engagement levels between male and female students, and analyze the relationship between the level of gamification and student engagement. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected through surveys administered to Form 4 science stream students at SMK Shah Alam. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used to interpret the data and identify significant patterns and relationships. Preliminary findings indicate that students generally have positive perceptions of gamification, suggesting that it is a well-accepted instructional approach. The results also reveal a positive correlation between the use of gamification and student engagement, indicating that higher levels of gamified elements are associated with increased student involvement in learning activities. In addition, the findings suggest no significant differences in engagement levels between male and female students. This study has important implications for educational practices and policy development, highlighting the potential of gamification to create more interactive and engaging science learning environments. To better understand the long-term effects of gamification on student engagement and academic achievement, future studies should adopt mixed-method approaches, employ longitudinal research designs, and examine its implementation across diverse educational contexts

gamification, interactive, student engagement

1. Ab Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U. R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s41239-018-0123-0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajri, A. S., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2025). TRENDS AND INSIGHTS OF GAMIFICATION IN LEARNING FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3), 524-535. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/EDP/article/download/47980/23131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al‐Rousan, A. H., Ayasrah, M. N., Khasawneh, M. A. S., Obeidat, L. M., & Obeidat, S. S. (2025). AI‐Enhanced Gamification in Education: Developing and Validating a Scale for Measuring Engagement and Motivation Among Secondary School Students: Insights From the Network Analysis Perspective. European Journal of Education, 60(3), e70153. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Ayasrah-3/publication/392863183_AI-Enhanced_Gamification_in_Education Developing_and Validating_a_Scale_for_Measuring_Engagement_and_Motivation_Among_Secondary_School_Students_Insights_From_the_Network_Analysis_Perspective/links/6855806bcdf1a35eb174610f/AI-Enhanced-Gamification-in-Education-Developing-and-Validating-a-Scale-for-Measuring-Engagement-and-Motivation-Among-Secondary-School-Students-Insights-From-the-Network-Analysis-Perspective.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Samarraie, H., Sarsam, S. M., Alzahrani, A. I., & Aldowah, H. (2025). Exploring sentiments and topics in Extended Reality learning environments: A comparative study. Plos one, 20(7), e0327311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Introduction to Quantitative Research. In Practice of Research Methodology in Civil Engineering and Architecture: A Comprehensive Guide (pp. 489-528). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baah, C., Govender, I., & Rontala Subramaniam, P. (2023). Exploring the role of gamification in motivating students to learn. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2210045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bogost, I. (2015). Why Gamification Is Bullshit. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications.http://com.appolearning.files.s3.amazonaws.com/production/uploads/uploaded_file/847cf8e7-b99d-4586-a565-32caf9d86f91/Bogost2WhyGamificationIsBS.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bouchrika, I., Harrati, N., Wanick, V., & Wills, G. (2021). Exploring the impact of gamification on student engagement and involvement with e-learning systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1244-1257.https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/432025/2/Wills_Jul_2019.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chans, G. M., & Portuguez Castro, M. (2021). Gamification as a strategy to increase motivation and engagement in higher education chemistry students. Computers, 10(10), 132. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/10/10/132/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cheong, C., Cheong, F., & Filippou, J. (2013). Using design science research to incorporate gamification into learning activities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://scholar.archive.org/work/ljajvo73grc37ke6y4jjy5b2yu/access/wayback/https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1156&context=pacis2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chou, Y. K. (2018). Points, badges, and leaderboards: The gamification fallacy. URL: https://yukaichou. com/gamification-study/points-badges-and-leaderboards-the-gamification-fallacy (дата обращения 07.11. 2021). https://yukaichou.com/gamification-study/points-badges-and-leaderboards-the-gamification-fallacy/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cohen, M. P. (2025). Stratified sampling. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 2704-2708). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392842252_Stratified_Sampling [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2181037.2181040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Huang, W. H. Y., & Soman, D. (2013). Gamification of education. Report Series: Behavioural Economics in Action, 29(4), 37. https://mybrainware.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Gamification-in-Education-Huang.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kenney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/HelenPatrick/publication/7352705_Sex_Differences_in_Math_Performance_The_Role_of_Children%27s_Approach_to_Schoolwork/links/0046352680b6624fe2000000/Sex-Differences-in-Math-Performance-The-Role-of-Childrens-Approach-to-Schoolwork.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. King, R. B. (2016). Gender differences in motivation, engagement and achievement are related to students' perceptions of peer—but not of parent or teacher—attitudes toward school. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 60-71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608016302254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Knutas, A., Ikonen, J., Nikula, U., & Porras, J. (2014, June). Increasing collaborative communications in a programming course with gamification: a case study. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 370-377). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2659532.2659620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Korlat, S., Kollmayer, M., Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Pelikan, E. R., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2021). Gender differences in digital learning during COVID-19: Competence beliefs, intrinsic value, learning engagement, and perceived teacher support. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 637776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637776/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Korpershoek, H., King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., Nasser, R. N., Ganotice, F. A., & Watkins, D. A. (2021). Gender and cultural differences in school motivation. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 27-51. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Sample size determination table. Educational and psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349118299_Sample_Size_Determination_Using_Krejcie_and_Morgan_Table/link/60215fb492851c4ed55b6bd8/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kuo, M., Browning, M. H., Sachdeva, S., Lee, K., & Westphal, L. (2018). Might school performance grow on trees? Examining the link between “greenness” and academic achievement in urban, high-poverty schools. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1669. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01669/pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Latpate, R., Kshirsagar, J., Gupta, V. K., & Chandra, G. (2021). Advanced sampling methods. Singapore: Springer. https://www.academia.edu/download/97563812/978-981-16-0622-9.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nadeem, T. B., Siddiqui, M., Khalid, M., & Asif, M. (2023). Distributed energy systems: A review of classification, technologies, applications, and policies. Energy strategy reviews, 48, 101096. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X23000469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nurhayati, N., & Fathurrohman, F. (2025). Gamification in school education: A systematic review of its effectiveness in improving student motivation and academic outcomes. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 2356-2368. https://www.journal.staihubbulwathan.id/index.php/alishlah/article/download/6516/2885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pratama, G. A. (2020). Students perception of gamification to promote classroom engagement and motivation in senior high school. Language Research Society, 1(1). https://www.academia.edu/download/112748158/578.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning?. Journal of educational psychology, 107(1), 170. https://www.academia.edu/download/97002323/a003725220230109-1-16n7g6l.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Roopa, S., & Rani. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society/JIOS : Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in human behavior, 69, 371-380. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321630855X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sugano, S. G. C., & Mamolo, L. A. (2021). The Effects of Teaching Methodologies on Students’ Attitude and Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1304711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Peçanha de Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 3. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Trenholm, S. (2023). Challenges and suggestions regarding the aesthetic experience of mathematics when teaching and learning fully online. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 3-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/27527263231166415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wismer, S. E., Dosse, L. A., & Barry, M. M. (2021, October). Evaluation of an Interactive Top Hat Text for Engaged Learning. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zaric, N., Roepke, R., Lukarov, V., & Schroeder, U. (2021). Gamified Learning Theory: The Moderating role of learners' learning tendencies. International Journal of Serious Games, 8(3), 71-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v8i3.438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study