Transactional Versus Transformational Leadership: Contrasting Their Impact on Employee Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance in the Private Sector

Authors

Sella Chisanga

Master’s Student, BALM, IDE, University of Zambia (Malawi)

Dr. Aminu Aliyu Wushishi

Assistant Professor, University of Zambia, Lusaka (Malawi)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200066

Subject Category: Leadership

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 917-930

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-08

Accepted: 2026-02-13

Published: 2026-02-24

Abstract

Leadership is the practice whereby an individual pursues influence over others and empowers, stimulates, and supervises their tasks to help accomplish organizational or group goals. In private organizations such as banks, transactional and transformational leadership styles are frequently employed. Although they are used in these sectors, their impact on employee well-being is not known. Hence this study aimed contrasting impacts of transformational and transactional leadership on employee well-being. This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews to offer a comprehensive perspective. The findings show that transformational leadership is generally more effective in promoting positive employee wellbeing compared to transactional leadership. Transformational leadership, characterized by the leader’s ability to inspire and motivate employees, provide emotional support, and foster a shared vision, was found to enhance job satisfaction and work-life balance significantly. Conversely, transactional leadership, which emphasizes structure, clear expectations, and rewards and punishments for specific performance outcomes, presented a more nuanced impact on employee well-being and job satisfaction and its focus on performance targets and extrinsic rewards was associated with increased stress among employees. However, the study also highlights some limitations of transformational leadership, particularly regarding consistent emotional support suggesting areas for improvement. The study underscores combining transformational leadership with selected transactional elements could optimize employee well-being hence banks should prioritize transformational leadership training to develop a more engaged workforce, while selectively incorporating transactional elements such as clear communication and structured rewards to enhance job satisfaction and employee well-being. Future research might explore the long-term effects of blended leadership styles across various sectors to further support these findings. This study ultimately adds to the broader understanding of leadership’s role in shaping employee outcomes whilst emphasizing the importance of a balanced approach that enhances employee well-being.

Keywords

Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Psychological Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, Work-Life balance

Downloads

References

1. Abouraia, M. K., & Othman, S. M. (2017). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions: The direct effects among bank representatives. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7(4), 404- 423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alrowwad, A., Abualoush, S. H., & Masa’deh, R. (2020). Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2), 196–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Avolio, B. J. (2011). Full range leadership development (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De Simone, S. (2014). Conceptualizing well-being in the workplace. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12), 118-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Emon, M. M. H., Nipa, N. I., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). Customer Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobile Banking Applications Offered by Private Banks in Bangladesh. Socio Economy and Policy Studies, 3(2), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.26480/seps.02.2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). Assessing The Influence of Training and Skill Development Initiatives on Employee Performance: A Case Study of Private Banks in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Malaysian Business Management Journal, 2(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.26480/mbmj.02.2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jones, G., & George, J. (2016). Contemporary management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: Meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kalliath, T., & Brough, P. (2008). Work-life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(3), 323-327. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kokemuller, N. (2017). Importance of Leadership in Business. Chron. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(3), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Griffin, M. L. (2012). Being the good soldier: Organizational citizenship behavior and commitment among correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811433138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The 'what', 'why' and 'how' of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sunarsi, D., Paramarta, V., Munawaroh, A. R., Bagaskoro, J. N., & Evalina, J. (2021). Effect of transformational, transactional leadership and job satisfaction: Evidence from information technology industries. Information TechnologyIn Industry, 9(1), 987–996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Locke, E. A. (2001). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1297-1349). Chicago: Rand McNally [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles