Access Without Internet: Evaluating Offline E-Learning Models in Remote Primary Schools

This study examines the effectiveness of offline e-learning models in improving access to education in remote primary schools with limited or no internet connectivity. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative survey data from students and teachers with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews and classroom observations to provide a comprehensive evaluation of learning outcomes, engagement levels, and instructional practices. Probability sampling techniques ensured representative participation, while validated instruments with acceptable reliability coefficients supported data accuracy. Quantitative findings were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with confidence intervals, and qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and contextual challenges. The results indicate that well-designed offline digital resources enhance student participation, self-directed learning, and academic performance when supported by trained teachers and adequate infrastructure. However, limitations related to device availability, technical maintenance, and teacher preparedness remain significant barriers. The study highlights the importance of integrating pedagogical training, systematic monitoring, and policy support to strengthen offline e-learning implementation. These findings contribute to evidence-based strategies for reducing educational disparities and promoting inclusive learning in underserved rural and remote communities.

Offline e-learning; Remote primary schools

1. (2019). Offline and computer based e learning interventions for medical students’ education: A systematic review. Medical Education Online. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6456842/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. (2021). Is e learning for primary school students during the COVID 19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Development. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059321000085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., & Atobatele, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student performance and engagement: Systematic review. Education Journal Review. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217 024 00253 0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. De Bruijn Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon Educational Research. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024154709?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Faghir Ganji, M., Jafari Malvajerd, A., Moradi, A., Amanollahi, A., & Ansari Moghaddam, A. (2024). Teachers and managers’ experiences of virtual learning during the COVID 19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Heliyon, 10(2). Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402400149X?utm_source= (ScienceDirect) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lee, B. N. (2022). Face to face learning, teaching and learning at home need to go hand in hand. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(5). Retrieved from https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/1510?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lee, B. N. (2023). Hybrid and virtual learning: Bridging the educational and digital device. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1). Retrieved from https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/2035?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lee, B. N. (2025). Bridging cultures in history education: A comparative analysis of teaching methods in China and Malaysia’s universities. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 10(59). Retrieved from https://gaexcellence.com/ijepc/article/view/5659?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, B. N., Chai, W. L., & Abdullah, S. (2021). Smart learning improves student participation. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(4), 227–241. Retrieved from https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/738?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lee, B. N., Liang, L., & Cheng, H. (2025). Learning management systems and pedagogical innovation: Evidence from academic staff in China. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. Retrieved from https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/learning-management-systems-and-pedagogical-innovation-evidence-from-academic-staff-in-china/?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lee, B. N., Liang, L., Cheng, H., & Dongli, J. (2025). Institutional support and LMS implementation among academicians in vocational higher education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. Retrieved from https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/institutional-support-and-lms-implementation-among-academicians-in-vocational-higher-education/?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mays, T. J. (2024). Exploring offline e learning for resilience: A case study. Journal of Learning for Development. Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/1288/1055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rasmussen, K., Marcano Belisario, J., & Wark, P. (2019). Offline digital education for undergraduate health professions: A systematic review of impact on knowledge and skills. Journal of Global Health. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452290/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tadlaoui Brahmi, A., Çuko, K., & Alvarez, L. (2022). Digital citizenship in primary education: A systematic literature review describing how it is implemented. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291122001024?utm_source= (ScienceDirect) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tong, D. H., Bui, P. U., & Kim Ngan, L. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self study skills and learning attitudes. Heliyon Education Research. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36643330/?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computer Applications in Education. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000295?utm_source= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study