Comparative Effectiveness of Literacy Initiatives in Zimbabwe: ERI versus THRASS

Authors

Zirima Desline

Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education Chivi (Zimbabwe)

Dr Ndongwe Evershine

Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education Chivi (Zimbabwe)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200113

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 1511-1521

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-05

Accepted: 2026-02-10

Published: 2026-02-25

Abstract

This paper explores the comparative effectiveness of two literacy initiatives in Zimbabwe: The Early Reading Initiative (ERI) and the Teaching Handwriting, Reading, and Spelling Skills (THRASS) program. Given the critical importance of early literacy for lifelong learning and development, this study assesses each program's alignment with Zimbabwe's Heritage-Based Curriculum. Employing a desk study methodology, the analysis reviews policy documents, program manuals, and empirical studies to evaluate how effectively each initiative addresses linguistic diversity, cultural inclusivity, and scalability in diverse educational contexts. Findings indicate that while THRASS offers structured phonics instruction beneficial in urban areas, ERI's holistic approach integrating indigenous languages and community involvement emerges as the more effective model across varied socio-economic settings. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers, emphasizing the need for adaptable, culturally relevant literacy frameworks to enhance educational outcomes in Zimbabwe.

Keywords

Early literacy, Early Reading Initiative (ERI), Teaching Handwriting, Reading

Downloads

References

1. Blaikie, N. (2010). Designing social research (2nd ed.). Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chimhenga, S. (2020). The role of indigenous languages in education: A Zimbabwean perspective. Zimbabwe Journal of Language Studies, 7(1), 56-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dede, C. (2018). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Government of Zimbabwe. (2020). National Development Strategy 1 (2021–2025). Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Goodman, K. (1986). What's whole in whole language? Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Harris, J. R., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). Literacy criteria and standards: A synthesis of research and practice. Greenwood Publishing Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Johnston, S., & Watson, J. (2005). Teaching synthetic phonics. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing language: Multilingualism and the politics of the English language in Zimbabwe. Language Policy, 6(2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-007-9036-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2019). National assessment report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2023). Heritage-based curriculum framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ngara, R. (2018). Embracing multilingual education in Zimbabwe: Implications for policy and practice. Research in Education, 89(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717752121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UNESCO. (2016). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNICEF, & Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2018). Early Grade Reading Assessment report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, F. (2021). Exploring the role of digital technologies in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09957-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles