TEVET Curriculum Adaptations Responsive To Skills Development for Students with Visual Impairment in TEVET Institutions in Zambia

This study explored the responsiveness of Technical Education, Vocational and Entrepreneurship Training (TEVET) curriculum adaptations for students with Visual Impairment (VI) in Zambian institutions. Grounded in the Social Model of Disability and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework, the research investigated how current
Findings reveal that while localized adaptations such as strategic seating, task analysis, and improvised tactile materials are practiced, they are largely driven by individual lecturer initiative rather than systemic policy. Implementation is significantly hindered by a "Disability Gap" characterized by unsuitable infrastructure, a critical shortage of standardized assistive technology, and rigid academic timelines that fail to account for non-visual processing. The study concludes that for TEVET in Zambia to be truly responsive, there must be a transition from adhoc improvisations to formalized, well-funded inclusive standards. Key recommendations include the establishment of a National TEVET Inclusive Resource Fund, mandatory inclusive pedagogy training for instructors, and the adoption of competency-based modularization to provide the temporal flexibility required by learners with VI.

Curriculum, Curriculum adaptations, Skills Development, Responsiveness

1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 2(1), 5-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barraga, N. C., & Erin, J. N. (2001). Visual impairments and learning. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chipongoma, C., & Mwange, A. (2025). Methodological and philosophical approaches to social media marketing adoption studies: A review. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v6.i.1.16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chiti, J., & Musonda, A. (2021). Pedagogical training of TVET instructors in Zambia: Challenges and opportunities for inclusive education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 73(2), 145–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dixon, J. M. (2005). Multi-sensory methods in vocational training for the blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(11), 690–702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Training Foundation (ETF). (2020). Curriculum reform and modernization in vocational education and training: A guide for practitioners and policymakers. Turin, Italy: ETF Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hadjikakou, K., & Mnasonos, C. (2023). Teacher efficacy and the success of inclusive education for students with sensory impairments. International Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. (2016). Disability discourse: Overview and critiques of the medical and social models. Quest, 68(2), 193-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hatlen, P. (1996). The Expanded Core Curriculum for students with visual impairments, including those with additional disabilities. Review, 28(1), 25-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2018). Making TVET inclusive for persons with disabilities. Geneva: ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2020). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2020. Geneva: ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kalabula, D. M. (1991). Special education in Zambia: A historical review and future perspectives. Lusaka: UNZA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kalabula, D. M. (2007). Inclusive education in Zambia: Challenges and opportunities. Lusaka: UNZA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kandimba, H. C, Mandyata, J & Simalalo, M. (2023). Teachers’ Understanding of Curriculum Adaptation for learners with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities in Zambia. European Journal of Special Education Research, 9(1), pp 36-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kandimba, H.C, Kalimaposo, K, Mandyata, J, Bwalya, S, Kabwe, A & Kalunga, M. (2025). Increasing Accessibility to Inclusive Education for Learners with Disabilities in Primary Schools in Ndola District, Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 6741-6757. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kandimba, H.C, Kalimaposo, K, Mandyata, J, Bwalya, S, Kabwe, A & Kalunga, M. (2025). Exploring Pedagogical Approaches Used by Teachers for Learners with Intellectual Disabilities in Selected Schools of Luanshya District, Zambia. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 5(9), 873-888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook, M. C. (2000). Foundations of Education: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments. New York: AFB Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lamichhane, K. (2015). Disability, Education and Employment in Developing Countries: From Charity to Investment. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lewis, R. B., & Doorlag, D. H. (2011). Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lynch, P., Simalalo, M., Chataika, T., Hayhoe, S., Mbewe, K., Case, R., & her Majesty, G. (2021). Resource poverty and employability in vocational training for students with disabilities: A study of inclusive TVET in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(12), 1341–1358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mather, N. (2022). Environmental adjustments and the reduction of the "disability effect" in inclusive classrooms: Bridging the gap between the social and medical models. British Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 312–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. McLinden, M., & McCall, S. (2002). Learning through Touch: Supporting Children with Visual Impairment and Additional Difficulties. David Fulton Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ministry of Education (1996). Educating Our Future: National Policy on Education. Lusaka: Zambia Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ministry of Education (2016). Education Statistical Bulletin. Lusaka.Ministry of Education, Science, Vocational Training and Early Education (MESVTEE) (2013). Strategic Plan 2013-2016. Lusaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Munalula, M. (2020). Instructional access in Zambian TVET institutions for learners with disabilities. In M. N. Amutabi & L. H. Henry (Eds.), Global Dynamics in Africa (pp. 165–174). Centre for Democracy, Research and Development (CEDRED). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mutua, N. K., & Rono, R. K. (2017). Entrepreneurial skills development for visually impaired learners in Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Muzata, K.K. (2017). Curriculum implementation for learners with special education needs: the case of selected inclusive and special schools in Zambia. PhD Thesis, University of South Africa, http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/24571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Muzata, K.K. (2020). Complexities of sampling in special education research: a Zambian contextual analysis. European Journal of Special Education Research, 6 (3), 96 – 109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mwange, A., et al. (2023). Research methodology and design: Types, methods, tools and applications. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/14-14-01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mweene, C., & Mwange, A. (2024). A framework for effective transitioning of the Zambia’s Food Reserve Agency from a maize-centric model to a comprehensive strategic grain reserve in Zambia. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 5(4), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v5.i.4.15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mweene, C., & Mwange, A. (2025). An examination of factors contributing to the maize-centric procurement approach in Zambia: Case of the Food Reserve Agency. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v6.i.1.15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The New Politics of Disablement. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Republic of Zambia (1998). Technical Education, Vocational and Entrepreneurship Training Act (No. 13 of 1998). Lusaka: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Republic of Zambia (2012). The Persons with Disabilities Act (No. 6 of 2012). Lusaka: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Spungin, S. J. (2002). When you have a visually impaired student in your classroom: A guide for teachers. New York: AFB Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Terzi, L. (2004). The social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., Anderson, M. E., & Miller, N. A. (2023). Testing ability, not disability: Equitable assessment in vocational education and training for students with sensory impairments. Journal of Vocational Assessment and Inclusion, 14(2), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNESCO. (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020/1: Inclusion and Education: All Means All. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2019). Promoting Quality in TVET: Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Vocational Training. Bonn: International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (UNESCO-UNEVOC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. UNICEF. (2016). Governance and Resource Equity in Education for Eastern and Southern Africa: A Regional Analysis. Nairobi: UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Treaty Series, vol. 2515, p. 3. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. United Nations (2015). Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4): Quality Education.Zambia Qualifications Authority (ZAQA). (2018). Policy framework for skills mismatch and market relevance. Lusaka, Zambia: ZAQA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study