How Media Construct Time Management: A Linguistic Analysis (2020–2025)
Authors
MA Student in Linguistics, School of Foreign Languages, HSE University, Moscow, Russia Novikova V.P. (Russia)
Novikova V.P. Mohamand Raihanullah
Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages,K. G. (Russia)
Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (FCU) (Russia)
MA Student in Linguistics, School of Foreign Languages, HSE University Moscow (Russia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200189
Subject Category: Linguistics
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2505-2523
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-10
Accepted: 2026-02-16
Published: 2026-02-28
Abstract
This study investigates how English-language media linguistically construct the concept of time management through the use of metaphor and framing strategies during the period from 2020 to 2025. Adopting a mixedmethods qualitative discourse-analytical approach, the research examines a corpus of 25 media texts (approximately 48,000 words) drawn from influential outlets, including BBC, CNN, The Economist, Financial Times, The Guardian, and Harvard Business Review. These sources were selected to represent a range of journalistic genres, such as business journalism, lifestyle media, and professional advice discourse. The analysis combines the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) with frame-semantic analysis and systematic lexical classification to uncover recurring linguistic patterns in media representations of time.
The findings reveal four dominant metaphor families used to conceptualize time, namely TIME IS MONEY, TIME IS A RESOURCE, TIME IS A MOVING ENTITY, and TIME IS AN ENEMY. These metaphors are embedded within five recurring interpretive frames: productivity, urgency, self-optimization, wellness, and neoliberal responsibility. Together, these linguistic strategies contribute to the transformation of time from an abstract experiential dimension into a quantifiable, manageable, and morally charged resource. The study demonstrates that media discourse does not merely describe time management practices but actively shapes normative expectations regarding efficiency, responsibility, and self-discipline.
To illustrate the linguistic mechanisms underlying this transformation, the study proposes a conceptual model that distinguishes between the lexicon of time, the lexicon of time management, and their intersection, where hybrid expressions naturalize managerial approaches to temporal experience. The results contribute to media discourse studies, cognitive linguistics, and critical discourse analysis by providing a systematic account of how contemporary media participate in the ideological construction of time. The study also offers a theoretical foundation for future research on the relationship between language, media, and temporal perception in digitally accelerated societies.
Keywords
time management, media discourse, metaphor analysis, framing; MIPVU, productivity, neoliberal ideology
Downloads
References
1. Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2017). It’s about Time: New Perspectives and Insights on Time Management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31, 309-330. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. BBC News. (2021, May 21). Why time seems to be going faster while we are in lockdown. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200520-why-lockdown-life-feels-like-its-going-faster [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. BBC News. (2022, January 4). Is finding a ‘new normal’ in workplace impossible? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220104-future-of-work-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. BBC Worklife. (2023, July 18). The productivity trap: Are we managing time or is it managing us? BBC Worklife. http://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20230717-productivity-trap [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as enterprise: An essay on neoliberal life. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How languages construct time. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 333–341). New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bröckling, U. (2015). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. London, England: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The wellness syndrome. Cambridge, England: Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2007). A review of time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Davenport, T. (2020, November). Reimagining productivity in the age of remote work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/11/reimagining-productivity-in-the-age-of-remote-work [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Elias, N. (1992). Time: An essay. Oxford, England: Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London, England: Edward Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fleming, P. (2017). The death of homo economicus: Work, debt and the myth of endless accumulation. London, England: Pluto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Johnson, M. (2020, November 19). Remote work and the economics of time. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/remote-work-and-the-economics-of-time [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lazar, M. M. (2000). Gender, discourse and semiotics: The politics of parenthood representations. Discourse & Society, 11(3), 373–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. McGee, M. (2005). Self-help, Inc.: Makeover culture in American life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Miller, T. (2022, April 11). The urgency economy: Why everything now feels like a deadline. CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/business/urgency-economy-deadline [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rodriguez, S. (2024, February 6). How burnout reshaped our approach to time management. CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/business/burnout-time-management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification (MIPVU). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sullivan, C., & Smithson, J. (2007). Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 448–461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. The Economist. (2021, May 22). The new currency: How time became the most valuable asset. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2021/05/22/the-new-currency [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Wood, A. J., & Wood, D. (2019). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. New York, NY: Penguin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Wright, D. (2024, March 2). The efficiency mindset: Why companies measure time more closely than ever. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/efficiency-mindset-time-measurement [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Xu, Y., Zhang, M., & Li, W. (2024). Temporal metaphors in digital communication: Changing relationships to time in technology-saturated environments. Discourse & Communication, 18(2), 145–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
- Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
- Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
- Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
- Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising