Assessing the Reliability of Vertical Electrical Sounding as an Alternative to Standard Penetration Testing in Inaccessible Terrains

Authors

Abdul A. Koroma

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fourah Bay College, Mount Aureol, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone (Sierra Leone)

Victor S. Kamara

Department of Civil, Mining and Process Engineering, School of Engineering, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia (Sierra Leone)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200217

Subject Category: Engineering

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 2941-2949

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-12

Accepted: 2026-02-17

Published: 2026-03-02

Abstract

Site investigations are crucial for the safe design of foundations. This study evaluates the use of Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) to determine subsoil stratigraphy in inaccessible areas along a proposed transmission line grid, comparing the results with traditional Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) data. SPT and VES tests were conducted concurrently at three tower locations (TT – Bu – L9, TATA sites) to a non-refusal depth of 15m. Results from both methods correlated well, suggesting that VES is a reliable and efficient tool for geotechnical investigations in challenging terrains, which can improve the safety and cost-effectiveness of infrastructure development.

Keywords

SPT, resistivity, stratigraphy, transmission, VES

Downloads

References

1. Alile, O. M., Amadasun, C. V. O., and Evbuomwan, A. I. (2008). “Application of vertical electrical sounding method to decipher the existing subsurface stratification and groundwater occurrence status in a location in Edo North of Nigeria.” J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., 12(3), 67–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ampadu, S. I. K., Ayeh, F. F. J., and Boadu, F. (2018). “Deriving SPT N-values from DCP test results: The case of foundation design in a tropical environment.” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 36(4), 2517–2531. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmeti, M., and Ahmeti, H. (2024). “Field tests of soil properties under water tanks.” Open Civ. Eng. J., 18, e18741495261102. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bosch, D. R., and Sotelo, R. R. (2015). “Determination of stratigraphy—Soil types—Using Cone Penetration Test in sedimentary deposits in north-east of Argentina.” J. Geosci. Environ. Prot., 3(6), 134–139. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Omosanya, K. (2014). “A review of stratigraphic surfaces generated from multiple electrical sounding and profiling.” Geofizika, 31(1), 49–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Osman, M. O., and Osman, A. K. (2016). “Evaluation of Cone Penetration Test (Cpt) classification methods for some local soils.” www.researchgate.net (Accessed Jan. 26, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Sarker, D., and Abedin, M. Z. (2015). “Applicability of standard penetration test in Bangladesh and graphical representation of SPT-N value.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280572148_Applicability_of_Standard_Penetration_Test_in_Bangladesh_and_Graphical_Representation_of_SPT-N_Value (Accessed Jan. 26, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Thabit, J. M., Al-Banna, A. S., and Al-Awsi, M. D. (2015). “Using vertical electrical sounding in building sites investigation; A case study in south of Baghdad, Iraq.” Iraqi Bull. Geol. Mining, 11(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. van Overmeeren, R. A., and Ritsema, I. L. (1988). “Continuous vertical electrical sounding.” First Break, 6(10), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.1988017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Villalobos-Aragón, A., Espejel-García, V. V., Espejel-García, D., and Rivas-Lobera, L. (2019). “Shallow subsurface stratigraphy inferred from the use of vertical electrical soundings (VES) survey in central Chihuahua, Mexico.” Open J. Geol., 9(1), 1–11. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Yusof, N. Q. A. M., and Zabidi, H. (2018). “Reliability of using standard penetration test (SPT) in predicting properties of soil.” IOP Conf. Series: J. Phys.: Conf. Series, 1082, 012094. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles