Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Foster Critical Thinking in Zimbabwean Tertiary Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping educational strategies worldwide, with growing interest in its potential to cultivate critical thinking among students. Yet, limited research explores this within African higher education contexts. This study investigates how tertiary educators in three Zimbabwean institutions understand and implement AI tools to enhance critical thinking. Rooted in the interpretivist paradigm, the study employs qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews and open-ended surveys, to capture educators’ perceptions, strategies, and the challenges they encounter. Thematic analysis reveals that AI's effect on student thinking in Zimbabwean universities depends entirely on how lecturers use it. The critical thinking aspect emerged when lecturers required students to critique the ideas that they obtained through AI. Findings indicate that students were encouraged to compare AI outputs with credible sources, forcing them to evaluate authority, accuracy, and bias. Some lecturers failed to guide students on how to utilize AI effectively. Students without clear structure developed a complicated reliance on AI by failing to think for themselves. Lecturers observed a necessary shift in their own teaching and the students' cognitive roles. Most of them suggested that since AI is responsible for basic summarisation and information retrieval, classroom discussions could focus on application, analysis, and creation as indicated in the higher levels of Bloom's Taxonomy. Participants proposed capacity-building, contextualized digital content, and institutional support as key enablers. These findings highlight the promise of AI in advancing critical thinking but call for targeted interventions to realize its full potential. The study contributes valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and curriculum designers aiming to integrate AI in meaningful and sustainable ways.

Artificial intelligence, Higher education, Critical thinking, Pedagogical and Andragogical Approaches

1. Annamalah, S. (2024) 'The Value of Case Study Research in Practice: A Methodological Review with Practical Insights from Organisational Studies', Journal of Applied Economic Sciences (JAES), 19(4), pp. 485-498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babu Md.A., Yusuf, K.Md. E.L.N., Jaman, S.Md.S & Sharmin, Mst. R (2024). ChatGPT and generation “Z”: A study on the usage rates of ChatGPT. Elsevier. Social Sciences and Humanities. Open Volume 10, 2024, 10163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Casal – Otero, L, Catala, A., Fernandez-Morante, G., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S (2023). AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cotton, D.R.E., Cotton, P.A & Shipway, J.R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Pages 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crain, C., Ewing, A, A., Billy, I., Anush, H., (2024). The advantages and disadvantages of AI in higher education. Campbellsville University, Cambellsville KY, USA. The Business and Management Review, Volume 15 Number 3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J.W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications. 34(5), 67-91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dwivedi, Y.K., Pandey, N., Currie, W, & Micu, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence. (AI)based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry: practices, challenges and hospitality and research agenda. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 36(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Facione, P. A. (2023). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garg, N, Kaur, A., Ahmad, F., & Dutta, R., (2020). Augmenting Education: The Transformative Power of AR, AI, and Emerging Technologies. Wiley. Human Behaviour and Emerging Technologies. Volume 2025. Article ID 5681184, https://doLorg/10.1155/hbe2/5681184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giray, L. (2024). Ten Myths about Artificial Intelligence in Education. Higher Learning Research Communication, 14(2). DoI:10 70/hl. rcv41:1508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kahneman, D. (2018). Thinking Fast and Slow in AI. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kasneci, E., et al (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 03.10274.https://doi.org/0.06/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khlaif, Z.N., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M.A.A. & Sanmugam, M (2024) Factors Inflencing Educators’ Technostress while using Generative AI: A Qualitative study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2(2), 869-899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lin, C. C., Huang, A.Y, Q & Lu, O.H.T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/0.1186/s40561-02-00260-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson. https://static.google user content.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-nleashed-Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mandina, S. & Kusakara, R. (2025). The application of AI in Chemistry learning: Experiences of secondary school students in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.6.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morandin -Ahuema, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence versus Human Intelligence. What Essentially Makes Us Different. University of Puebla (BUAP). DOI:10.31219/0sf.io/d lomfs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nelson, A.S. Santaria, P.V., Javen, J. S & Ricaurte, M (2025). Educ.Sci. 15(5), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/edusci150506111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Obenza, B.N., Cabello, .H.S., Caangay, R.B.R., Makigod, T.E.C., Almocera, S.M., Bayno, J.L.M., Camposano, J.J.R., Cena, S.J.G., Garcia, J.A.K., Labajo, B.F.M., & Tua, A.G. (2024). Analyzing university students’ attitude and behaviour toward AI using the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model, American Journal of Applied statistics and Economics. (1), 99-108, https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.vil.510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Plata, S., De Guzman, M. A. & Quesada, A. (2023). Emerging research and policy themes on academic integrity in the age of Chat GPT and generative AI. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE). 19(4):12. pp.743-758, ISSNZ600-9749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York. The Viking Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sharma, S. et al., (2023) Artificial intelligence and the internet of things De Gruyter, Berlin [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stommel, J. (2021). Critical digital pedagogy: a definition. Hybrid Pedagogy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vygotsky, (1978). Mind in Society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Yan, M., & Su, Z. (2023). A survey on ChatGPT: AI-Generated Content, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society (Volume 4). DOI:10.1109/OJCS.2023.3300321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study