Exploring English Writing Motivation and Anxiety Among Undergraduate Students in a Public University

Authors

Amir Lukman Abd Rahman

Universiti Teknologi MARA,Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Wan Muhammad Fitri Wan Amir Nizam

Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan (Malaysia)

Muhammad Hariz Mohammad Hafiz

Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)

Muhammad Danish Haikal Shukor

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar Perak (Malaysia)

Nabilla Kusuma Vardhani

Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Universiti Teknologi MARA,Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Rasyiqah Batrisya Md Zolkapli

Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200242

Subject Category: English Literature

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3221-3241

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-19

Accepted: 2026-02-24

Published: 2026-03-04

Abstract

Writing is a core academic competency at the tertiary level, yet many undergraduates experience anxiety during writing, particularly in second‑language (L2) contexts where idea generation, organisation, and language control converge under evaluation pressures. At the same time, motivational beliefs such as self‑efficacy and task value are expected to support engagement and persistence in academic writing. However, prior work reports mixed findings on how writing anxiety relates to these motivational beliefs, leaving a conceptual gap in L2 writing research. This study addresses that gap by examining the interplay between writing anxiety and writing motivation among undergraduates in a Malaysian public university. This quantitative survey involved 132 undergraduates and used a 31‑item Likert‑scale instrument organised into two sections: Writing Motivation (self‑efficacy; task value) and Writing Anxiety (cognitive, somatic, avoidance). Reliability for subscales ranged from good to excellent. Descriptive results showed that anxiety was most salient in evaluative and time‑pressured situations, whereas students reported generally high self‑efficacy and task value. Correlation analyses indicated no significant relationships between writing anxiety and self‑efficacy, and between writing anxiety and task value, and inferential tests showed no significant differences in anxiety or self‑efficacy across education background or disciplinary clusters. The overall findings suggest that writing anxiety coexists with strong motivational beliefs and operates as a situational rather than trait‑like inhibitor in this context. Pedagogically, the study implies the need to reduce evaluation salience and time pressure through assessment design and pacing, while sustaining students’ existing competence beliefs and perceived value for writing. Conceptually, the results support a differentiated view in which motivation and anxiety proceed in parallel processes, inviting longitudinal and mixed‑methods to test conditional pathways that may mediate their interplay.

Keywords

writing motivation, writing anxiety, second-language writing

Downloads

References

1. Abd Rahman, A. L., Abd Rashid, M. H., Mohamad, H. A., Md Safian, F. S., Md Zolkapli, R. B., Syed Khalid, S. S. A., Rahmat, N. H., & Nath, P. R. (2025). A study of students’ motivation & burnout in learning English for job interviews. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(3), 3133-3147. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abd Rashid, M. H., Abd Rahman, A. L., Mohamad, H. A., Salam, U., Wan Amir Nizam, W. M. F., Syed Khalid, S. S. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Exploring the influence of sources of burnout in learning elanguage courses. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(3), 2737-2752. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abdel Latif, M. M. (2019). Unresolved issues in defining and assessing writing motivational constructs: A review of conceptualization and measurement perspectives. Assessing Writing, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in research instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Che Shamsudin, M. H., Kassim, H., & Mohamed, A. A. (2025). Students’ anxiety and attitudes towards writing at Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Sungai Baging. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v15i1.11825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. De Smedt, F., Landrieu, Y., De Wever, B., & Van Keer, H. (2023). The role of writing motives in the interplay between implicit theories, achievement goals, self-efficacy, and writing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hashemian, M., & Heidari, A. (2013). The relationship between L2 learners’ motivation/attitude and success in L2 writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 476-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. He, L. (2024). The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jasman, N. H., Saidalvi, A., Mokhtar, M. I., Nasarudin, M. R., Rezwan, N. B. S., & Jasman, N. H. (2023). Exploring writing anxiety of the ESL university students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1997-2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kucuk, T. (2023). Factors leading to writing anxiety in EFL classes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i1p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ochoa, N. C. (2025). Examining the influence of writing anxiety and writing efficacy to English writing skills among senior high school students: Basis for a writing intervention program. Diversitas Journal, 10(2), 552-568. https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i2.3262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Prasetyaningrum, A., Nazri, A., & Asrobi, M. (2021). A study of learners’ writing anxiety in EFL context. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 8(1), 19-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Purnamawati, L. D., Santosa, M. H., & Dewi, K. S. (2025). The effect of using DEEPL on the writing skills of 11th grade students in hospitality major at SMK Negeri 1 Singaraja. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 13(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v13i1.5047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahmat, N.H. (2021) Writers’ beliefs and expectations in academic writing: Towards a model of writing prophecies. European Journal of English language Teaching, 6(4), 48-59. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/3737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Roshid, M. M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2025). English communication skills in international business: Industry expectations versus university preparation. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231184814 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in Motivation Science, 8, 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Vetter, T. R. (2017) Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? International Anesthesia Research Society, 125(5), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wang, C., Zhu, S., & Dai, Y. (2025). The interplay of anxiety, motivation, and engagement in L2 writing: A cross-sectional study of CSL learners. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251341040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wern, T. C., & Rahmat, N. H. (2021). An investigative study on the types and causes of esl writing anxiety: A case study of learners from a Chinese independent middle school. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i3.3553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yan, C. (2024). The inducing factors and coping strategies of English writing anxiety. The Educational Review, USA, 8(1), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.01.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yang, M., Meng, X., & Deris, F. D. (2025). Writing with motivation: To delve into the impacts of modifications in academic materials on learners' motivation, creativity, and writing progress in online instruction. Learning and Motivation, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles