Emotional Framing in Disaster Communication: An Analysis of PAGASA Bulletins and Media Coverage of Typhoon Tino (Kalmaegi) and Severe Tropical Storm Uwan (Fung-Wong) in 2025

Authors

Dr. Jimboy B. Pagalilauan

Cavite State University (Philippines)

Dr. Manny A. Romeroso

Cavite State University (Philippines)

Prof. Emeliza T. Cruz

Cavite State University (Philippines)

Prof. Rosa R. Hernandez

Cavite State University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200288

Subject Category: English

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3960-3966

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-17

Accepted: 2026-02-23

Published: 2026-03-07

Abstract

This study analyzed the emotional framing strategies employed in PAGASA bulletins and media coverage of Typhoon Tino (Kalmaegi) and Severe Tropical Storm Uwan (Fung-Wong) in 2025. Using content and linguistic analysis, the study identified the dominant emotional frames and their communicative purposes in disaster communication. Findings reveal that PAGASA bulletins primarily employed urgency, risk, and institutional legitimacy frames, emphasizing hazard severity and promoting immediate protective actions. In contrast, media reports favored moral and community concern frames, highlighting human experiences, displacement, and social impacts to enhance audience engagement and empathy. Linguistic analysis showed that imperative verbs, technical terminology, emotive language, and authoritative attribution were key strategies for conveying these frames. The study concludes that emotional framing serves multiple functions; warning, informing, reassuring, building empathy, and establishing trust and that the complementary roles of meteorological agencies and media are crucial in shaping public understanding, emotional response, and preparedness behavior during disasters. Recommendations include integrating human-centered messaging with technical warnings, maintaining balanced communication, and promoting coordinated public education campaigns.

Keywords

Emotional framing, disaster communication, PAGASA, media coverage, Typhoon Tino, Tropical Storm Uwan, risk perception, preparedness

Downloads

References

1. Canubas, A. M. G., Barroga-Jamias, S., & Tirol, J. (2016). Communicating climate change and disasters in the Philippines: Media coverage and public perception. Philippine Journal of Communication, 10(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Congjuico, M. A. (2014). Facebook as a disaster communication tool: The Philippine experience. Journal of Media and Development Studies, 5(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://jmds.upou.edu.ph/index.php/journal/article/view/7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Congjuico, M. A. (2018). Social media as a communication lifeline during disasters in the Philippines. Diliman Review, 64(1), 85–102. https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/dilimanreview/article/view/6028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cool, C., Claravall, E., Hall, S., Taketani, K., & Zepeda, R. (2015). Social media use during Typhoon Haiyan: Lessons for health communication. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal, 6(2), 12–18. https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Houston, J. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Rosenholtz, C. E. (2015). Disaster news: Framing and frame changing in coverage of major U.S. natural disasters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014558559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Imperial, J., Orosco, M., Mazo, D., & Maceda, T. (2019). Sentiment analysis of typhoon-related tweets in the Philippines using machine learning techniques. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Morss, R. E., Demuth, J. L., & Lazo, J. K. (2018). Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: A survey of the U.S. public. Weather, Climate, and Society, 10(3), 459–473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0088.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. NewsWatch Plus. (2025). More areas under Signal No. 2 due to “Uwan.” NewsWatch Plus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration. (2025). Tropical cyclone bulletins for Typhoon Tino (Kalmaegi) and Severe Tropical Storm Uwan (Fung-Wong). Department of Science and Technology, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration. (2025). Tropical cyclone bulletin #7: Typhoon Tino. DOST-PAGASA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Philippine News Agency. (2025). Fung-Wong now named Uwan; wind signals raised. Philippine News Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Philstar.com. (2025). “Tino” pounds Negros; Signal No. 4 remains hoisted. Philstar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rappler. (2025). The battle against fake news: The perils of misinformation during disasters in the Philippines. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/battle-versus-fake-news-perils-disinformation-caraga-disasters [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Takahashi, B. (2016). Log in if you survived: Collective coping on social media in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles