Technology Anxiety in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

As digital technologies increasingly permeate educational environments, their psychological consequences have attracted growing scholarly attention, particularly in relation to technology anxiety. Grounded in foundational theories of general anxiety, computer anxiety, and technostress, this study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research on technology anxiety in education from 2000 to 2025. Based on 418 articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, CiteSpace and RAWGraphs were employed to examine publication trends, influential authors and journals, collaborative networks, thematic clusters, and keyword evolution.
The results reveal a substantial and sustained growth in scholarly output, particularly after 2020, coinciding with the rapid digitalization of education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Key thematic clusters include digital literacy, technology acceptance, teacher professional development, emotional readiness, and AI-enhanced learning environments. The analysis also demonstrates a conceptual evolution from early research on computer anxiety and user attitudes toward integrated psychological–pedagogical frameworks emphasizing emotional regulation, well-being, and sustainable technology integration.
By systematically mapping the intellectual structure and developmental trajectories of this field, this study contributes a theoretically grounded and data-driven overview of technology anxiety scholarship in educational contexts. The findings highlight emerging research frontiers and provide strategic insights for future interdisciplinary investigations into emotionally responsive and inclusive digital education.

Keywords

Technology anxiety; Technostress; Computer anxiety; Bibliometric analysis; Digital literacy; Educational technology; Artificial intelligence

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2015). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(sup1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharbi, M. S. (2025). Digital transformation and EFL anxiety: A mixed-methods study on the impact of online learning on the language acquisition psychology of Saudi Arabian students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alsaiari, O., Alharthi, K., & Yamani, A. (2024). Emotionally enriched feedback via generative AI: Effects on student emotions and engagement. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barreto, I. B., Sanchez, R. M. S., Sanchez, W. S., Jordan, O. H., & Escalante, J. D. B. (2023). The process of digital transformation in education during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(9), e03770. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.3770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beckers, J. J., Wicherts, J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Computer anxiety: “Trait” or “state”? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2851–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Berner, J., Dallora, A., Palm, B., Sanmartin Berglund, J., & Anderberg, P. (2023). Five-factor model, technology enthusiasm and technology anxiety. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burgos-Videla, C. G., Rojas, W. a. C., Meneses, E. L., & Martínez, J. (2021). Digital Competence Analysis of university students using latent classes. Education Sciences, 11(8), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cezar, B. G. da S., & Maçada, A. C. (2023). Cognitive overload, anxiety, cognitive fatigue, avoidance behavior and data literacy in big data environments. Information Processing & Management, 60, 103482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chawla, R. N., & Goyal, P. (2021). Emerging trends in digital transformation: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking an International Journal, 29(4), 1069–1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2021-0009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, B., Wu, Y., & Chuang, Y. (2024). The impact of teachers’ perceived competence in information and communication technology usage, and workplace anxiety on well-being, as mediated by emotional exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chu, T., Wang, L., & Zhang, X. (2024). Digital futures: How technologies shape today’s education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54097/atrv0492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dai, C., Ke, F., Dai, Z., & Pachman, M. (2022). Improving teaching practices via virtual reality‐supported simulation‐based learning: Scenario design and the duration of implementation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 836–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Didmanidze, I., Tavdgiridze, L., Zaslavskyi, V., Khasaia, I., Dobordginidze, D., & Olga, Y. (2023). The impact of digital technologies in education. 2023 13th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT). https://doi.org/10.1109/DESSERT61349.2023.10416515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dönmez-Turan, R., & Kır, G. (2019). User anxiety as an external variable of technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2847–2865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09897-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information Literacy: Essential skills for the Information Age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.2.166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ersozlu, Z., & Karakus, M. (2019). Mathematics anxiety: Mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), em1668. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/102441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fernández-Batanero, J., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. González-Ruiz, J., Granero-Gallegos, A., Marín-Marín, J. A., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of anxiety and physical education in Web of Science—A performance and co-word study. Pediatric Reports, 16(4), 1169–1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric16040099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & García, M. G. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research work: Development of an instrument from a PLS-SEM approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16509–16529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11895-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gündoğmuş, H. D. (2024). Digital literacy for children: An overview. African Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.122.24.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hadi, H. K., Safitri, A., Wihara, D. S., Kautsar, A., Purnama, D. W., & Wicaksana, D. Y. (2024). Unveiling the impact of AI-mediated interactions on student outcomes in online learning: A bibliometric analysis. 2024 12th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM). https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2014). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H. H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ioseliani, A., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Svintsova, M., Panov, E. G., Skvortsova, E. M., & Bayanova, A. R. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of articles on digital educational environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), ep444. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Iqbal, S. (2024). Information sustainability in a digital learning environment: Effects of digital anxiety, self-efficacy, and enjoyment on continuance intention. Sustainability, 16(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jamaludin, A., Kee, K. Y., & Perera, D. (2023). Demystifying digital resilience in online teaching using an adapted socio-ecological model. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11174-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jiménez, C. R., Prieto, M. S., & García, S. A. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 9(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jiménez, C. R., Prieto, M. S., & García, S. A. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Jing, Y., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Yu, T., & Shadiev, R. (2023). Bibliometric mapping techniques in educational technology research: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 9283–9311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12178-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Juniati, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Mathematics anxiety in mathematics education: A bibliometrics analysis. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Khafizova, A. A., Zhdanov, S., Beltyukova, O. V., Lapidus, N. I., Grebenshchikova, L. Y., & Lushchik, I. V. (2024). A bibliometric analysis covering the relevant literature on science anxiety over two decades. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2408. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Khafizova, A. A., Zhdanov, S., Beltyukova, O. V., Lapidus, N. I., Grebenshchikova, L. Y., & Lushchik, I. V. (2024). A bibliometric analysis covering the relevant literature on science anxiety over two decades. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Khan, N. K., Aziz, N. M. U., Minhas, N. D. M., & Khan, N. a. I. (2025). The psychological effects of AI-Based learning on student motivation, anxiety, and cognitive load. ˜the œCritical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3527–3540. https://doi.org/10.59075/1fvs0v71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2025). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1498132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kohnke, L. (2024). How GenAI impacts technostress among secondary school English teachers. Proceedings of the International CALL Research Conference, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29140/9780648184485-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Konu Kadirhanoğullari, M., & Ozay Kose, E. (2023). Bibliometric analysis: Technology studies in science education. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kuş, M. (2025). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology related factors on students’ academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1524645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1524645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Li, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Man, C. S., Han, C. K., & Chan, H. Y. (2024). VR technology acceptance for English learning amongst junior high school students in Hong Kong. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 1917–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11866-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Mattock, L. K. (2022). Raspberry Pi and rubber ducks: Digital pedagogy and computer anxiety in the LIS classroom. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2018-0062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Meyer, D. F. (2020). The accidental experiential course: Teaching a psychology of disaster course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, 46(4), 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2022). Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Moorhouse, B.L., Wong, K.M. Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. J. Comput. Educ. 9, 51–70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Murnaka, N. P., Suparta, I. N., Suryani, N. L. P. S., Widiastuti, N. W., & Purnami, I. G. A. (2021). Educational technology research trends: A bibliometrics analysis and visualization. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 2695–2701. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Panisoara, G., Lazar, I., Panisoara, I. O., Chirca, R., & Ursu, A. S. (2020). Motivation and continuance intention towards online instruction among teachers during the COVID 19 pandemic: A large-scale survey. Sustainability, 12(21), 8639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Peng, Zhang, J., Wang, M., Feng, S., Yuan, Y., & Ding, L. (2024). Research hotspots and trends of neuroimaging in social anxiety: A CiteSpace bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1448412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Purcell, W. M., & Lumbreras, J. (2021). Higher education and the COVID-19 pandemic: navigating disruption using the sustainable development goals. Discover Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00013-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The Consequences of technostress for end users in Organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Rospigliosi, A. (2023). AI in higher education: A bibliometric approach to understanding anxiety, acceptance, and adaptation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11276-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Saboor, A., Ali, K., Mugheri, A., & Fatima, M. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on educational leadership: Assessing digital burnout and mental health in virtual teaching. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v7i4.388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Sagarduy, A., Arrieta, N., & Antón, A. (2024). A bibliometric study on mathematics anxiety in primary education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2020). The datafication of higher education: discussing the promises and problems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1689388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Serrano-Ausejo, E. (2025). Exploring Teachers’ Views on Using Immersive Virtual Reality for teaching history. Digital Education Review, 47, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2025.47.108-126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sharma, S., & Kumar, S. (2025). Understanding the facets of work-related fatigue moderated by cognitive, behavioural and contemplative coping strategies: A conceptual analysis. NMIMS Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023241310292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2016). Learning in digital networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers & Education, 109, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Slama, C., & Wilson, R. (2025). Impact of educational technology on student well-being: An Australian perspective. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education. https://doi.org/10.70177/jete.v3i1.2109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Stan, S., Mănescu, G., Grigoraş, C., & Ilie, F. (2024). The digitalisation impact on education level: A bibliometric analysis. International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 30(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2024-0040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2012). Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author‐based citation analysis? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1820–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Stumbrienė, D., Jevsikova, T., & Kontvainė, V. (2023). Key factors influencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology-enabled educational innovation. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1697–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2007). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers' acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: A Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Teo, T., Zhou, M., Fan, A. C. W., & Huang, F. (2019). Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: a study in Macau. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Uddin, M. J., Ferdous, M., Rahaman, A., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Mapping of technostress research trends: A bibliometric analysis. In Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) (pp. 938–943). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCS56967.2023.10142487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Urbán, D. J. A., La Greca, A., García-Fernández, J., & Inglés, C. J. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on adolescent social anxiety and psychoeducational variables in Web of Science 2002–2021. The Journal of General Psychology, 151(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2022.2161982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Valero-Ancco, V. N., Gutierrez, F. S., Lujano-Ortega, Y., & Calderón-Quino, K. M. (2025). Global Trends in gender inequality in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (1993–2024). Educational Process International Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. ISSI, 1087–1092. https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1906.html#abs-1906-07011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Wang, G. X., Deng, J., & Ali, S. (2025). Evaluating the impact of AI-powered audiovisual personalization on learner emotion, focus, and learning outcomes. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Wang, G. X., Deng, J., & Ali, S. (2025). Evaluating the impact of AI-powered audiovisual personalization on learner emotion, focus, and learning outcomes. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wedlock, D., & Trahan, E. (2019). Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a theoretical framework for virtual reality adoption in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09401-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1997). TechnoStress: Coping with technology @Work @Home @Play. Wiley. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA57059459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Wolfe, A. D., & Hartman, S. L. (2024). Remote teaching and learning for teacher candidates: Mentor teacher perspectives. PDS Partners: Bridging Research to Practice, 19(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/pdsp-12-2023-0041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Zhang, Q., Nie, H., Fan, J., & Liu, H. (2025). Exploring the dynamics of artificial intelligence literacy on English as a foreign language Learners’ willingness to communicate: The critical mediating roles of Artificial intelligence Learning Self-Efficacy and Classroom anxiety. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Zhang, X., Xie, Q., Song, C., & Song, M. (2022). Mining the evolutionary process of knowledge through multiple relationships between keywords. Scientometrics, 127(4), 2023–2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04272-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Zhou, L., Li, F., Wu, S., & Zhou, M. (2022). “School’s out, but class’s on”, the largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.ar023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Technology Anxiety in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles