Adapting to Change: Teachers’ Lived Experiences in Multigrade Settings Amid Curriculum Reforms for Equitable Education
Authors
Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
Misamis University, Ozamiz City (Philippines)
Misamis University, Ozamiz City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200338
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 4626-4631
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-02
Accepted: 2026-02-08
Published: 2026-03-10
Abstract
Curriculum reforms play a vital role in improving educational quality and ensuring that teaching practices remain responsive to learners’ evolving needs. The study investigated the lived experiences of public-school teachers navigating multigrade classrooms amid curriculum reforms. Conducted in selected public schools within the Division of Oroquieta City. The study involved 10 purposively selected teachers who met specific inclusion criteria. Using a single semi-structured interview guide, the study collected detailed narratives on teachers’ experiences, which were analyzed through Moustakas’ (1994) phenomenological method. There were five emerging themes identified in the study, namely: physical and emotional strain in navigating multigrade teaching amid curriculum reforms; classroom space as a dynamic enabler of multigrade teaching and curriculum adaptation; experiencing professional growth and fulfillment through student-centered adaptation; supportive relationship as a key influence in teachers’ adaptation to curriculum reforms; and instructional resources as catalysts for adaptation and creativity in multigrade teaching. The interplay of physical and emotional demands, flexible use of space, student-centered practices, supportive relationships, and creative access to instructional resources shapes teachers’ effective adaptation to curriculum reforms in multigrade classrooms. Schools and education stakeholders may strengthen the implementation of curriculum reforms in multigrade settings by providing sustained professional and wellness support for teachers.
Keywords
curriculum reforms; instructional adaptation
Downloads
References
1. Ab Hajis, S., & Othman, N. (2024). Navigating challenges and strategies in implementing differentiated instruction: A conceptual overview. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 1209–1226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abril, G. S. (2025). Extent and challenges in the implementation of the professional development programs to the performance of multigrade teachers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Astuti, D. F., Samanhudi, U., & Pratiwi, W. R. (2024). The challenges teachers and students face in implementing the Merdeka Belajar curriculum for teaching and studying English at SMP Negeri 5 Sangatta Utara. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bano, S., Minaz, M., & Idris, M. U. (2025). Overcrowded classroom: Challenges for elementary school teachers. ProScholar Insights, 4(1), 8–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bojos, W., Almerez, Q. L., Trinidad, A., Arnado, J. A., & Fuentes, A. (2025). Leadership complexities of school heads in multigrade education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 574–588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Berry, B. (2001). Teacher leadership: Toward a new conceptual framework. Educational Forum, 65(2), 120–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Camsa, S. S. (2025). Teaching pedagogies of multi-grade public elementary teachers. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 4(2), 113–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Carvajal, A. L. P., Fernandez, T. M., Pangilinan, A. M., Obod, M. M., Amihan, S. R., Sanchez, R. D., … Sanchez, J. J. D. (2025). Future-proofing teachers in reframing teacher education curriculum in the Philippines: Basis for policy recommendations. International Journal of Open-Access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR), 4(2), 235– 252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chand, S. P. (2024). Bridging the gaps in quality education. The Educational Review, USA, 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cong-Lem, N., & Daneshfar, S. (2024). Generative AI and second/foreign language education from Vygotsky’s cultural-historical perspective. In Innovations in technologies for language teaching and learning (pp. 175–188). Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dontogan, T. G., Lunio-Toctocan, C. T., Ricardo, K. R. D., & Saldo, M. L. (2024). Inclusive pedagogy: Systematic review on exploring stakeholder engagement in multigrade classroom teaching. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(4), 222–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Dülger, M., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2025). Designing a classroom-level teacher dashboard to foster primary school teachers’ direct instruction of self-regulated learning strategies. Education and Information Technologies, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fitrianto, I. (2024). Innovation and technology in Arabic language learning in Indonesia: Trends and implications. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Little, A. W. (2001). Multigrade teaching: Towards an international research and policy agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 21(6), 481–497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Little, A. W. (2006). Education for all and multigrade teaching: Challenges and opportunities. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Maquiling, Z. M. C. (2024). Enhancing literacy and numeracy instruction in multigrade classrooms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. McLure, F. I., & Aldridge, J. M. (2023). Sustaining reform implementation: A systematic literature review. School Leadership & Management, 43(1), 70–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mulkeen, A. (2005). Teachers for rural schools: A challenge for Africa. African Region Working Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2007). The preparation of teachers for multigrade teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 501–514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Muslimah, H., & Sukartono, S. (2025). Teachers' challenges during the transition from the 2013 curriculum to the independent curriculum in elementary schools. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 54(1), 49–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Njinuwo, K. M. (2024). Dilemmas teachers face towards meaningful involvement in curriculum development and implementation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rayas, R. M. C., Inciso, H. R., Servano, K. J. B., Ranille, J. M., Sumeguin, R. A. S., & Espiritu, M. G. (2025). Exploring diverse factors affecting teachers in teaching multi-grade classes. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(6), 2421–2436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Reyes, R. R., & Ching, D. A. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of a multigrade teacher: Inputs for a proposed professional development action plan. TWIST, 19(3), 445–455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Bogatić, K. (2025). Multigrade education and the Montessori model: A pathway towards inclusion and equity. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102600. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sathya, C. (2026). Navigating the changing landscape of education: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. In Toward sustainable environmental education (pp. 49–65). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Shambare, B., & Jita, T. (2025). A new era of learning: Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of virtual lab in rural schools. Education and Information Technologies, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Siregar, N. C. (2025). Breaking barriers: Strategies to close the gender gap in STEM education. Penerbit KBM Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study