The Influence of Mathematical Language on Students’ Ability to Solve Problems in Junior Schools within Cheptiret Zone in Kenya

In Kenya, performance in mathematics by primary school learners continues to be an issue especially in word problem solving. Though competence may be exhibited in computational tasks, most learners tend to show challenges in mathematical problems that are represented in linguistics form. Mathematical language comprising of vocabulary, syntax, symbolic representation and contextual definition is very important in helping the learners to comprehend and solve these problems. Nonetheless, there is little empirical evidence regarding the predictive power of mathematical language on the problem-solving capabilities among primary school students in the Uasin-Gishu County (Biwott, 2022). This paper has discussed how mathematics language has affected the capability of Class Seven learners in Cheptiret Zone to solve mathematical word problems. The adopted design was a descriptive correlational survey design. A sample of 388 learners and 15 mathematical educators out of a population of 1 292 learners result was selected (Biwott, 2022). Learners gathered the data through their questionnaires, in form of structured word problem-solving exercises and teacher questionnaires in addition to interview schedules. Simple linear regression, Pearson correlation, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data, and simple linear regression, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression on the same, whereas thematic analysis of qualitative data on teacher interviews was performed. The findings showed that the relationship between mathematical language competence and problem-solving capacity is statistically significant (r =.62, p=0.05). Regression analysis also showed that math language was an important predictor of the performance of learners in the word problem solving (=0.58, p <.001), which predicted about 38 percent of variance in the scores of learners. These findings were backed up by the qualitative finding of teacher interviews, which also indicated the problems of learners with the interpretation of mathematical vocabulary or word problems into mathematical expressions.

New vocabulary, words problems, mathematical language, problem-solving ability

1. Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amen, J. (2006). Using math vocabulary building to increase problem-solving abilities in a fifth-grade classroom (Action research project report). University of Nebraska. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barton, B., Heidema, C., & Jordan, D. (2003). Teaching reading in mathematics. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 24–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blessman, J., & Myszczak, B. (2001). Mathematics vocabulary and problem-solving ability of middle school students. School Science and Mathematics, 101(4), 219–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burns, M. (2007). About teaching mathematics: A K–8 resource (3rd ed.). Math Solutions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carpenter, T. P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J. M. (1984). Problem structure and first-grade children’s initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 27–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders’ strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 363–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Geary, D. C. (1996). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (2018). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 125(1), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krawec, J. (2019). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(2), 90–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Moschkovich, J. (2012). Mathematics, the common core, and language: Recommendations for mathematics instruction for English learners aligned with the common core. Understanding Language Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. O'Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pape, S. J. (2004). Middle school children’s problem-solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading comprehension perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 187–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Piaget, J. (1936). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Powell, S. R., Driver, M. K., & Julian, T. E. (2017). The influence of reading comprehension on mathematics problem solving for students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 216–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E. M., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sepeng, P., & Madzorera, A. (2014). Sources of difficulty in comprehending and solving mathematical word problems. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 217–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Swanson, H. L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2016). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 231–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Van Rinsveld, A., Schiltz, C., Landerl, K., Brunner, M., & Ugen, S. (2016). The relation between language and arithmetic in primary school children. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Vukovic, R. K., & Lesaux, N. K. (2018). The language of mathematics: Investigating the ways language counts for children’s mathematical development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1024–1041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Walkington, C., Clinton, V., & Sparks, A. (2019). The effect of language complexity on mathematics problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(3), 281–307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study