The Analysis of ChatGPT Usage Impact on Learning Motivation Among Graduate in Johor

The widespread integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has significantly reshaped how university students interact with learning materials and complete academic tasks. Among AI tools, ChatGPT has become one of the most frequently used platforms, particularly due to its ability to generate explanations, summarise content, and provide writing assistance. This study examines the impact of ChatGPT usage on learning motivation among university students in Johor. A quantitative survey involving 209 students from public university was conducted to analyse how frequently students use ChatGPT and how such usage influences their learning motivation. Data were collected through online questionnaires using adapted instruments measuring ChatGPT usage (10 items) and learning motivation (9 items) on a 5-point Likert scale. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between ChatGPT usage and learning motivation (r = 0.676, p < .001), indicating that students who frequently utilise ChatGPT tend to demonstrate higher academic motivation. The mean score for ChatGPT usage was 3.77, while learning motivation scored 3.68, suggesting moderately high engagement levels. Reliability analysis confirmed the internal consistency of both constructs (α = 0.868 for ChatGPT usage; α = 0.887 for learning motivation). Despite these positive outcomes, the study acknowledges potential risks of excessive reliance on AI tools, which may compromise independent learning skills. The study's implications suggest that ChatGPT should be positioned as a supportive learning tool rather than a primary source of academic output. Recommendations include establishing guidelines for responsible AI use and strengthening digital literacy programmes within Malaysian universities.

ChatGPT; artificial intelligence in education; learning motivation; university students; higher education; Malaysia

1. Adıgüzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15 (3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students' voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 4149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Mughairi, H., & Bhaskar, P. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of AI techniques in higher education: Insights from teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 18(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15 (4), ep448. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anders, B. A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?. Patterns, 4(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can chat GPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Caratiquit, K. D., & Caratiquit, L. J. C. (2023). ChatGPT as an academic support tool on the academic performance among students: The mediating role of learning motivation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 21-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Daud, M. Z., Ismail, E., Azli, M. S. M., Omar, M. K. A. R., Asyraf, M. I. A. M. J., Mahmod, N. M., ... & Sultan, A. A. M. (2024). Perspektif Mahasiswa Universiti Teknikal di Malaysia Terhadap Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Sebagai Pemudah Cara Menyiapkan Tugasan Berbahasa Melayu. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 8(2), 183-198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dewi, N. E. (2025). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’MOTIVATION AND ENGAGEMENT IN LEARNING ACTIVITY USING ChatGPT. SOSIOEDUKASI: JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 14(1), 459-473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., ... & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W. (2024). Higher education students' task motivation in the generative artificial intelligence context: The case of ChatGPT. Information, 15(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huang, Q. (2012). Action research on motivation in English reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1755-1761. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1755-1761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu, Y. (2024). The dual nature of motivation: Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers in second language learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 11, 710-714. https://doi.org/10.62051/yggb6c12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education. (2023). Higher education statistics 2023. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pallivathukal, R. G., Soe, H. H. K., Donald, P. M., Samson, R. S., & Ismail, A. R. H. (2024). ChatGPT for academic purposes: Survey among undergraduate healthcare students in Malaysia. Cureus, 16, e53032. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Prameswari, V. (2025). The influence of ChatGPT usage on the learning motivation of social studies education students at Universitas Negeri Semarang. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 52(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v52i1.28762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students' perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805-38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Siregar, F. H., Hasmayni, B., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The analysis of ChatGPT usage impact on learning motivation among scout students. International Journal of Research and Review, 10 (7), 632-638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., & Larasati, N. (2023). Unlocking the potential of generative AI models and systems such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT for higher education: A guide for students and lecturers. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 802-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Xu, C. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Potential Influencing Factors for ChatGPT-Assisted Education. International Journal of Technology-Enhanced Education (IJTEE), 3(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtee.339189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yakin, A. A., Muthmainnah, M., Apriani, E., Obaid, A. J., & Elngar, A. A. (2023). Transforming online learning management: Generative models on ChatGPT to enhance online student engagement scale (OLE). Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan), 7(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v7i2.1514 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zakaria, S. K. (2025). Challenges faced by students using ChatGPT: A qualitative study at private universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 15 (9), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.55493/5007.v15i9.5540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhou, W. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on undergraduate student’s English learning motivation. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences FMESS, 2024. https://doi.org/10.54097/9hyk2039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study