Factors Affecting the Implementation of Practical Lessons in Physics: A Qualitative Case Study of Community Day Secondary Schools in Lilongwe, Malawi

This qualitative multiple case study explored the factors that influence the implementation of practical physics classes in three Community Day Secondary Schools in Lilongwe, Malawi. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three head teachers and six physics teachers, while focus group discussions were held with 30 physics students. The reflexive thematic analysis of the data, conducted using the Braun and Clarke approach, identified three interrelated themes: the deprivation of systemic resource and capacity, the presence of cognitive dissonance between valued ideals and the reality of systemic constraints, and theoretical dominance with performative compliance. The results of this study confirmed that only one of the six teachers was specialized in science, that there were no operational laboratories in the schools, and that practicals were almost nonexistent despite their recognition as important by all stakeholders. With Fullan’s Educational Change Model and Hofstein & Lunetta’s Laboratory Learning Framework as theoretical perspectives, this study has revealed a self-fulfilling cycle of implementation failure, where resource weaknesses, teacher capacity weaknesses, and organizational barriers combine to maintain theoretically dominated teaching. The study recommends efforts at teacher capacity development and curriculum change to facilitate effective practical physics teaching.

practical physics; Community Day Secondary Schools; educational change

1. Amunga, J. K., Musasia, M. A., & Musera, G. (2011). Disparities in physics achievement and enrolment in secondary schools in Western Province: Implications for strategy and renewal. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 31, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chilenga, K., & Banda, F. (2018). Challenges of implementing practical science lessons in secondary schools in Malawi. International Journal of Science and Education, 10(4), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chirwa, G., Phiri, A., & Mwale, M. (2020). Factors influencing science teaching and learning in Malawian secondary schools: A case study of Lilongwe District. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(12), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). (1999). The importance of physics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jere, C. M. (2010). Research methods in education (2nd ed.). Chancellor College Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kapting'ei, K. B., & Rutto, D. K. (2014). Challenges facing laboratory practical approach in physics instruction in Kenyan district secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 122–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kola, A. J. (2013). Students' challenges in conducting adequate physics practicals in colleges of education. Academic Journal of Science, 2(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mlangeni, T., & Chiotha, S. S. (2015). Why is the student performance in physical science examinations at rural community day secondary schools poor in Lilongwe Rural West Education District in Malawi? International Journal of Science and Research, 4(11), 1842–1846. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Muletal, T., & Seid, M. (2016). Factors affecting the implementation of practical activities in science education in some selected secondary and preparatory schools of the Afar Region. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 32–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study