Social Entrepreneurship as a Space for Empowerment and Agency Among Youth With Disabilities in Cameroon: A Capability-Oriented Qualitative Study

In low-income countries, young persons with disabilities face persistent structural, social, and symbolic barriers that limit their access to economic participation and social recognition. While entrepreneurship is increasingly promoted as a pathway to inclusion, little is known about its potential as a space for empowerment and agency beyond economic outcomes. Drawing on empowerment theory and the capability approach, this qualitative study explores how social entrepreneurship contributes to the development of agency, perceived freedoms, and social inclusion among young persons with disabilities participating in Cameroon’s Plan Triennal Spécial-Jeunes (PTS-Jeunes). Based on semi-structured interviews conducted in the Centre Region of Cameroon, the findings reveal that social entrepreneurship functions as a multidimensional process of empowerment, enabling participants to redefine their social roles, expand their capabilities, and negotiate structural constraints. However, empowerment remains fragile and uneven, highly dependent on collective support structures, institutional arrangements, and social recognition. The study highlights the importance of moving beyond individualistic models of entrepreneurship toward inclusive and capability-enhancing ecosystems.

social entrepreneurship, disability, empowerment, capability approach

1. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun , V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches(4thed.).Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Halabisky, D. (2021). Inclusive entrepreneurship policies: Supporting people with disabilities in business creation. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hessels, J., & Naudé, W. (2020). The emergence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 54(4), 1149–1167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. Handbook of Community Psychology, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper