Faculty Strategies and Institutional Responses to Distance Learning Implementation During COVID-19

The study investigates the involvement and adaptive approach of the faculty members along with the implementation of the various formulated learning modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research objective is to deliver a comprehensive evaluation of how educators have responded to the adapted system of instruction including online and modular forms while simultaneously addressing the dilemma posed by the sudden transition from traditional classroom setting. Employing a grounded theory approach, this study conducted a semi-structured interview set-up with twelve licensed professional teachers from six higher education institutions (HEIs). The development of themes into patterns that reflect the modifications in instructional implementation leads to a theoretical framework that enlightens future educational practices. The findings feature how the HEIs have substantially adapted to new pedagogical strategies warranted by the new normal setting with the integration of synchronous and asynchronous learning mechanisms. The participants manifested a strong reliance on digital platforms for instructional delivery, emphasizing both the challenges and successes encountered. Furthermore, while most faculty initially are crucial with technology-based platforms, progress was observed through time, aided by training sessions and collaborative working environments. An efficient institutional support and drive are essential for enhancing faculty readiness and involvement, ultimately leading to enhanced student learning outcomes. Demonstrated flexibility in teaching execution is noted as HEIs continue to respond and resolve the complexities of distance learning. Qualitative analysis further reveals that sustained institutional commitment, resource accessibility, and faculty professional growth collectively contribute to the long-term viability of distance education. With this, the Adaptive and Disruption-Responsive Institutional Framework for Teaching (ADRIFT) emerged, grounded from the data collected, offering a replicable model for future crisis-driven educational transitions.

Faculty Strategies, Institutional Responses, Distance Learning

1. Alharbi, W. (2017). E-Feedback as a Scaffolding Teaching Strategy in the Online Language Classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517697966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anand, N. & Bachmann, A. (2021). Teacher’s Working Condition and Hybrid Teaching Environment: A Narrative Case Study. IAFOR Journal of Education: Studies in Education, 9 (6). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.6.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ancheta, R.F. & Ancheta H.B. (2020). The New Normal in Education: A Challenge to the Private Basic Education Institutions in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1 (1). https://iiari.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-New-Normal-in-Education-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, T. & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2020). A Critical Look at Educational Technology from a Distance Education Perspective. Digital Education Review, 37. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Andy Hargreaves. 2021. What the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us about teachers and teaching. FACETS, 6: 1835-1863. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barton, E.A., Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Benson, V., Anderson, D., & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.586676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brand-Gruwel, S., Kester, L., Kicken, W. & Kirschner, P. (2014). Learning Ability Development in Flexible Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carlin, A.P. & Kim, Y. H. (2019). Teaching Qualitative Research: Versions of Grounded Theory. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Carstens, K.J., Mallon, J.M., Bataineh, M. & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20 (1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290791.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chan, R., Bista, K., & Allen, R. (2021). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during COVID-19: International Perspectives and Experiences (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., de Gispert, I., & Diaz-Barriga, F. (2013). Distribution of feedback among teacher and students in online collaborative learning in small groups. Digital Education Review, 23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1013721.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Commission on Higher Education. (2020). Guideline on the Implementation of Flexible Learning. https://chedro3.ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/CMO-No.-4-s.-2020-Guidelines-on-the-Implementation-of-Flexible-Learning.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., Gardner, M, & Espinoza, D. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dayagbil, F.T., Palompon, D.R., Garcia, L.L. & Olvido, M.M.J. (2021). Teaching and Learning Continuity Amid and Beyond the Pandemic. Front. Educ. 6:678692. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Deeley, R. M. (2021). Teachers' Perceptions of Factors that Contribute to Technology-Infused Instruction: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Northcentral University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 28713779. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4b9cbb9af0d4ea83ada54140c6160337/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fabriz. S., Mendzheritskaya, J. & Stehle, S. (2021) Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 12:733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Edition. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9, 1, pp 112-125. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gogolou, A. & Grigoriadou, M. (2021). Educating Students in Technology Enhanced Learning Design by Interweaving Instruction and Assessment. Informatics in Education, 20, 3, 421–438. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gonzalez, M.L., Rivilla, A.M., Garrido, M.C., and Dominguez, M.M. (2019). The Learning Platform in Distance Higher Education: Student’s Perceptions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20 (1), 5. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Guilbaud, T.C., Martin, F., and Polly, D. (2020). Examining the Digital Professor’s Use of Technology and the Required Support. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32 (3), 376-387. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1299932.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hofer, S. I., Nistor, N., & Scheibenzuber, C. (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations. Computers in human behavior, 121, 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. E., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara. Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction, pp. 13-29. New York: Taylor & Francis. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577147.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jones, M. (2021). Technology as a Technology as a Tool for Support: Classroom Teachers and Resource Specialists in Collaboration and Communication Practices. Master of Science in Education | Master's Theses. 40. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2021.EDU.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kintu, M.J., Zhu, C. & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kokoc, M. (2019). Flexibility in e-Learning: Modelling its Relation to Behavioural Engagement and Academic Performance. Themes in eLearning, 12, 1-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1251161.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kraft, M. A., Simon, N. S., & Lyon, M. A. (2021). Sustaining a sense of success: The protective role of teacher working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1938314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lewis-Pierre, L.J., Kovacich, J., & Amankwaa, L. (2017). The Application of Grounded Theory: An Example from Nursing Workforce Research. The Qualitative Report, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Madenyska, N.N., Sovtys, N.M., Halatiuk, M.Y., Symonovych, N.V. & Shuryn, O.I. (2020). The Analysis of Alternative Distance Learning Implementation into the System of General Professional Training of Teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Marshall-Stuart, D. D. (2018). Blended Learning as an Instructional Strategy to Improve Academic Performance. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6780&context=dissertations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning, 23(3), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. McAleavy, T., Hall-Chen A., Horrocks, S. & Riggall, A. (2018). Technology supported professional development for teachers: lessons from developing countries. Education Development Trust. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593386.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Moorhouse, B.L. & Kohnke, L. (2021). Thriving or Surviving Emergency Remote Teaching Necessitated by COVID-19: University Teachers’ Perspectives. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 30, 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00567-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Nadeem, A., Malik, N. and Noreen, S. (2021). Learning Management System: An Innovation in Teaching Learning Process at University Level. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 3(2), pp. 409–428. https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v3i2.106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. OECD. (2020). Education and COVID-19: Focusing on the long-term impact of school closures, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). https://doi.org/10.1787/2cea926e-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ontario College of Teachers. (2017). Maintaining Professionalism: Use of Electronic Communication and Social Media. https://www.oct.ca/-/media/PDF/Advisory%20Social%20Media/ProfAdvSocMediaENPRINT.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pitsoe, V.J. & Maila, M. (2013). Re-thinking Teacher Professional Development through Schön’s Reflective Practice and Situated Learning Lenses. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4(3), 211-218. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/466/496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sadeghi, M.A. (2019). Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1 (4). https://www.academia.edu/62664847/A_Shift_from_Classroom_to_Distance_Learning_Advantages_and_Limitations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Salamondra, T. (2021). Effective Communication in Schools. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 13, 22-26. https://www.brandonu.ca/master-education/files/2023/08/BU-Journal-of-Graduate-Studies-in-Education-2021-vol-13-issue-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Suen, L. W., Huang H., & Lee, H. (2014). A Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Hu Li Za Zhi, 61(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Tam, G. & El-Azar, D. (2020). 3 Ways the Coronavirus Pandemic Could Reshape Education. The World Economic Forum COVID Action Platform. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/3-ways-coronavirus-is-reshaping-education-and-what-changes-might-be-here-to-stay/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Williams, T.K., McIntosh, R.W., & Russell, W.B. (2021). Equity in distance education during COVID-19. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Zhao, P., Kynäshlahti, H., & Sintonen, S. (2018). A qualitative analysis of the digital literacy of arts education teachers in Chinese junior high and high schools. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616658341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study