Leadership Practices and Implementation Challenges of Secondary School Administrators in Drug Prevention Education: A Mixed-Methods Study
Authors
Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, University of Selangor, Kuala Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, University of Selangor, Kuala Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200560
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 7844-7862
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-04
Accepted: 2026-03-09
Published: 2026-03-20
Abstract
This mixed-methods study explores the leadership practices and challenges encountered by secondary school administrators in implementing drug prevention education in Terengganu, Malaysia. Drawing on Kotter’s Change Management Model, the research utilizes quantitative surveys (n=130) and qualitative interviews (n=23) to evaluate administrator engagement, program strategies, and obstacles to effective prevention. Notably, the results demonstrate that administrators perform strongly in student engagement, program monitoring, resource allocation, and fostering community partnerships. However, staff training emerges as an area in need of further development. To address these gaps, administrators are integrating prevention into the curriculum, building partnerships with agencies and parents, and empowering students to act as peer educators. Furthermore, thematic analysis indicates that successful implementation is driven by holistic, collaborative, and student-centered approaches. Although structured management frameworks contribute to program sustainability, the study acknowledges limitations, including resource constraints and the use of self-reported data. Therefore, it is recommended that schools enhance professional development for staff, broaden stakeholder participation, and implement innovative strategies to strengthen drug prevention efforts. Overall, these actionable findings not only inform policy and practice but also support the creation of safer and healthier school environments through sustained and inclusive prevention initiatives.
Keywords
Drug Prevention Education; School Administrators; Kotter’s Change Management Model
Downloads
References
1. Árva, D., Vokó, Z., Sápi, M., Cselkó, Z., & Rákosy, Z. (2024). The influence of institutional characteristics on implementing school-based universal addiction prevention: A Hungarian mixed-methods nationwide study on the state of implementation, barriers, and facilitators. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1240909. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1240909/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cadri, A., Beema, A. N., Schuster, T., Barnett, T., Asampong, E., & Adams, A. M. (2024). School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Addiction, 119(12), 2048–2075. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches (Sixth Edition). SAGE Publishing. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Drug use prevention in Brazilian schools: Associated factors affecting implementation. BMC Public Health (2018). https://www.springermedizin.de/drug-use-prevention-factors-associated-with-program-implementati/15516766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Eisman, A. B., Koffkey, C., Partridge, R. T., et al. (2025). Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD): Protocol of a pilot randomized trial to enhance the impact of an evidence-based intervention for youth. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Eisman, A. B., Palinkas, L. A., Brown, S., Lundahl, L., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2022). A mixed-methods investigation of implementation determinants for a school-based universal prevention intervention. Implementation Research and Practice, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221124962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. El-Khatib, Z., Herrera, C., Campello, G., Mattfeld, E., & Maalouf, W. (2021). The role of law enforcement officers/police in drug prevention within educational settings—Study protocol for the development of a guiding document based on experts’ opinions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Farrugia, A. (2023). Under pressure: The paradox of autonomy and social norms in drug education. International Journal of Drug Policy, 122, 104194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Handrianto, C., Jusoh, A. J., Choo, P. G. S., Abdul Rashid, N., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). The role of teachers in prevention of drug abuse in schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(11), 708–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i11/8131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kotter, J. P. (2021). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press. https://www.shortform.com/summary/leading-change-summary-john-p-kotter [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(5), 607–610. file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/DETERMINING_SAMPLE_SIZE_FOR_RESEARCH5b15d.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nguyen, H. T., Yousef, M., Durl, J., Saleme, P., Pendergast, D., & Dietrich, T. (2025). School-Based AOD Prevention: A Scoping Review of Teachers’ Insights into Program Implementation. Australian Journal of Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441251403174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Nicholas, J., Mills, B., Hansen, S., Bright, S. J., Scott, J., Ridout, I., Watson, J., Boyd, H., Brook, L., & Hopper, L. (2023). Side Effect Game Plan: Development of a serious game about alcohol and other drugs for high school students using a systematic and iterative user-centered game development framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003117452/spss-survival-manual-julie-pallant [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Petersen, Z., Khan, G., & Daniels, D. (2025). Looking through the lens of an educator: The role of schools in the management of alcohol and other drug use among high school learners. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 63(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2024.2411594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rakhshani, T., Kamranpoor, S., Kamyab, A., Yari, A., & Khani Jeihooni, A. (2025). The effect of an educational intervention on the prevention of drug abuse in students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2442026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Shrestha, S., Velayudhan, B., Y. N., S., R., V. L., & Khattri, J. B. (2024). Effectiveness of school-based substance abuse prevention program (SSPP) on awareness, attitude, peer pressure, and life skills among adolescents in selected public schools of Pokhara, Nepal: A cluster randomized trial protocol. Mental Health & Prevention, 34, 200342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2024.200342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. United Nations Statistics Division. (2025). Development data and outreach: The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/news/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. United Nations. (2023). Solution 17 for good health & wellbeing is the outcome of sensitization on the nature of drug use, drug prevention, treatment & care. https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/solution17-good-health-wellbeing-sdg3-target-35-outcome- sensitization-nature-drug-use [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Weng, Y., Li, Y., Chang, C., Huang, S., Liao, J., Huang, K., Hsu, H., Huang, C., & Guo, J. L. (2025). Effectiveness of an interactive digital intervention program on knowledge, health literacy, and learner engagement in senior high school students: Intragroup and intergroup comparison of 2 teaching models. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e76109. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e76109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study