Roots in Foreign Soil: A Phenomenological–Thematic Study of Migrant Farmers’ Adaptation, Livelihood, and Identity

Migration has become a common livelihood strategy among farmers facing economic insecurity, environmental stress, and limited opportunities in their places of origin. This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of migrant farmers in a host farming community, focusing on their reasons for migration, the challenges they encountered during adaptation, the strategies they developed to sustain their livelihood, the ways migration shaped their identity, and the support systems that facilitated or constrained their adjustment. Guided by a phenomenological–thematic approach, the study drew on in depth interviews with migrant farmers and employed Colaizzi informed thematic analysis to capture shared meanings grounded in participants’ narratives.
Findings revealed that migration was primarily driven by survival needs and family responsibility, with farming chosen due to its accessibility and familiarity. Adaptation was shaped by interconnected environmental, economic, and social challenges, including water scarcity, unstable income, debt, language barriers, and emotional isolation. In response, migrant farmers developed adaptive strategies rooted in learning through guidance and experience, endurance, cooperation, and reliance on work relationships. Migration also influenced identity formation, as participants gradually developed a sense of belonging, redefined themselves through work and responsibility, and negotiated their identity over time. Support systems, particularly informal mutual aid and employer based assistance, played a critical but uneven role in facilitating adaptation.
The study concludes that migrant farmers’ adaptation is a cumulative and relational process sustained by endurance, learning, and social engagement rather than immediate stability. By foregrounding migrant farmers’ lived experiences, this research contributes to understanding migration as an ongoing process of negotiating livelihood, identity, and belonging within a specific community context. The findings offer insights relevant to education, community practice, and future research on migration and rural livelihoods.

Migrant farmers, Rural migration, Livelihood adaptation, Identity formation, Community integration

1. Adger, W. N., Safra de Campos, R., Mortreux, C., & Ghosh, T. (2020). Migration, adaptation, and climate change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anthias, F. (2013). Identity and belonging: Conceptualizations and political framings. KLA Working Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging: An analytical framework. Geography Compass, 4(6), 644– 659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asian Development Bank. (2021). Labor migration in Asia: Impacts and policy responses. https://www.adb.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Balisacan, A. M., Hill, H., & Piza, S. (2018). The Philippine economy: Development, policies, and challenges. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011). Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478(7370), 447–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/478447a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carling, J., & Schewel, K. (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 945–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Agriculture. (2022). Philippine agriculture situation report. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Agriculture CAR. (2021). Cordillera regional agriculture report. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). The state of food and agriculture 2021. FAO. https://www.fao.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022). Migration, agriculture, and rural development. FAO. https://www.fao.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2021). Rural development report. IFAD. https://www.ifad.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Labour Organization. (2020). Global labour migration trends report. ILO. https://www.ilo.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Labour Organization. (2021). Labour migration and rural employment. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. International Organization for Migration. (2021). World migration report 2021. IOM. https://www.iom.int [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. International Organization for Migration. (2022). Migration and rural livelihoods report. IOM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. National Economic and Development Authority. (2021). Philippine development report. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. National Economic and Development Authority. (2022). Philippine migration and development report. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. National Economic and Development Authority. (2023). Socioeconomic report. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Migration outlook report. OECD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Rural development and migration. OECD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Migration and labour mobility report. OECD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2021). Internal migration and rural livelihoods. PIDS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2022). Migration, agriculture, and rural economy. PIDS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). Internal migration statistics report. PSA. https://www.psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). Philippine labor and migration report. PSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rigg, J., Salamanca, A., & Thompson, E. C. (2020). The changing nature of rural livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Scoones, I. (2015). Sustainable livelihoods and rural development. Practical Action Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tacoli, C. (2019). Migration, rural development, and urbanization. World Development, 113, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tuffour, I., Braimah, I., & Afriyie, K. (2024). Climate change and agricultural migration adaptation. Climate and Development, 16(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2162345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Migration and development report. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Orientation and Mobility Training as a Core Component of Supported Employment for Employees with Visual Impairment
• Chamar Caste Movement and Its Leaders in District Bijnor (1900–1950 Ad)
• Influence of Menstrual Health Management on Mental Health of Adolescents in Thrissur District
• Echoes Beneath the Earth: Cultural and Spiritual Beliefs of Miners in the Mining Industry
• An Analytical Exploration of Construction Contract Terms from Legal Cases