Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive Digital Transformation for Differently Abled Students in Sri Lankan Higher Education

This study critically examines the potential for inclusive digital transformation within Sri Lankan higher education (HE), specifically focusing on addressing the persistent inequalities that characterize the digital divide for students with disabilities. The rapid, global shift to online education, significantly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, exposed critical gaps in technological infrastructure, digital literacy, and pedagogical inclusivity within the nation’s universities. Employing a qualitative, interpretive research design grounded in constructivist and phenomenological paradigms, this research explored the lived experiences of 20 differently abled undergraduates and five academic staff members across four public Sri Lankan universities. Data were systematically gathered through semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis. The findings reveal that while digital transformation ensured educational continuity during crises, it concurrently exacerbated disparities concerning accessibility, the availability of assistive technology, and institutional responsiveness. Key systemic barriers identified include a pervasive lack of policy coherence, limited faculty preparedness regarding inclusive digital pedagogy, and insufficient institutional accountability. Conversely, the study documents students’ remarkable resilience, adaptive agency, and strong peer collaboration as powerful forces that help navigate otherwise exclusionary systems. The research emphatically argues that effectively bridging the digital divide requires integrating Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and Digital Equity Theory into HE policy, pedagogy, and operational practice. By systematically institutionalizing inclusive digital design and proactively fostering comprehensive attitudinal change, Sri Lanka can achieve equitable and sustainable access to higher education for all learners.

Digital Divide, Higher Education, Inclusive Education, Universal Design for Learning

1. Al-Azawei, A., & Serenelli, F. (2023). Inclusive pedagogy in the digital age: Applying Universal Design for Learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 101–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aziz, A., Islam, M., & Zakaria, N. (2020). Online learning in South Asia: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 8(3), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azubuike, O. B., Adegboye, O., & Quadri, H. (2021). Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Burgstahler, S. (2022). Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. CAST. (2022). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 3.0. CAST. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chakraborty, S., & Prasad, R. (2023). Accessibility and inclusion in post-pandemic higher education. International Review of Education, 69(2), 143–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cooper, M. (2006). Accessibility challenges in online education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hamburg, I., & Lütgen, G. (2019). Digital Divide, Digital Inclusion and Inclusive Education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(4), 193–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hantrais, L., Allin, P., Kritikos, M., Sogomonjan, M., Anand, P. B., Livingstone, S., & Innes, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the digital revolution: Implications for education and inequality. European Commission Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jia, L., & Santi, M. (2021). Inclusive education for students with disabilities during the pandemic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Marabelli, M., Vaast, E., & Li, J. L. (2021). The effects of the digital scars of COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. NTIA. (1995). Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the ‘Have Nots’ in Rural and Urban America. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. O’Hanlon, N. (2005, April). Valuing students' intellectual diversity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online education and the digital divide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Panda, M. I., Chhatar, M. D. C., & Mharana, B. (2013). The digital divide and ICT access. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Radovanović, D., Hogan, B., & Lalić, D. (2015). Overcoming digital divides in higher education: Digital literacy beyond Facebook. SAGE Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rameez, A., Fowsar, M. A. M., & Lumna, N. (2021). Online learning in Sri Lankan universities during COVID-19: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Asian Education Studies, 3(2), 1–10. (Note: Sources list a 2020 version of this study; 2021 is used from the primary reference list.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Richardson, J. T. (2015). Outcomes in deaf and hard-of-hearing students taking courses by distance learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Robinson, L., Schulz, J., & Khilnani, A. (2022). Digital Equity Theory: Access, Skills, and Outcomes. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sato, M., & Nakamura, Y. (2023). Inclusive higher education in Japan: Digital accessibility practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Selwyn, N., & Jandrić, P. (2022). Post-Digital Society and Education: Critical Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sharma, D., Collins, E., & Bennett, T. (2024). Accessibility audits and inclusive e-learning. Computers & Education, 197, 104712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Treve, M. (2021). Policies to alleviate the harmful effects of COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education—A Tool on Whose Terms? UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Van Dijk, J. A. (2006). The digital divide, as the gap between those who have and do not have access to computers and the Internet [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wedasinghe, N., Sirisoma, N., & Wicramarachchi, A. P. R. (2015). Unequal opportunities in retrieving Information technology and Internet access for those with different impairments. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wedasinghe, N., & Wicramarachchi, R. (2014). ICT Model to Overcome Sri Lankan Disability Digital Divide. International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, 4(11), 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wedikandage, L. Creativity and Innovation: Current Practices through Teaching Methods in Secondary Schools, Journal of International Research and Innovation in Social Science, ISSN: 2454-6186, 939-944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wedikandage, L., & Zahir, M. (2024). The relationship between mobile phone usage and academic performance of secondary school students: A case study in Asian international school. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study