Women’s Empowerment, Mixed Methods, And Long-Term Collaboration in Agricultural Research for Development

Women’s empowerment has become a central objective in agricultural research for development, yet its complex, context-specific nature poses conceptual, methodological, and operational challenges. This article reflects on a long-term, feminist-informed collaboration of more than a decade that used mixed methods to study women’s empowerment in agriculture across diverse projects, countries, and research teams. Drawing on quantitative indices, including adaptations of the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI and pro-WEAI), and complementary qualitative work, the collaboration interrogated how empowerment is defined, measured, and experienced, and how these understandings evolve over time. Mixed methods were applied within single projects, across related sub-projects, and cumulatively across projects to generate insights into joint asset ownership, intra-household decision-making, time use, and agency, revealing empowerment as multidimensional, relational, and dynamic rather than a static outcome. The article examines how sustained collaboration among researchers from the Global North and South, and across disciplines, challenged assumptions embedded in standardized measures, sharpened conceptual precision, and exposed tensions between instrumental and intrinsic, as well as individual and collective forms of agency. It also highlights the institutional conditions that enable meaningful collaboration—particularly long-term funding, leadership, and iterative learning processes—and how these conditions shape knowledge production and policy influence. The article concludes by proposing priorities for the next generation of agricultural research for development on women’s empowerment, including deeper integration of qualitative inquiry, attention to shifting norms and power relations, and the continued co-development of metrics that remain sensitive to context while enabling comparison across interventions and time.

Women’s empowerment in agriculture; mixed methods; feminist research

1. Acosta, M., van Wessel, M., van Bommel, S., Ampaire, E., Twyman, J., Jassogne, L., & Feindt, P. H. (2020). What does it mean to make a “joint” decision? Unpacking intra-household decision making in agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arintyas, A. (2024). Gender norms and empowerment pathways in agricultural development programs. World Development Perspectives, 34, 100548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ayuya, O., Gido, E., Bett, H., & Wanyama, R. (2025). Gender transformative extension approaches and women’s empowerment in agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 215, 103823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Doss, C., & Rubin, D. (2021). Women’s empowerment and agricultural development: A review of measurement approaches. World Development, 146, 105567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Doss, C., & Rubin, D. (2025). Measuring empowerment in agricultural development: Lessons from long-term mixed methods collaboration. World Development, forthcoming. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2019). Rebutting the myth of methodological uniformity in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 275–281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Galiè, A., Teufel, N., Korir, L., Baltenweck, I., Girard, A., Dominguez-Salas, P., & Yount, K. (2018). The Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index. Social Indicators Research, 142, 799–825. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heckert, J., Malapit, H., & Quisumbing, A. (2022). Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture: Lessons from the WEAI. Food Policy, 108, 102235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haug, R., Bolwig, S., Ponte, S., & Riisgaard, L. (2021). Gender and agricultural value chains. World Development, 138, 105211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2018). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kumar, N., Scott, S., Menon, P., Kannan, S., Cunningham, K., & Quisumbing, A. (2021). Pathways from women’s group-based programs to nutrition change. World Development, 146, 105574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Levitt, H. M., et al. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative and mixed methods research in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malapit, H., Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Seymour, G., Martinez, E., Heckert, J., Rubin, D., Vaz, A., & Yount, K. (2019). Development of the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). World Development, 122, 675–692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Malapit, H., et al. (2023). Extensions of the pro-WEAI for value chains and market engagement. Food Policy, 115, 102422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Malhotra, A., Schuler, S., & Boender, C. (2024). Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. World Development, 169, 106365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Masset, E., et al. (2023). Agricultural mechanization and women’s empowerment: Evidence review. Agricultural Economics, 54(2), 245–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Matović, N., & Ovesni, K. (2021). The role of mixed methods research in social sciences. SAGE Open, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Meinzen-Dick, R., et al. (2019). Engendering agricultural research. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11, 421–444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mgalamadzi, J., Kachule, R., & Mapila, M. (2024). Gendered outcomes of commercialization in African agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 60(4), 520–536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ogolla, J., Njuki, J., & Waithanji, E. (2022). Gender dynamics in small ruminant production systems in Kenya. Agricultural Systems, 198, 103385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. O'Hara, C., & Clement, F. (2018). Power as agency: A critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the WEAI. World Development, 106, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Prithika, S., et al. (2024). Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture: A scoping review of WEAI-based studies. Food Security, 16, 1121–1142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Malapit, H., Seymour, G., Martinez, E., Heckert, J., Rubin, D., Vaz, A., & Yount, K. (2021). Women’s empowerment and agricultural development. World Development, 146, 105574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Quisumbing, A., Rubin, D., Meinzen-Dick, R., Seymour, G., & Malapit, H. (2023). Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture: Innovations and insights from the WEAI. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 15, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Quisumbing, A., et al. (2024). Impact of agricultural development programs on women’s empowerment: Evidence from GAAP2. World Development, 175, 106513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sanya, B., et al. (2025). Gendered control over livestock assets in Eastern Africa. Agricultural Systems, forthcoming. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Strijker, D., Zasada, I., & Pinto-Correia, T. (2020). Mixed methods in rural research. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tavenner, K., & Crane, T. (2022). Gender and agricultural transformation. Global Food Security, 32, 100597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Waid, J., et al. (2022). Homestead food production and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 18(S1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yount, K., et al. (2019). Measuring women’s agency in agriculture. Social Indicators Research, 142, 801–821. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zaremba, K., et al. (2024). Women’s empowerment measurement: Mixed methods insights. World Development Perspectives, 33, 100530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Exploration of Stakeholders Perceived Mitigation Measures for Addressing Sanitation Challenges in George Compound in Lusaka Zambia
• Public Participation in Sustainable Development Programs: Examining Public Participation Methods and Levels at Pustaka Negeri Sarawak
• Responding to Climate Change through Livelihood Diversification: Implications of Household Economic Well-Being in Coastal Greater Accra
• Teacher Character Development Through Virtue and Eudaimonia: Insights from Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
• Transformation of Muslim Friendly Hospitality: An Overview of Shariah Compliant Tourism Development in Malaysia