The Mediating Role of Student Engagement in the Relationship Between Teacher Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Physical Performance Among Physical Education Student

In recent years, the physical fitness of university students has declined, prompting China to promote the digital transformation of education. Although the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework has been shown to improve instructional effectiveness, how teachers’ digital competence translates into students’ physical performance remains insufficiently understood. This study examined the relationships among teacher TPACK, student engagement, and physical performance among undergraduate physical education (PE) students in China. It also tested the mediating role of student engagement based on the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) model, which explains how external stimuli influence internal states and lead to observable outcomes. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2025 and January 2026 with 872 PE undergraduates from four universities in Guangdong Province, China. Teacher TPACK, student engagement, and physical performance were measured using validated instruments. Structural equation modeling (Smart PLS 4) was used to examine both direct and mediating effects. Teacher TPACK significantly predicted student engagement (β = 0.780, p < 0.001) and physical performance (β = 0.337, p < 0.001). Student engagement also had a positive effect on physical performance (β = 0.321, p < 0.001) and partially mediated the relationship between TPACK and physical performance (β = 0.250, p < 0.001). The model explained 60.8% of the variance in student engagement and 38.6% of the variance in physical performance. Teacher TPACK enhances student engagement and physical performance, supporting the applicability of the S–O–R model in physical education contexts.

Physical education, physical performance, student engagement, TPACK

1. Tsinghua University. (2024). College Students’ Physical Activity and Physical Fitness Data Set (2014-2023). National Population Health Science Data Warehouse (PHDA); [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ladwig, M. A., Vazou, S., & Ekkekakis, P. (2018). “My best memory is when I was done with it”: PE memories are associated with adult sedentary behavior. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 3(16), 119-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bessa, C., Hastie, P., Rosado, A., & Mesquita, I. (2021). Sport education and traditional teaching: Influence on students’ empowerment and self-confidence in high school physical education classes. Sustainability, 13(2), 578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Zhou, C., Wu, D., Li, Y., Yang, H. H., Man, S., & Chen, M. (2023). The role of student engagement in promoting teachers’ continuous learning of TPACK: Based on a stimulus-organism-response framework and an integrative model of behavior prediction. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2207-2227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kerner, C., & Goodyear, V. A. (2019). Technology, pedagogy and physical education. In Debates in physical education (pp. 295-309). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, H. S. (2019). Teachers' TPACK Levels and Students’ Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of research in education and science, 5(1), 283-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & education, 214, 105024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zahroh, L. (2025). Effectiveness of the implementation of an innovative problem-based learning (PBL) model based on TPACK to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes in IPAS. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 525-530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Susilawati, S., Supriyatno, T., Yasin, A. F., Chakim, A., & Putri, C. A. (2025). The Effect of TPACK-Based Contextual Teaching and Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes. Educational Process: International Journal, 16, e2025279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hamid, F. A., & Ahmad, N. J. (2024). A SLR: Integrating Technology in Mathematics Education: The Impact of TPACK, Professional Development, and Student Engagement on Learning Outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies, 31-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Goldberg, P., Schwerter, J., Seidel, T., Müller, K., & Stürmer, K. (2021). How does learners’ behavior attract preservice teachers’ attention during teaching? Teaching and teacher education, 97, 103213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lin, S. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2018). Assessing college student engagement: Development and validation of the student course engagement scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(7), 694-708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lochbaum, M., Stoner, E., Hefner, T., Cooper, S., Lane, A. M., & Terry, P. C. (2022). Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature. PloS one, 17(2), e0263408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ihsan, F., Nasrulloh, A., Nugroho, S., & Yuniana, R. (2024). Mental training strategies in improving sport performance: A literature review. Journal of Athletic Performance, 24(3), 15-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cui, Z., Song, Y., & Du, X. (2024). Multilevel modeling of technology use, student engagement, and fitness outcomes in physical education classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1458899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hamid, F. A., & Ahmad, N. J. (2024). A SLR: Integrating Technology in Mathematics Education: The Impact of TPACK, Professional Development, and Student Engagement on Learning Outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies, 31-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students’ engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Cross-sectional survey research. Medsurg nursing, 25(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Brito, J., Maculan, N., Lila, M., & Montenegro, F. (2010). An exact algorithm for the stratification problem with proportional allocation. Optimization letters, 4(2), 185-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK. xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of educational psychology, 100(4), 765. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 96(2), 236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lee, H. Y., & Chung, C. Y. (2025). Physical Education Pre-Service Teachers as Design Thinkers: Exploring the Role of Divergent and Convergent Thinking and TPACK. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101698. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Max, A. L., Lukas, S., & Weitzel, H. (2022). The relationship between self-assessment and performance in learning TPACK: Are self-assessments a good way to support preservice teachers’ learning?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 1160-1172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gong, J., Castro, D. R., & Chen, Y. (2024). Influence of technology integration on students’ engagement on physical education. J. Educ. Educ. Res, 9(2), 265-274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mulyana, D., Suherman, A., Komarudin, K., Abduljabar, B., & Mulyana, F. R. (2025). Integrating technology in physical education: The impact of TPACK-based tactical and technical approaches on football skills and student motivation. Physical Education and Sports: Studies and Research, 4(1), 71-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O. M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of educational psychology, 100(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Steinmayr, R., Meiǹer, A., Weideinger, A. F., & Wirthwein, L. (2014). Academic achievement (pp. 9780199756810-0108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students' engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School psychology review, 46(3), 239-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517-528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Combined and Isolated Effect of SAQ Training and Resistance Training on Agility and Flexibility among Badminton Players
• Importance of Ashtanga Yoga in Physical Education and Mental Health
• Navigating the Path of Exceptional Parenting: An Exploration of Experiences among Parents of Para-Athletes
• Effects of a 12-Week Football Intervention on Mental Health and Psychological Resilience in Secondary School Students
• Academic Achievement, Enthusiasm and Attitude of High School Students Regarding Quizizz as an Educational Gamification Tool for Physics