Career Development, Professional Practices, Commitment, and Work Performance among Teaching Staff in Higher Education Institution

Authors

Cherelen D. Gajita

Assistant Professor, PHINMA Cagayan De Oro College (Philippines)

Nenita I. Prado

Liceo de Cagayan University, Cagayan de Oro City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300013

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 173-186

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-06

Accepted: 2026-03-11

Published: 2026-03-24

Abstract

Faculty work performance remains a critical determinant of institutional effectiveness and educational quality in higher education institutions (HEIs). This study examined the levels of career development, professional practices, organizational commitment, and work performance among teaching staff, as well as the relationships among these variables. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected from teaching staff in a selected higher education institution. Results indicated high levels across career development, professional practices, commitment, and work performance. Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships among work performance, career development, professional practices, and organizational commitment. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening instructional practices and fostering commitment as key mechanisms for improving faculty performance. The study provides empirical insights that may guide institutional strategies for faculty development, performance enhancement, and instructional quality improvement.

Keywords

work performance, professional practices, career development, organizational commitment, higher education

Downloads

References

1. UNESCO. (2016). Global education monitoring report 2016: Education for people and planet – Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Morales, V. J. G., Martín-Rojas, R., & Lardón-López, M. E. (2018). Influence of social media technologies on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(3), 345–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Liu, X., & Krutkrongphan, S. (2023). The influence of self-efficacy on the work performance of teachers in rural primary schools. Procedia of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Yalley, C., Adu, K., & Agbenyo, F. (2020). Instructional practices and student engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clinton, J., Hattie, J., & Dixon, H. (2016). Teacher preparation, self-efficacy, and student achievement: A review of research. Educational Research Review, 19, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Celik, B. (2017). Career development of teachers: Importance and benefits. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Campoy, R. W., & Xu, Y. (2018). Using video analysis aligned with the Danielson Framework to improve teacher candidates’ instructional practices. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45(3), 51–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 255–311). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1522781. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14 Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Campoy, R. W., & Xu, Y. (2018). Using video analysis aligned with the Danielson Framework to improve teacher candidates’ instructional practices. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45(3), 51–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. White, C. A. (2017). Teacher instructional practices and student achievement: An application of the Danielson Framework for Teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2017.07.1.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L., & Maude, P. (2017). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), 12–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ghimire, S., & Timilsina, R. (2022). Motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among teachers in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n4p45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sibomana, E., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development and job performance in secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(23), 50–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Al Asmari, A. (2016). Continuous professional development of English language teachers: Perceptions and practices. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 117–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ndayambaje, I., Ntawiha, P., & Nzabalirwa, W. (2024). Instructional supervision and teachers’ professional practices in public secondary schools in Gasabo District. Rwandan Journal of Education, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yalley, C. E., & Fynn, A. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of economics teachers’ instructional practices in senior high schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(6), 123–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Poliquit, D. B., et al. (2018). Grasping the organizational commitment of employees in a higher educational institution in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lim, J. R. (2024). Work motivation, organizational commitment, and work performance of teachers at Bulan National High School: A basis for an in-house training program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis.\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saleem, A., Aslam, S., Yin, H. B., & Rao, C. (2020). Principal leadership styles and teacher job performance: Viewpoint of middle management. Sustainability, 12(8), 3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083390 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Felix, R. C., & Abrogena, J. B. (2024). Continuous professional development and teaching performance among science teachers. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 18, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Alog, M. A., & Oco, R. M. (2025). Structured professional development programs and teachers’ competency enhancement in higher education institutions. Journal of Educational Development and Practice, 9(1), 32–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Acedo, C., Amadio, M., & Opertti, R. (2019). Teacher professional practices and instructional quality in contemporary education systems. Prospects, 48(1–2), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09438-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Reyes, M. P., & Cruz, L. M. (2021). Professional development and classroom management competence among secondary school teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Dinc, M. S. (2017). Organizational commitment components and job performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 78, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hidayat, R., & Sari, N. P. (2017). The influence of teachers’ teaching performance on students’ learning motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1038a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mduma, N., & Mkulu, D. G. (2021). Influence of teachers’ professional practices on students’ academic performance in secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.842398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles