Student-Teacher Interpersonal Relationship, Psychological and Subjective Well-Being, and Academic Performance of Public and Private Secondary School Students in Cavite

Authors

ThankGod Amukele Mahel

Adventist University of the Philippines (Philippines)

Christian Ndede

Cavite State University, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300177

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 2439-2454

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-12

Accepted: 2026-03-17

Published: 2026-03-30

Abstract

This study explored the teacher-student interpersonal relationship and its influence on the psychological and subjective well-being, and students’ academic performance/achievements in the overall academic weighted grade point average (GPA) of high school students in public and private schools in Trece Martires City School District, Philippines. The descriptive-quantitative research design, the purposive sampling technique, and stratified sampling techniques to stratify the respondents based on their grade levels. Four hundred and ten (n=410) respondents participated in the study. The study data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The frequency and percentage, mean, and standard deviation tools were used in the data treatment, while tables were used to visualize the results. The findings revealed both moderate and low levels of teacher-student interpersonal relationships. The research also showed a very high level of satisfaction with life about their families, friends, and belief in themselves. Similarly, a high level of satisfaction with their school and living environment was found. The research revealed that the construct joy for learning had a very high mean score, while school connectedness had a high level of academic efficacy. The findings on psychological well-being disclosed an extremely high level of psychological flourishing. This study concludes with implications for secondary school educators, basic education institution stakeholders, program developers, and curricula designers to consider the mental, emotional, behavioral, and interpersonal relationships between teachers and students as fundamental to their overall well-being and academic performance.

Keywords

Student-Teacher Interpersonal Relationship, Psychological and Subjective Well-Being, Academic Performance

Downloads

References

1. Adewale, B., Jegede, F., Okubote, F., & Olagbadegun, M. (2021). Impact Of Classroom Environments on the Academic Performance of Architecture Students in Covenant University. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 665, 12017. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., and Trautwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learn. Instr. 58, 126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, M. R., Ashraf, B. N., & Shuai, C. (2019). Teachers' Conflict-Inducing Attitudes and Their Repercussions on Students' Psychological Health and Learning Outcomes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson D., Graham A. (2016). Improving student well-being: having a say at school. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 27, 348–366. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ansari, A., Hofkens, T. L., & Pianta, R. C. (2020). Teacher-student relationships across the first seven years of education and adolescent outcomes. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 71, 101–120. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Antaramian, S., & Lee, J. (2017). The importance of very high life satisfaction for students’ academic success. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.130762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationship to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baños, J. H., Noah, J. P., & Harada, C. N. (2019). Predictors of student engagement in learning communities. J. Med. Edu. Curr. Dev. 6, 1–6. doi: 10.1177/2382120519840330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhatti, A., Pathan, H., Ahmad, A., & Hassan, A. (2020). Impact of learner-learner rapport on L2 learning: a study of public sector universities in Sindh. Pak. Asian EFL J. 27, 204–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bilgiç, S. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde okul yaşam kalitesi algısının arkadaşlara bağlılık ve empatik sınıf atmosferi değişkenleriyle ilişkisinin incelenmesi (Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Brookhart, S., Guskey, T., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J., Smith, L., Smith, J., & Welsh, M. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the Most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bodur, H.O., Gao, T., & Grohmann, B. (2014), The ethical attribute stigma: Understanding when ethical attributes ımprove consumer responses to product evaluations. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 167-177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Carmona-Halty, M., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2019). Good relationships, good performance: The mediating role of psychological capital–a three-wave study among students. Front. Psychol. 10, 306–320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cavioni, V. & Zanetti, M.A. (2015). Social-emotional learning and students' transition from kindergarten to primary school in Italy. In H. Askell-Williams (Ed.), Transforming the Future of Learning with Educational Research (pp. 241-258). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cefai, C., Clouder, C., Antognazza, D., Cavioni, Cavioni, V., Heys, B., . . . Solborg, C. (2014). From Pisa to Santander: A statement on children’s growth and well-being. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(2), 86-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chamizo-Nieto, M. T., Arrivillaga, C., Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2021). The role of emotional intelligence, the teacher-student relationship, and flourishing on academic performance in adolescents: a moderated mediation Study. Front. Psychol. 12:67. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chen, J. (2016). Understanding teacher emotions: the development of a teacher emotion inventory. Teach. Teach. Educ. 55, 68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Costello, E. J., He, J. P., Sampson, N. A., Kessler, R. C., & Merikangas, K. R. (2014). Services for adolescents with psychiatric disorders: 12-month data from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 65(3), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Daniel, S. S., & Goldston, D. B. (2012). Hopelessness and Lack of Connectedness to Others as Risk Factors for Suicidal Behavior Across the Lifespan: Implications for Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.05.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century teacher-education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Diener, E. D., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Soc Indic Res 97:143–156. DOI 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 39, 391–406. doi: 10.1177/008124630903900402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Diener, E. D., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305-314. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Dogan, U., & Celik, E. (2014). Examining the factors contributing to students’ life satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.14 (6). Educational Consultancy and Research Center. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.6.2058. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Engels, M. C., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K. K., & Verschueren, K. (2019). Students’ academic and emotional adjustment during the transition from primary to secondary school: a cross-lagged study. J. Sch. Psychol. 76, 140–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ettekal, I., & Shi, Q. (2020). Developmental trajectories of teacher-student relationships and longitudinal associations with children’s conduct problems from Grades 1 to 12. J. Sch. Psychol. 82, 17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Eraslan-Capan, B. (2016). Social Connectedness and Flourishing: The Mediating Role of Hopelessness. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(5): 933-940, 2016 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fan, F.A. (2012). Teacher: students’ interpersonal relationships and students’ academic achievements in social studies. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice. Vol.18:4, 483-490. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2012.696048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Farhah, I., Saleh, A. Y., & Safitri, S. (2021). The role of student-teacher relationship to teacher subjective well-being as moderated by teaching experience. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 267~274 ISSN: 2089-9823 DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.18330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fredricks, J.A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55 (2), pp. 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist, 68, 814 – 822. doi:10.1037/a0033584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Frisch, M. B. (2000). Improving mental and physical health care through quality of life therapy and assessment. In E. Diener & D. R. Rahtz (eds.) Advances in quality of life theory and research, 207-241. Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Frisby, B. N. (2019). The influence of emotional contagion on student perceptions of instructor rapport, emotional support, emotion work, valence, and cognitive learning. Commun. Stud. 70, 492–506. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2019.1622584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Furlong, M. J., You, S., Renshaw, T. L., Smith, D. C., & O'Malley, M. D. (2014). Preliminary development and validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey for secondary school students. Social Indicators Research. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1007/ s11205-013-0373-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. García-Moya, I., Brooks, F., & Moreno, C. (2020). Humanizing and conducive to learning: An adolescent students’ perspective on the central attributes of positive relationships with teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00413-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Georgiades, K., Duncan, L., Wang, L., Comeau, J., Boyle, M. H., & 2014 Ontario Child Health Study Team (2019). Six-Month Prevalence of Mental Disorders and Service Contacts among Children and Youth in Ontario: Evidence from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 64(4), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719830024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 293–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Green, J. G. McLaughlin, K. A., Alegria, M., et al. (2013). School mental health resources and adolescent mental health service use. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.03.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Heatly, M. C., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2017). Parent-and teacher-child relationships and engagement at school entry: mediating, interactive, and transactional associations across contexts. Developmental Psychology. 53, 1042–1062. doi: 10.1037/ dev0000310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Schultz, P. W. (2016). Protégé perceptions of high mentorship quality depend on shared values more than on demographic match. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 450-468. doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1246405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Psychometric properties of two brief measures of children’s life satisfaction: The students’ life satisfaction scale (SLSS) and the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). For Indicators of Positive Development Conference March 12-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Jerome, E. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Teacher–child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Soc. Dev. 18, 915–945. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kaminski, J., Puddy, R., Hall, D., Cashman, S., Crosby, A., & Ortega, L. (2010). The relative influence of different domains of social connectedness on self-directed violence in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kaya, H. Bodur, G., & Yalniz, N. (2014). The relationship between high school students’ attitudes toward future and subjective well-being. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 3869–3873. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Kern M. L., Waters L. E., Aldler A., White M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: application of the PERMA framework. J. Posit. Psychol. 10, 262–271. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.936962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kidger J., Brockman R., Tilling K., Campbell R., Ford T., Araya R., King M., & Gunnell D. (2016). Teachers’ wellbeing and depressive symptoms, and associated risk factors: A large cross-sectional study in English secondary schools. J. Affect. Disord. 192:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. King, L., Lyubormirsky, S., & Diener, E. (2003). The benefits of happiness. Manuscript submitted for publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). Gender differences in the motivational profiles of students in mathematics, physics, and language courses. Educational Research and Evaluation. 22(3-4):214-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611 .2016.1243216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Krane, V., Ness, O., Holter-Sorensen, N., Karlsson, B., & Binder, P.-E. (2017). “‘You Notice that There Is Something Positive about Going to School’: How Teachers’ Kindness Can Promote Positive Teacher-Student Relationships in Upper Secondary School.” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 22 (4): 377–389. doi:10.1080/02673843.2016.1202843. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Kristjánsson, Á.L, & Einarsdóttir, J. (2018). Gender differences in the association between student-teacher relationships and student well-being during school lessons. Educational Psychology. 38(7):853- 871. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410 .2018.1469469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Lammers, W. J., & Byrd, A. A. (2019). Student gender and instructor gender as predictors of instructor-student rapport. Teach. Psychol. 46, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. León, J., & Liew, J. (2017). Profiles of adolescents’ peer and teacher relatedness: Differences in well-being and academic achievement across latent groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 54 (2) (2017), pp. 41-50. Doi.10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lewis, A. D. (2010). Facilitating student engagement: The importance of life satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, College of Arts and Sciences, Columbia). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3402795). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Li, L., & Yang, S. (2021). Exploring the influence of teacher-student interaction on university students’ self-efficacy in the flipped classroom. J. Educ. Learn. 10, 84–90. doi: 10.5539/jel.v10n2p84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mainhard, T., Oudman, S., Hornstra, L., Bosker, R. J., & Goetz, T. (2018). Student emotions in class: the relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learn. Instruct. 53, 109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2017.07.011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Mabunda, N. R., & Mulovhedzi, S. A. (2020). The impact of teacher-learners’ interpersonal relationship on learners’ academic success in a primary school of Soutpansberg West Circuit. Gender Behav. 18, 16034–16041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. McCormick, M. P., O'Connor, E. E., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. G. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach. J. Sch. Psychol. 51, 611–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. McCullough, G., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). Life events, self-concept, and adolescents’ positive subjective well-being. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 281–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Mensah, B., & Koomson, E. (2020). Linking teacher-student relationship to academic achievement of senior high school students. Soc. Edu. Res. 2, 102–108. doi: 10.37256/ser.122020140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. O’Connor, E. E., Dearing, E., & Collins, B. A. (2011). Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 48:1,120-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Opre D., Pintea S., Opre A., & Bertea M. (2018). Measuring adolescents’ subjective well-being in an educational context: development and validation of a multidimensional instrument. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies 18, 161–180. doi: 10.24193/jebp.2018.2.20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Ornaghi, V., Pepe, A., & Grazzani, I. (2016). False-belief understanding and language ability mediate the relationship between emotion comprehension and prosocial orientation in preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Pakarinen, E., Silinskas, G., Hamre, B. K., Metsäpelto, R. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., et al. (2018). Cross-lagged associations between problem behaviors and teacher-student relationships in early adolescence. Journal of. Early Adolescent. 38, 1100–1141. doi: 10.1177/0272431617714328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Polit, D. F., & Hungler, P. B. (1999) Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 6th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Power, M. A., Graham, A., Fitzgerald, R., Thomas, N., & White, N. E. (2018). Well-being in Schools: What Do Students Tell Us? Australian Educational Researcher 45 (4): 515–531. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0273-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Prati, G., Cicognani, E., & Albanesi, C. (2017). The Impact of Sense of Community in the School, Social Skills, and Exposure to Aggression and Victimization on Students’ Well-Being. Social Indicators Research. 2017; 140(2):637-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205- 017-1808-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Quinn, P. D., & Duckworth, A. (2007). Happiness and Academic Achievement: Evidence for Reciprocal Causality. In The Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, 24 (27.5), p. 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L., Breitmeyer, S., Keßler, S., Herrmann, E., & Regner. N. (2016). “Students’ Perception of ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Teachers: Results of a Qualitative Thematic Analysis with German Adolescents.” International Journal of Educational Research 75: 31–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Renshaw, T. L. (2015). A replication of the technical adequacy of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(8), 757-768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Renshaw, T. L., & Arslan, G. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire with Turkish adolescents: A generalizability study. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 31(2), 139-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Renshaw, T. L., & Bolognino, S. J. (2016). The College Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire: A brief, multidimensional measure of undergraduate’s co-vitality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 463-484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Renshaw T. L., Long A. C. J., Cook C. R. (2015). Assessing adolescents’ positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student Subjective Well-being Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 534-552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Renshaw T. L. (2015a). A replication of the technical adequacy of the Student Subjective Well-being Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 757-768. doi:10.1177/0734282915580885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Reis, F. A. & Cunha, J. M. (2023). Student-Teacher Relationships and Human Flourishing: Preliminary Findings from Brazil. Advances in Research Volume 24, Issue 6, Page 205-212. DOI: 10.9734/AIR/2023/v24i61002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Roorda, D. L., Jorgensen, T. D., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2019). Different teachers, different relationships? Student-teacher relationships and engagement in secondary education. Learn. Ind. Diff. 75, 1–15. lindif.2019.101761 doi: 10. 1016/j. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Sarı, M., Ötünç, E., & Erceylan, H. (2007). Liselerde okul yaşam kalitesi: Adana ili örneği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 13(2), 297-320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Schonert-Reichl K. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. Future of Children, 27, 137–155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44219025.pdf. doi: 10.1353/foc.2017.0007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Seligman M. E., Csikszentmihalyi M. (2014). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Shephard, D., Falk, D., & Mendenhall, M. (2023). My teachers make me feel alive: The contribution of student-teacher relationships to student well-being in accelerated education programs in South Sudan and Uganda. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 31:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925 .2023.2170168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Spilt, J. L., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2022). Teacher-Child Relationships: A Chronological Review of Prominent Attachment-Based Themes. Front. Educ. 7:920985. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.920985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Satici, S.A Uysal R. & Akın. A. (2013). Investigating the relationship between flourishing and self-compassion: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Belgica, 4, 85-99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Syahabuddin, K., Fhonna, R., & Maghfirah, U. (2020). Teacher-student relationships: an influence on the English teaching-learning process. Stud. English Lang. Educ. 7, 438–451. doi: 10.24815/siele.v7i2.16922. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Tawana, P. M. (2020). Teacher-learner relationships and the effect on student learning at selected secondary schools in the Khomas region. Doctoral dissertation. Windhoek: University of Namibia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Telef, B. B. (2011). The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(3), 374-384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Tobbell, J. & O’Donnell, V. (2013). The formation of interpersonal and learning relationships in the transition from primary to secondary school: Students, teachers, and school context. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Thorlacius, O., & Gudmundsson, E. (2019). The effectiveness of the children’s emotional adjustment scale (ceas) in screening for mental health problems in middle childhood. School Mental Health, 11(3), 400-412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Tian, L., Pi, L., Huebner, E. S., & Du, M. (2016) Gratitude and Adolescents’ Subjective Well-Being in School: The Multiple Mediating Roles of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction at School. Front. Psychol. 7:1409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Van Zyl, L. E., & Stander, M. W. (2019). Flourishing Interventions 2.0: a practical guide to student development. Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts. 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-20020-6_20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Vander Weele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.;114(31): 8148-8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170 2996114 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Mabbe, E. (2017). Children’s daily well-being: The role of mothers’, teachers’, and siblings’ autonomy support and psychological control. Dev. Psychol. 53, 237–251. doi: 10.1037/dev0000218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Voight, A., Austin, G., & Hanson, T. (2013). A climate for academic success: How school climate distinguishes schools that are beating the achievement odds. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Retrieved from http://www.wested.org/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Wang Y. L., Derakhshan A., Zhang L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status, and future directions. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Wei, M., Den Brok, P., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Teacher interpersonal behavior and student achievement in English as a Foreign Language classrooms in China. Learning Environments Research, 12, 157 – 174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten-year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders.Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Woodis, C. A. (2019). Teacher-Student Relationships and Their Impact on Student Achievement in School [Masterʼs thesis, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Wubbels, T. (1993). Teacher-student relationships in mathematics and mathematics classes. (What research says to the mathematics and mathematics teacher, No. 11). Perth: National Key Centre for School Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Front. Psychol. 12:2623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. You, S., Furlong, M. J., Felix, E., & O'Malley, M. D. (2014). Validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey for five sociocultural groups: Multigroup invariance and latent mean analyses. Manuscript under review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Zhang, Q. (2022). The Role of Teachers’ Interpersonal Behaviors in Learners’ Academic Achievements. Front. Psychol. 13:921832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Zheng, F. (2022). Fostering Students’ Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Teacher Interpersonal Behavior and Student-Teacher Relationships. Front. Psychol. 12:796728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles