Inclusive Education: A Comparative Study of General and Resource Teachers’ Understanding

Inclusive education has emerged as a key reform within contemporary educational systems, aiming to ensure equitable learning opportunities for children with disabilities (CWDs). Teachers’ understanding, beliefs, and professional preparedness are critical determinants of successful inclusive practices. The present study examined and compared the understanding of inclusive education among general teachers and resource teachers working in mainstream schools under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Maharashtra, India. A quantitative descriptive survey design grounded in the positivist paradigm was employed. Data were collected from a stratified random sample of 200 teachers (100 general teachers and 100 resource teachers) using a researcher-developed instrument, PINNACLE, comprising six validated and reliable subscales. Descriptive statistics and inferential analysis using the z test were applied. Results indicated no statistically significant difference between general and resource teachers in their overall understanding of inclusive education, including conceptual and component-based aspects. Both groups demonstrated moderate to high levels of understanding. The findings highlight the positive influence of policy initiatives, professional training, and experiential learning on teachers’ understanding of inclusive education and underscore the need for sustained professional development to strengthen inclusive practices.

inclusive education; general teachers; resource teachers

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of School Education and Literacy. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hodkinson, A., & Devarakonda, C. (2009). Conceptions of inclusion and inclusive education: A critical examination of teachers’ thinking. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701284625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kumar, K., & Rao, V. (2019). Teacher preparedness for inclusive education in India. Journal of Indian Education, 45(2), 23–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2010). Inclusive education: Supporting diversity in the classroom. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sawhney, S., & Bansal, S. (2014). Inclusive education in India: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Disability Studies, 1(2), 13–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study