Assessing the Influence of Digital Technology on the Academic Performance of Learners

This study examined the relationship between digital technology use and learners' academic performance in the San Fernando II District, Division of Bukidnon, during the School Year 2025–2026. A descriptive–correlational research design was employed using a researcher-developed questionnaire administered to 159 teachers. Digital technology use was measured by total screen time, type of technology used, multitasking across multiple media devices, and frequency of video game play. At the same time, academic performance was assessed across five core subjects.
Findings revealed a high extent of digital technology use among learners, while academic performance was generally rated as very satisfactory. Correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant but weak relationship between total screen time and academic performance (r = .166, p = .036), as well as a weak overall relationship (r = .161, p = .043). Other variables, including device type, multitasking, and video game frequency, were not significantly related to academic performance.

Assessing, Influence, Digital Technology, Academic Performance

1. Frontiers in Education. (2022). Educational technology and student performance: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 916502. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. King, R. (2021). Media use, attention, mental health, and academic performance among 8 to 12-year-old children. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Muppalla, S. K., Vuppalapati, S., Pullagura, A. V. R., & Sreedhar, S. (2023). Effects of excessive screen time on child development: An updated review and strategies for management. Cureus, 15(6), e40651. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Oaten, J. (2024). Combating the attention span crisis in our students. Santa Maria College Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Soriano, M. L. (2025). Assessing the impact of technology integration on intermediate learners' attention span. Journal of Innovative Pedagogy, 10(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Supriyanto, A. (2025). Gadget use and learning attention among primary school pupils—Journal of Educational Technology Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). Technology use and cognitive development among children. OECD Education Working Papers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study