Exploring the Relationship between Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension: A Study Based on VLT and PET Scores among Mongolian University Students

This study investigates the relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension among 75 Mongolian university students using Paul Nation’s Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) and the PET reading test. The aim was to determine whether students' receptive vocabulary knowledge predicts their ability to comprehend written English. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, group comparison, and linear regression analyses were performed. Results showed a statistically significant but modest positive correlation (r = 0.24, p = 0.038) between vocabulary size and reading scores. Learners with more than 5000 word families tended to perform better, though the difference was not statistically significant. Regression analysis revealed that vocabulary size accounted for 5.7% of the variance in reading comprehension scores. These findings suggest that vocabulary knowledge contributes meaningfully to reading ability, although it alone does not fully explain performance. The study highlights the need for structured vocabulary instruction in EFL contexts and calls for further research into additional factors affecting reading development among Mongolian learners.

Vocabulary size; reading comprehension; Mongolian EFL learners; PET test

1. Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive listening practice and input enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00298.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cobb, T. (2007). Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 38–63. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zhang, L. J., & Anual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension: The case of secondary school students learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208091140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99–109). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bai, Z., & Guo, W. (2020). Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension in Chinese EFL learners. System, 88, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Barrow, J., Nakanishi, Y., & Ishino, H. (1999). Assessing Japanese college students' vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking questionnaire. System, 27(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00017-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (2005). Six principles for teaching foreign language vocabulary. JALT Journal, 27(2), 7–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1984.tb00126.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Carrell, P. L. (1988). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 239–256). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chen, Q., & Zhang, J. (2019). Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3-4), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej26/ej26a4/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lee, S. Y. (2004). The relationship between EFL learners’ extensive reading and vocabulary acquisition. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(1), 23–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Education, 38(3), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjær, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nation, P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zhang, D. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01398.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study