Instructional Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness as Predictors of Teaching Motivation among Teachers in Private Elementary Schools

Authors

Godivah Irish A. Reyes

Department of Education, Holy Cross of Davao College, Davao City, Region XI (Davao Region) (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300252

Subject Category: Educational Management

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 3355-3365

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-14

Accepted: 2026-03-21

Published: 2026-04-02

Abstract

Globally, teacher motivation remains a challenge. This study determined the significance of instructional competence, autonomy, and relatedness as predictors of teacher motivation. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational predictive approach, involving the entire population of 159 private elementary teachers using a total enumeration sampling technique yielded results that the predictive model for teaching motivation (MT = -0.242 + 0.073x1 + 0.316x2 + 0.663x3) is significant supporting the Self Determination Theory. Further research is recommended to examine additional variables that may explain the remaining 33.8% of variance in teaching motivation not accounted for by this study’s predictors. Qualitative research may also be conducted to identify themes that could inform and support future investigations.

Keywords

Instructional competence, autonomy, relatedness, predictors of teaching motivation

Downloads

References

1. Abdulrahman, A. S., & Hui, X. (2018). Implication of motivation theories on teachers’ performance in the context of the education system in Tanzania. International Journal of Secondary Education, 6(3), 46–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asis, J. M. N., Caballes, D. G., & Ortiz Jr., O. E. (2023). Instructional competence of public secondary school teachers in the district of Naic: Basis for instructional enhancement program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ba’aba, A. A. (2024). Influence of teachers’ motivation on the academic performance of students in economics in Potiskum Local Government Area of Yobe State. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Science, Technology and Innovation (IJMRSTI), 3(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carriedo, A., Cecchini, J. A., Méndez-Giménez, A., Sanabrias-Moreno, D., & González, C. (2023). Impact of teachers’ autonomy support in students’ basic psychological needs, intrinsic motivation and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Children, 10(3), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A self‑determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cilalı, B., Michou, A., & Daumiller, M. (2024). Pathways to need‑supportive teaching: Teaching mindsets and motivation to teach. The Asia‑Pacific Education Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00885-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 416–436). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fradkin-Hayslip, A. (2023). Teacher autonomy, motivation, and job satisfaction: Elementary teachers’ perceptions. Elementary Education Online, 20(2), 198–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guo, Q., & Xu, Y. (2024). Student teachers’ motivation to teach: The roles of basic psychological needs, teaching self‑efficacy, and teaching emotions from a variable‑ and person‑centered approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guiffrida, D., Gouveia, A., Wall, A., & Seward, D. (2008). Development and validation of the Need for Relatedness at College Questionnaire (NRC-Q). Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hellebaut, S., Haerens, L., Vanderlinde, R., & De Cocker, K. (2023). Burnout, motivation, and (de-)motivating teaching style in different phases of a teaching career. Teaching and Teacher Education, 129, Article 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kibuchi, S., et al. (2024). [Article title]. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smae017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A. L., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762–768. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371985656_Sampling_Methods_in_Research_A_Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mirwoba, S. E. (2024). Drivers of motivation among instructors in higher education in Kenya. SAUT Multidisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(1), 56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rubinfeld, D. L. (2000). Reference guide on multiple regression. In Reference manual on scientific evidence (pp. 179–425). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sultana, R., Faruk, M., Islam, M. S., & Khaled, M. A. (2025). Does motivation theory really play any significant role in explaining university teachers’ performance? Understanding the Bangladeshi context. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sala, G. (2023). Motivation of high school teachers, and its effects on their level of performance and turn-over rate. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Siacor, K. H., Ng, C., & Liu, J. (2024). Fostering student motivation and engagement through teacher autonomy support: A self‑determination theory perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 583–598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Suárez-Mesa, A. M., & Gómez, R. L. (2024). Does teachers’ motivation have an impact on students’ scientific literacy and motivation? An empirical study in Colombia with data from PISA 2015. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12(1), 1–? https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00190-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tagud, C. J. C. (2025). The influence of autonomy, competence and relatedness in reading on senior high school students’ motivation to read. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 8(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajl2c/2025/v8i2234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tolentino, A. B., Cruz, E. C., & Ablaza, G. M. T. (2023). Self-efficacy, interest, and effort indicators in the teaching motivation of public senior high school teachers in the Philippines. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 7(10), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2023.v07i10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vangrieken, K., Grosemans, I., Dochy, F., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher autonomy and collaboration: A paradox? Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ autonomy and collaborative attitude. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. van Witteloostuijn, A., Vanderstraeten, J., Slabbinck, H., Dejardin, M., Hermans, J., & Coreynen, W. (2022). From explanation of the past to prediction of the future: A comparative and predictive research design in the social sciences. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vedder‑Weiss, D., Roth, I., & Mishaeli, R. (2024). Supporting teacher reflection and motivation through collaborative professional development: A self‑determination theory perspective. Self‑Determination Theory Research. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024_Vedder-WeissRoth-Mishaeli_TeacherReflection.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2024). A systematic review and meta‑analysis of self-determination theory-based interventions in the education context. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles