Integrating Design Thinking within the R2D2 Instructional Design Model: A Pedagogical Framework for Conceptual Design Process in Design Education

Design Thinking is widely adopted in design education to foster creativity and innovation; however, its pedagogical implementation often lacks instructional clarity and consistent approaches to learning design and assessment. Design Thinking is frequently presented as a sequence of stages, which can obscure the underlying learning demands and provide limited guidance for educators. At the same time, instructional design models offer structure but are rarely aligned with the iterative and exploratory nature of design learning. This article proposes an integrated pedagogical framework that aligns Design Thinking with the ‘Read, Reflect, Display, Do’ (R2D2) instructional design model. Using a conceptual framework development approach, Design Thinking phases are analysed in terms of their dominant cognitive and social learning demands, while R2D2 is interpreted as flexible instructional engagement modes rather than a linear sequence. The framework specifies phase-to-mode alignments, associated learning activities, observable learning artefacts, and indicative educator and learner roles. By making reflection, representation, and action explicit, the framework supports more coherent pedagogy, inclusive participation, and transparent assessment of creativity and innovation in conceptual design education.

design thinking pedagogy, instructional design, pedagogical framework, conceptual design education.

1. Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alt, D., Kapshuk, Y., & Dekel, H. (2023). Promoting perceived creativity and innovative behavior: Benefits of future problem-solving programs for higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2022.101201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alvarado, L. F. (2025). Design thinking as an active teaching methodology in higher education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1462938. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2025.1462938/BIBTEX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baker, F. W., & Moukhliss, S. (2020). Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design. Review of Education, 8(1), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bonk, C. ., & Zhang, K. (2008). Empowering Online Learning: 100+ Activities for Reading, Reflecting, Displaying and Doing. https://hubl.hu.nl/archive/file/18178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bonk, C. J., & Zhang, K. (2007). Introducing the R2D2 Model: Online Learning for the Diverse Learners of This World. Distance Education, 27(2), 249–264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cuesta-Hincapie, C. (2025). Discovering the meaning of creativity in instructional design. A co-creation and concept mapping approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-09996-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R., & Gerber, E. (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications problems arising from the ill-definition of DBR. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 317--324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Feng, X., Figueiredo, S., Mattila, P., Keskinen, M., & Björklund, T. (2025). Navigating Dilemmas: university educators’ journeys in creativity teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(5), 1235–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2436359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ferreira, J., & Christiaans, H. (2012). Teaching conceptual design teaching conceptual design. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION, September, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fitriyah, I. J., Saputro, S., & Sajidan. (2025). Research Trends in Design Thinking Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2024. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.14.2.381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Galdames-Calderón, M., Stavnskær Pedersen, A., & Rodriguez-Gomez, D. (2024). Systematic Review: Revisiting Challenge-Based Learning Teaching Practices in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI14091008/S1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gómez Puente, S. M., Van Eijck, M., & Jochems, W. (2013). A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: A search for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-012-9212-X/TABLES/5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Haifa, F. A., & Bin Mubayrik, N. M. H. (2022). Al-Mutairi at Education Research International in. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6775052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406/ASSET/B6B6449D-88E1-4ABC-9916-EF26EB904492/ASSETS/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_160940690900800406-FIG1.JPG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Leijon, M., Gudmundsson, P., Staaf, P., & Christersson, C. (2022). Challenge based learning in higher education– A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Li, T., & Zhan, Z. (2022). A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lin, L., Shen, S., Shadiev, R., & Yu, M. (2025). Review of research on design thinking in K-12 education. Educational Research Review, 47, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2025.100682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, Y.-L. E., Lee, T.-P., & Huang, Y.-M. (2023). Enhancing university students’ creative confidence, learning motivation, and team creative performance in design thinking using a digital visual collaborative environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Olivares Garita, C., Brenes Sánchez, V., & Valverde Marín, E. (2019). R2D2: An effective model to incorporate ICTs in the EFL classroom? Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.15517/AIE.V20I1.40098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Oo, T. Z., Kadyirov, T., Kadyjrova, L., & Józsa, K. (2024). Design-based learning in higher education: Its effects on students’ motivation, creativity and design skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2024.101621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pan, R., Kuo, S. P., & Strobel, J. (2010). Novice students’ difficulties and remedies with the conceptualization phase of design. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--16358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Developtnent Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Design and Developtnent Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues, 1–180. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034/DESIGN-DEVELOPMENT-RESEARCH-RITA-RICHEY-JAMES-KLEIN/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rojas, D. G. R., Rangel, Y. N., & Mora, D. M. (2025). Implementing Design Thinking in STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Instruction, 18(4), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1847a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Romero Caballero, S., Canquiz Rincón, L., Rodríguez Toscano, A., Valencia Pérez, A., & Moreno Gómez, G. (2025). Challenge-based learning and design thinking in higher education: Institutional strategies for linking experiential learning, innovation, and academic performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2326191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Samaniego, M., Usca, N., Salguero, J., & Quevedo, W. (2024). Creative Thinking in Art and Design Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI14020192/S1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shé, C. N., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2022). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The #OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Thuan, N. H., & Antunes, P. (2024). A conceptual model for educating design thinking dispositions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(5), 1879–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-024-09881-X/FIGURES/3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wrigley, C., & Mosely, G. (2022). Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education. Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education, 1–223. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006176/DESIGN-THINKING-PEDAGOGY-CARA-WRIGLEY-GENEVIEVE-MOSELY/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Xiao, Y., & Jiang, C. (2022). Industrial designers’ thinking in the stage of concept generation for social design: themes, strategies and modes. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 33, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09732-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study