Knowledge, Attitude, Usage of Artificial Intelligence; and Adaptability among Graduate Student

This study examined the influence of knowledge, attitude, and usage of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ adaptability. It specifically assessed AI-related knowledge in homework assistance, student engagement, and assessment accuracy; students’ attitudes in terms of awareness, understanding, and familiarity; and AI usage across functionality, availability, and complexity. Predictive correlational research designs were employed with participants selected from a higher education institution. Data were gathered using validated and reliable survey instruments and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis to determine the significant relationships and predictors of adaptability. Results revealed moderate levels of AI knowledge, usage, and adaptability, alongside a high level of positive attitude toward AI. Significant positive relationships were found between adaptability and all AI dimensions, indicating that stronger engagement, familiarity, access, and effective utilization of AI tools are associated with better adaptability. Regression analysis identified familiarity, availability, complexity management, and student engagement as significant predictors of adaptability, while awareness alone did not necessarily translate into improved results without practical competence. The study concludes that meaningful interaction, guided usage, and hands-on experience with AI significantly enhance students’ adaptability. It is recommended that higher education institutions implement structured AI literacy programs, provide continuous training and institutional support, and integrate AI tools strategically into instruction to maximize their educational benefits.

knowledge, attitude, usage of artificial intelligence

1. Alamri, M., Aldhafeeri, F., & Almukadi, W. (2020). AI in education: Opportunities and challenges in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Emran, M., & Malik, S. I. (2020). The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Higher Education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Maroof, R. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students’ acceptance of Google Classroom: Anexploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(6), 112-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2020). A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories and models. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2085-2109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Developing students’ AI skills: Strategies and frameworks for higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1231-1247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bearman, M., Ajjawi, R., & Dawson, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Implications for teaching, learning, and assessment. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198–204.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brown, S. E., Johnson, T. D., & Allen, K. M. (2022). Longitudinal analysis of student attitudes towards AI in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 587-604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., & Joshi, R. (2018). Skill shift: Automation andthe future of the workforce. McKinsey Global Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence: Implications for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Personalized learning through AI: Enhancing adaptability in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 450-464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, Y., & Huang, R. (2019). Challenges and strategies for integrating AI into higher education: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 1067-1088. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of generative AI on education: Opportunities, challenges, and implications for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 26(4), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2021). The role of AI in supporting student learning: A systematic review of recent research. Computers & Education, 170, 104225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dillenbourg, P., Zufferey, G., & Jermann, P. (2020). Orchestrating AI-enhanced learning environments: What does it take? Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 58-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719-734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. García, E., Herrera, F., & Benítez, J. M. (2019). Understanding student attitudes toward AI and its impact on educational tool adoption. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 413-429. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I.-A., Wasson, B., & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2017). The influence of academic self‐efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hossain, M. S., Ahmadi, M., & Rahman, S. M. (2022). Barriers to positive attitudes towards AI in higher education. Computers & Education, 178, 104393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2020). What factors help and hinder the uptake of AI in schools? A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 1–18. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jöhnk, J., Rabhi, L., & Zarnekow, R. (2021). Student resistance to AI: Attitudinal factors influencing adoption in higher education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(1), 113-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Face-to-face with a virtual human: The design of AI-driven tutoring systems for higher education. Computers & Education, 126, 84-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., & Dowell, N. (2021). AI-driven analytics in higher education: Impacts on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(1), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Karimi, M., White, J., & Mirzaei, M. (2019). Barriers to AI adoption in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(1), 3-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kumar, R., Gupta, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Analyzing demographic factors affecting AI usage in higher education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 32(1), 27-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lim, C. P., Wang, T., & Graham, C. (2022). Digital transformation in education: Institutional readiness and technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 2401–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10123-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2017). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Examining attitudes towards AI across different academic disciplines. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 45-56.Miao, F., Holmes, W., & Huang, R. (2021). Integrating AI into the Curriculum: Approaches and Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 789-810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mustafa, K., Rahman, M., & Wang, S. (2021). The impact of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on AI tool usage among university students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 57-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nguyen, D. T., Sharma, P., & Wong, P. (2018). AI-driven learning tools: Their effectiveness and implications for student performance. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1441-1454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2021.100020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Raffaghelli, J. E. (2023). AI in education: Critical perspectives on student engagement and digital competence. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1181397. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc.2023.1181397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sampson, D. G., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. M., & Isaias, P. (2018). Digital technologies: Sustainable innovations for improving teaching and learning. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 77-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sharma, P., Choudhary, S., & Kaur, R. (2019). Exploring the factors influencing AI tool usage in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on trust in AI systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Southworth, J., Migliaccio, L., & Dawson, S. (2023). Developing AI literacy in higher education: Student perspectives and institutional responsibilities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Learning analytics and students’ academic performance: The role of self-regulated learning and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Teo, T. (2019). Students’ acceptance of educational technology: The role of self-efficacy and perceived usefulness. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 1–13.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Thomas, P., Akkaya, M., & Braun, S. (2020). AI usage in STEM versus non-STEM education: A comparative study. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K–12: What should every child know about AI? Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9795–9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2017). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., & Bälter, O. (2020). The impact of AI-based systems on student engagement in higher education: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 53-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Wang, Q., Lai, C., & Zhao, F. (2020). Determinants of AI tool usage among university students: A technology acceptance model approach. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2789-2805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Wang, Q., Wang, L., & Huang, S. (2018). Demographic factors and their influence on the adoption of AI technologies in education. Computers & Education, 126, 194-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Xing, W., & Du, D. (2019). The impact of AI on educational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 11(3), 24-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Yılmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2019). Attitudes towards AI and adaptability: A correlational study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 352-361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2020). Influence of familiarity on student attitudes towards AI in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zhong, R., Huang, Y., & Liu, S. (2021). AI in the humanities and social sciences: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1221-1237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Zhou, W., & Song, H. (2018). Analyzing the impact of academic year on AI tool usage among university students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 549-568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study