Mechanisms of Living Heritage Preservation: The Roles of Display and Experiential Design in Majiayao Painted Pottery

This study investigates the mechanisms through which living displays and experiential design drive audience engagement within the Majiayao painted pottery heritage in Lintao, Gansu. Drawing on the paradigm of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) inheritance, an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach was employed. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with ten key stakeholders were first conducted to identify contemporary safeguarding models. Subsequently, a structured questionnaire (N=351) was utilized to examine how interactive experiences influence inheritance effectiveness, measured by cognitive elevation, emotional identification, and communication intention. The results demonstrate that experiential displays foster substantive inheritance by facilitating the reconstruction of the audience’s internal mental models through deep psychological resonance. These findings offer a theoretical framework for the psychological mechanisms of heritage transmission and provide strategic pathways for the sustainable revitalization of prehistoric ceramic culture.

Majiayao Painted Pottery; Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH)

1. Alivizatou, M. 2012. Intangible Heritage and the Museum: New Perspectives on Cultural Preservation. Left Coast Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, J. G. 1925. Preliminary report on archaeological research in Kansu. Geological Survey of China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16.1, 74-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, B., et al. 2022. Scenes theory and cultural vitality in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs 44.3, 320-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Clark, T. N. 2014. The City as an Entertainment Machine. Emerald Group Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, J. 2021. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dammer, E. K. 2021. Technical knowledge and the Majiayao-style pottery found at sites in the Tao, Huangshui and Yellow River valleys. Archaeology International, 24.1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. 2000. Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. AltaMira Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Flad, R. K. 2023. Archaeological science and the study of early China. Journal of Anthropological Research 79.2, 145-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18.1, 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gadhoke, P., et al. 2019. Participatory action research and social justice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Giaccardi, E. 2012. Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Giaccardi, E., & Redström, J. 2020. Technology and intangible heritage: A design perspective. International Journal of Heritage Studies 26.10, 922-938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Giudici, E., et al. 2013. Sustainable development of heritage cities: The case of Cagliari. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11.4, 285-300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Graham, B., & Ashworth, G. J. 2000. A Geography of Heritage. Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hair, J. F., et al. 2022. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hein, G. E. 1998. Learning in the Museum. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. ICOMOS. 2022. Heritage and the Sustainable Development Goals: Policy Guidance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kidd, J., & Nieto McAvoy, E. 2020. Immersive experiences in museums, galleries and heritage sites: A review of research findings and issues. Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 2004. Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56.1-2, 52-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kreps, C. 2011. Changing the guard: Anthropology museums and cultural heritage. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17, 10-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Labadi, S. 2013. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value. AltaMira Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Li, M., et al. 2023. Interactive experience and cultural identity: A study of traditional crafts. Sustainability 15.4, 3122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liu, Z. 2021. The impact of augmented reality on museum visitor learning. Computers in Human Behavior 114, 106510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lowenthal, D. 2015. The Past is a Foreign Country - Revisited. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Luo, W., et al. 2025. Interregional interaction between the Majiayao culture and the Zongri culture on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: New evidence from the pottery production. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 65, 104522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. MDPI. 2023. Sustainable cultural innovation practice: Heritage education and creative inheritance of ICH. Sustainability 15.2, 1194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. MDPI. 2025. Immersive technologies in built heritage spaces: AR and VR applications at the Terracotta Warriors Museum. Sustainability 17.1, 3481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Meskell, L. 2020. Global Heritage: A Reader. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. 1999. The Experience Economy. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Podsakoff, P. M., et al. 2024. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 109.2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Poria, Y. 2022. The core of heritage tourism revisited: A consumer-oriented perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2020. Assessing mediation in non-experimental studies. Psychological Methods 25.3, 320-335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Shelach-Lavi, G. 2019. The Archaeology of Early China. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Silverman, H. 2015. Heritage and Community Engagement. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Staiff, R. 2014. Re-imagining Heritage Interpretation. Ashgate Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sterling, C. 2020. Designing ‘critical’ heritage experiences: Immersion, enchantment and autonomy. Archaeology International 22.1, 100-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Taylor, J., & Gibson, L. K. 2017. Digital heritage and the public. International Journal of Heritage Studies 23.5, 408-420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. 1990. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Underhill, A. P. 2020. A Companion to Chinese Archaeology. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. UNESCO. 2023. Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. UNESCO. 2025. Intangible cultural heritage safeguarding and climate action in Asia and the Pacific. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Waterton, E. 2021. Critical Heritage Studies. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wu, Z. 2024. The presentation and communication of ICH in the digital era: Strategies and challenges. Heritage Science 12.1, 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Xie, P. F. 2011. Authenticity and Heritage Tourism. Channel View Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zhao, S., et al. (2021). The Majiayao culture: New perspectives on the Chinese Neolithic. Antiquity 95.382, 1120-1135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study