Communication as a Strategic Pivot in Managing Higher Education Institutions in Uganda: A Scoping Review

Introduction: Communication is increasingly recognised as a crucial lever for organisational effectiveness and leadership in higher education institutions (HEIs). In Uganda, public and private universities face persistent challenges, including low organisational effectiveness, weak ICT capacity, governance problems, and stakeholder dissatisfaction, many of which are closely tied to communication practices. The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesise peer-reviewed evidence on how communication underpins the modern management of HEIs in Uganda, focusing on organisational effectiveness, leadership, ICT use, organisational culture, and stakeholder engagement. Methods: A scoping review with narrative synthesis was conducted, drawing on empirical and conceptual studies of Ugandan HEIs and selected international comparative works. Studies were screened for relevance to organisational communication, leadership styles, digital communication, organisational culture, and stakeholder engagement in higher education management. Results: The review identified four main domains: (1) communication and organisational effectiveness; (2) leadership styles and organisational communication; (3) digital communication and ICT-enabled management; and (4) communication, organisational culture, and stakeholder engagement. Conclusion: Across these domains, effective communication structures, flows, and climates are consistently associated with higher organisational effectiveness, enhanced educational quality, and improved staff and student experiences, while opaque or centralised communication is linked to governance crises and low commitment. Rapid ICT expansion has created new communication channels but is constrained by limited infrastructure and digital skills. Communication emerges as a vital managerial pivot in Ugandan HEIs, mediating the influence of leadership, technology, and organisational culture on institutional performance. Recommendations: The review recommends that HEIs adopt explicit institution-wide communication strategies, invest in robust digital systems and capacity-building, and embed participatory, dialogic communication in governance, decision-making, and quality-assurance processes. Future research should prioritise context-specific empirical studies, longitudinal analyses of communication reforms, and mixed-method comparative investigations across public and private universities to inform evidence-based communication policies and interventions.

Communication; Organisational effectiveness; Leadership styles; Higher Education Institutions; Digital communication.

1. Flores, A. (2025). The concept of interface is an analytical and practical approach to organisational communication in higher education institutions. Management (Montevideo), 15(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Frølich, N., Bleiklie, I., & Stensaker, B. (2025). Leadership communication during organisational transformation. European Journal of Higher Education, 15(5), 680–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2025.2456871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kasule, G. (2025). Adaptive leadership in public universities in Uganda: A systematic literature review. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.8.1.2684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kaznacheieva, T. (2025). Transformation of communication management in extracurricular school. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education (Series), 31(60), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.58442/3041-1831-2025-31(60)-78-91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lubaale, G. (2020). Information and communication technology in higher education in Uganda and education implications: A case of Kyambogo University. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(6), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v8i6.4842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Machidon, S. (2024). The use of modern communication technologies in the management of educational institutions. În Știință și educație: noi abordări și perspective: Materialele conferinței științifice internaționale. Vol. 2: Științe ale educației “In Science and Education: New Approaches and Perspectives. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Vol. 2: Educational Sciences.” (pp. 58–67). https://doi.org/10.46727/c.v2.21-22-03-2024.p58-67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mahbubi, M., Cholili, A., Huda, A., & S., [initial missing]. (2025). Enhancing educational quality through effective communication in private universities. Journal of Education and Learning Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.56404/jels.v5i1.124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mgweba, C., Rawjee, V., & Naidoo, P. (2025). Enhancing communication effectiveness in higher education institutions: Lessons from Walter Sisulu University. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i4.7820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mikando, M., Charles, M., John, K., Mugabo, A., Lawrence, S., Agnes, N., Bosco, L., Vincent, S., Judith, N., Kabasiita, J., Kizza, S., Muhamadi, K., Christopher, I., & Mugagga, A. (2025). Influence of participatory leadership on the quality of education in higher education institutions in Uganda: A case study of Kabale University. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.2.3152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mwesigwa, R., Tusiime, I., & Ssekiziyivu, B. (2020). Leadership styles, job satisfaction and organisational commitment among academic staff in public universities. Journal of Management Development, 39(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2018-0055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Obid, P. (2024). Advantages of modern communication in the leadership activities of senior management in higher education institutions. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 4(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-04-10-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Syakur, A., Susilo, T., Wike, W., & Ahmadi, R. (2020). Sustainability of communication, organisational culture, cooperation, trust and leadership style for lecturer commitments in higher education. [Journal title], 3(2), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Takhtarova, K. (2022). Communications management in the corporate culture system of higher education institutions. Vìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Ekonomìka, “Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Economics Series.” 12(24), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-2822-2022-12-24-68-75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Turyahikayo, W., & Mugizi, W. (2025). Communication and organisational effectiveness in selected public universities in Uganda. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 2(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v2i3.77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Turyahikayo, W., Mugizi, W., & Kasule, G. (2023). Leadership styles and organisational effectiveness in selected public universities in Uganda. The Uganda Higher Education Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.58653/nche.v11i1.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Turyahikayo, W., Mugizi, W., & Kasule, G. (2024). Leadership styles and organisational communication in selected public universities in Uganda. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38140/ijms-2024.vol1.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Uzorka, A., & Kalabuki, K. (2024). The transformative impact of technological advancements in educational leadership on student experiences and outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 20883–20904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12714-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., Reid, A., & Kidman, G. (2022). Scoping reviews: Their development and application in environmental and sustainability education research. Environmental Education Research, 28, 645 - 673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2047896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hayman, R., & Smith, E. (2023). Social media in undergraduate teaching and learning: A scoping review protocol. PLOS ONE, 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Soares, C., & Parker, D. (2016). An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 13 2, 118-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C., Peters, M., & Tricco, A. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis.. JBI evidence synthesis. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Peters, M., Marnie, C., Tricco, A., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18, 2119 - 2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-20-00167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Khalil, H., Larsen, P., Marnie, C., Pollock, D., Tricco, A., & Munn, Z. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20, 953 - 968. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Peters, M., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K., Tunçalp, Ӧ., Wilson, M., Zarin, W., & Tricco, A. (2021). Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Systematic Reviews, 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pham, M., Rajič, A., Greig, J., Sargeant, J., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 371 - 385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pollock, D., Peters, M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Alexander, L., Tricco, A., Evans, C., De Moraes, É., Godfrey, C., Pieper, D., Saran, A., Stern, C., & Munn, Z. (2022). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.. JBI evidence synthesis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pollock, D., Davies, E., Peters, M., Tricco, A., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C., Khalil, H., & Munn, Z. (2021). Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77, 2102 - 2113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H., & Straus, S. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., Godfrey, C., Macdonald, M., Langlois, E., Soares-Weiser, K., Moriarty, J., Clifford, T., Tunalp, Z., & Straus, S. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study