The Pedagogical Strategies of Filipino EFL Tutors for Non-Filipino Learners: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

This study investigates the experiences and pedagogical practices of Filipino English as a Foreign Language (EFL) tutors in one-to-one synchronous online instruction, an increasingly important mode of global language education. As online tutoring continues to expand, tutors must respond to diverse learners while teaching through digitally mediated environments. However, limited research has examined how Filipino EFL tutors experience their teaching practices in culturally diverse one-to-one online contexts. The study aimed to explore how tutors adapt their instructional strategies, respond to classroom demands, and interpret their professional roles in synchronous online teaching. The study used a qualitative research design guided by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Data were collected through in-depth interviews with seven Filipino EFL tutors who had at least two years of online teaching experience. The analysis focused on understanding how tutors make sense of their lived experiences while teaching learners from different linguistic and cultural backgrounds in virtual settings. The findings show that tutors experience one-to-one online teaching as requiring continuous adjustment to learners’ participation, proficiency, pace, and emotional state. Tutors actively sustain engagement by using multimodal strategies, digital tools, and interactive techniques suited to the online environment. They also build connection with learners to support confidence and participation. Tutors recognize that their instructional decisions are shaped by institutional conditions such as structured lessons, time limits, and platform expectations. Over time, tutors develop greater confidence and adaptability through repeated exposure to diverse teaching situations. They also become more aware of cultural differences that influence communication and interaction. Overall, the study suggests that effective online EFL teaching involves adaptive expertise, relational attentiveness, emotional regulation, and intercultural awareness. These findings provide insights for teacher training, professional support, and future research on one-to-one online language instruction, particularly for enhancing the quality of online EFL teaching and informing professional development.

pedagogical strategies, one-to-one synchronous online instruction, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, EFL tutors, Philippines

1. Åkerfeldt, A., Bergdahl, N., & Hrastinski, S. (2023). Adult learners’ perceptions of distance education. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 30(1), 248–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714231200422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bagea, I. (2023). Cultural influences in Language learning in a global context. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(2), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v4i2.248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Borup, J., Graham, C.R., West, R.E. et al. Academic Communities of Engagement: an expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 807–832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson English. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA6611201X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cukurova, M., Khan-Galaria, M., Millán, E., & Luckin, R. (2022). A learning analytics approach to monitoring the quality of online one-to-one tutoring. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dela Cruz, J. A. D., Paican, J. S., Rajahmuda, N. R., & Caballo, J. H. S. (2024). Intercultural communicative competence in teaching English as a foreign language: Perspectives of Filipino teachers. American Journal of Society and Law, 3(2), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v3i2.3352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gallo, P. R., & Raymundo, J. L. (2024). Communicative language teaching and assessment strategies in online English as foreign language tutoring context. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(7), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.7.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice, Third Edition. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Grand View Research. (2024). Online tutoring services market size, share & trends analysis report, 2024–2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gortazar, L., Hupkau, C., & Roldán-Monés, A. (2024). Online tutoring works: Experimental evidence from a program with vulnerable children. Journal of Public Economics, 232, 105082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hasan, M. F. (2025). Educational authority and regulatory legitimacy: comparing normative systems in pesantren and public schools in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 57(2-3), 182-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hasper, A., & Barkhuizen, G. (2023). CELTA tutors’ beliefs about online tutoring practices. ELT Journal, 77(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ho, C., & Allieu, N. (2024, July), In-Classroom Dynamics and Pacing Strategies to Improve Student Learning: Lesson Learned from a 100- Level Course Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska. 10.18260/1-2-111.1110-46388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hrastinski, S., Paul, E., & Åkerfeldt, A. (2024). Temporal-spatial and pedagogical flexibility in distance education. Distance Education, 46(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2380370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jeong, K.-O. (2023). Integrating technology into language teaching practice in the post-COVID-19 digital age: From a Korean EFL context. RELC Journal, 54(2), 394–409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231186431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Social presence and online discussions: a mixed method investigation. Distance Education, 41(4), 490–514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mercer, S., & Gregersen, T. (2020). Teacher wellbeing. ISBN: 9-78-019440560-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2021). Thriving or surviving Emergency remote teaching necessitated by COVID-19: University teachers’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00567-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Munaji, M., Rohaeti, T., Mutadi, M., Sumliyah, S., & Kodirun, K. (2024). A literature review of flexibility in interactive mathematics classrooms: the role of teachers and students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Muntaha, M., Chen, J., & Dobinson, T. (2024). Multimodal interactive alignment: Language learners’ interaction in CMC tasks through Instagram. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Naderifar M., Goli H., Ghaljaie F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schirmer, B., & Lockman, A. (2022). Culturally Responsive teaching in an undergraduate online General Education course. Online Learning, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shirley, I. (2025). Exploring the Use of Adaptive Teaching Methods to Improve Class Engagement with a Year 9 Latin Class in Chapter 13 of Suburani. Journal of Classics Teaching, 26, 167 - 176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2010). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2010.1.10.44 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sun, Y., Shi, W., & Fu, L. (2023). Improving Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in online classes: The role of teacher scaffolding and teacher respect. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2180009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2018). Leading by learning: exploring the professional learning networks of instructional leaders. Educational Media International, 55(2), 137–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should Teachers be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.70725/307718pkpjuu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Van Manen, M. (2017). But is it phenomenology?. Qualitative health research, 27(6), 775-779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wang, H., Burić, I., Chang, M.-L., & Gross, J. J. (2023). Teachers’ emotion regulation and related environmental, personal, instructional, and well-being factors: A meta-analysis. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 26(6), 1651–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09810-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Xie, K., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Cheng, S.-L., & Jiang, Z. (2022). Examining high-school students' motivation change through a person-centered approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., & Yu, M. (2024). Exploring emotional support and engagement in adolescent EFL learning: The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study