Unveiling the Moral Reasoning of Junior High School Students

This descriptive qualitative study examined the moral reasoning of public junior high school students in the Division of Digos City, Davao Region. Its purpose was to explore how students approach ethical dilemmas and perceive their role in moral decision-making, identifying key influences such as peers, family, school, and digital exposure on their moral development. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using a semi-structured interview guide. Four essential themes were extracted as regards the influences on moral reasoning: Family as the Primary Moral Architect, School as the Reinforcing Structure, Faith as a Spiritual Compass, and Peers as a Double-Edged Sword. Added on the role of moral reasoning in shaping decision making in day-to-day interactions, three essential themes emerged: Prosocial Application, Moral Resilience, and Navigating Moral Dilemmas. Three essential themes emerged as regards the insights of public junior high school students on moral reasoning: Moral Learning Through Experience, Internalizing Moral Judgment, and Moral Strength Emerging from Adversity. The findings further showed that moral understanding deepens through personal experience and consequence, evolving from external rules to an internalized compass. The results provide valuable insights for designing more effective, context-sensitive values education programs that bridge theoretical instruction with the real-world ethical challenges faced by adolescents.

Values education, moral reasoning, public junior high school students, descriptive qualitative, Philippines

1. Afable, F. P. (2024). Perceptions of Carmona National High School Students in the Teaching of Values Education: A Phenomenological Study. Available at SSRN 4890833. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmeti, K., & Ramadani, N. (2021). Determination of Kohlberg’s moral development stages and chronological age. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 8(15-16), 37-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amik, A. M. R., Concepcion, H. S. C., Villamor, H. J. A., & Cleofas, J. V. (2025). Digital Affordances and the Self: A Mixed Methods Study on the Resources for Online Mental Health Advocacy Engagement Among Filipino Senior High School Students. Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Banda, J. H. (2025). A Critical analysis of Pedagogical Strategies for Fostering Ethical Decision-Making, Integrity, and Social Responsibility in Generation Z: Addressing the Impact of Modern Societal Challenges on Moral Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bang, T. C. (2024). Ensuring credibility and trustworthiness in qualitative inquiries. In applied linguistics and language education research methods: Fundamentals and innovations (pp. 70-85). IGI Global.- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beyers, W., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2025). Autonomy in adolescence: a conceptual, developmental and cross-cultural perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 121-141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Buckley, J., Adams, L., Aribilola, I., Arshad, I., Azeem, M., Bracken, L., ... & Zhang, L. (2022). An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview-based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 1963-1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carlo, G., Torres, M., Partovi, R., & Cruz, A. (2024). Moral development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, Q., Su, X., Liu, S., Miao, K., & Fang, H. (2021). The relationship between moral sensitivity and professional values and ethical decision-making in nursing students. Nurse education today, 105, 105056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chuang, S. (2021). The applications of constructivist learning theory and social learning theory on adult continuous development. Performance Improvement, 60(3), 6-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cumilang, G. F. B., Derilo, R. C., Umlano, M. C., Pusawen, N. A., Evangelista, A. A., Discaya, F. I., & Tallungan, J. R. R. (2025). Improving Student Performance in Secondary School Chemistry through Strategic Intervention Materials Integrating Real-World Scenarios. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dela Cruz, J., Abre, K. D., & Caloc, L. J. (2024). Navigating the Moral Values of Senior High School Students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(2), 108-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dörfler, V., & Stierand, M. (2021). Bracketing: A phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity. Journal of organizational change management, 34(4), 778-793. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Drisko, J. W. (2025). Transferability and generalization in qualitative research. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(1), 102-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Firmansyah, D., & Saepuloh, D. (2022). Social learning theory: Cognitive and behavioral approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(3), 297-324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Forbes, M. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., Hall, J. A., Walker, N. A., & Booker, J. M. (2022). How to conduct a focus group interview: Tips, strategies, and examples for novice researchers. Education for Information, 38(2), 171-187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Harari, Y., & Weinstock, M. (2021). Interpretive theory of mind and empathic prosocial moral reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 78-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ieracitano, F., Balenzano, C., Girardi, S., Gemmano, C. G., & Comunello, F. (2024). Online hate speech as a moral issue: Exploring moral reasoning of young italian users on social network sites. Social Science Computer Review, 42(1), 25-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khadka, C. (2024). Social Learning Theory and the Development of Aggression. Medha: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 79-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Khairani, A., & Aulia, N. (2025). A Review of the Influence of Value and Ethical Literacy on the Formation of Students ‘moral Character in Indonesian Schools. Socio Sphere: Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 23-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Killen, M., & Dahl, A. (2021). Moral reasoning enables developmental and societal change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1209-1225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Koutroubas, V., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Bandura’s social learning theory and its importance in the organizational psychology context. Psychology, 12(6), 315-322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kumar, S., & Jurgens, D. (2025). Are Rules Meant to be Broken? Understanding Multilingual Moral Reasoning as a Computational Pipeline with UniMoral. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14083. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Le, H. V., Nguyen, T. A. D., Le, D. H. N., Nguyen, P. U., & Nguyen, T. T. A. (2024). Unveiling critical reading strategies and challenges: a mixed-methods study among English major students in a Vietnamese higher education institution. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2326732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, H., Lee, H., & Ko, Y. (2024). Review and Beyond. A Moral Inquiry Into Epistemic Insights in Science Education: Personal and Global Perspectives of Socioscientific Issues, 61, 287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Li, S., Hong, Y. C., & Craig, S. D. (2023). A systematic literature review of Social Learning Theory in Online Learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lim, R. P. S. (2024). Filipino values of secondary school heads on school-based management: Basis for values enhancement program. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 9(1), 115-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lind, G. (2023). The theory of moral-cognitive development: A socio-psychological assessment. In Moral development and the social environment (pp. 21-53). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Malti, T., Galarneau, E., & Peplak, J. (2021). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 1097-1113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mathes, E. W. (2021). An evolutionary perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Current Psychology, 40(8), 3908-3921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mathes, E. W. (2021). An evolutionary perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Current Psychology, 40(8), 3908-3921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Meyer, K. (2024). Moral education through the fostering of reasoning skills. Ethical theory and moral practice, 27(1), 41-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mokhtari, L. B., Tavan, A., Sanjari, S., Soliemani, M. R. M., & Salajegheh, A. (2025). The Impact of Peer Relationships, Moral Development, and Family Relationships on Collective Violence with the Mediating Role of Psychological Security. Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies, 12(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Moody-Adams, M. (2025). Revisiting Kohlberg’s account of moral maturity and moral development: The 2024 Kohlberg Memorial Lecture. Journal of Moral Education, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Moore, I. (2022). The effect of student voice on the perception of student agency. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Muchlis, A. K., Turmudi, I., & Puspitarini, D. (2025). Implementation of Active Learning Method in Improving Understanding of Moral Material on Students At School. Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(01), 237-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nainggolan, M. M., & Naibaho, L. (2022). The integration of Kohlberg moral development theory with education character. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 31, 203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ochoa, D. P., & Dela Cruz, T. (2024). Negotiating autonomy, community, and divinity in urban Filipino young adults’ moral reasoning. Culture & Psychology, 1354067X241285350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ott, D. L. (2024). Social learning theory. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Management (pp. 133-134). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Rehren, P., & Sauer, H. (2024). Another brick in the wall? moral education, social learning, and moral progress. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 27(1), 25-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sham, F. M., Yaqin, A. I. N. U. L., & Wachidah, H. N. (2021). Moral Reasoning Theory: Between Kohlberg's and al-Ghazali's Perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 20, 25-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Soltani, M., Etemadifar, S., & Kheiri, S. (2022). The effect of a Kohlberg’s theory of moral development-based intervention on ethical reasoning in nurse interns at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Multidisciplinary Care, 11(2), 47-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Subrahmanyam, S. (2025). Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in the Aviation Industry. In Qualitative Research Methods in Air Transport Management (pp. 123-152). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tang, J., Xiang, X., Wang, J., & Schänzel, H. (2024). Mechanism Underlying the Influence of Family Travel on Adolescent Self‐Differentiation: A Social Learning Theory Perspective. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(5), e2766. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2021). Is replication relevant for qualitative research?. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Verma, A., Singh, K., & Gupta, M. (2025). Ethical Dilemmas in the Classroom: A Narrative Approach to Professional Ethics in Indian Teacher Education. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 3(3), 274-284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Walker, J. A., & Brown, C. E. (2023). Contextualizing the Findings: A Meta-Analysis of Qualitative Research in Education. Qualitative Research Review Letter, 1(02), 64-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Weber, J., & Siniora, D. N. (2021). Investigating cognitive moral reasoning: The effect of dilemma context and gender agreement between the subject and the dilemma actor. Business and Society Review, 126(4), 455-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. White, E., & Davis, M. (2023). Exploring subjectivity: A critique of reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Review Letter, 1(02), 96-103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research?. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yang, S., Zhang, H., Zhu, X., & Li, W. (2025). Associations between teacher and student relationship and moral sensitivity among Chinese adolescents in the digital age: the chain mediation effect of perceived social support and moral identity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zhao, G., Bai, Z., Yin, Y., Yue, W., Zhang, T., Shi, R., & Guo, C. The Impact of Children's Time Investment in Physical Activity on the Development of Prosocial Moral Reasoning, , A Study Under the School Consolidation Policy in Rural North China. Available at SSRN 5127284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, C. (2024). Unveiling students' experiences and perceptions of Artificial Intelligence usage in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6), 126-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Zhou, Y., Liu, W., Lee, C., Xu, B., & Sun, I. (2024). Traditional social learning predicts cyber deviance? Exploring the offending versatility thesis in social learning theory. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 42(4), 417-434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study