Leadership Succession and Organizational Performance: A Strategic Planning Approach to Educational Management

Leadership succession is increasingly important in educational institutions because it shapes continuity, sta-bility, and strategic alignment. This study examined the status of leadership succession and its contribution to organizational performance in selected tertiary institutions in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Mus-lim Mindanao (BARMM), using strategic planning as an institutional lens. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, combining survey responses from 140 participants and qualitative insights from 10 key informants. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank-order correlation, thematic analysis, and triangulation. The findings showed that leadership succession was evident in the par-ticipating institutions, although its formalization and regularity varied. Succession planning contributed ex-tensively to organizational performance by strengthening leadership continuity, organizational stability, and strategic alignment. The study further found a strong and statistically significant positive relationship be-tween the status of leadership succession and organizational performance. At the same time, implementation remained challenging because of limited successor readiness, turnover pressures, resource constraints, and resistance to change. The study proposes the Adaptive Participatory Leadership Succession Framework for Schools, anchored on Policy, Pipeline, Participation, and Review. Overall, the findings affirm that succession planning is not merely a replacement mechanism but a strategic, evidence-based institutional function that can improve continuity, resilience, and long-term performance. The study underscores the need for educa-tional institutions to adopt more systematic, inclusive, and development-oriented approaches to leadership succession.

leadership succession, organizational performance

1. Abubakar, N., & Ismael, R. (2024). Leadership styles of middle managers of higher education institu-tions in Basilan, Philippines. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(8), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, A. R., & Ming, T. Z. (2020). Effective strategy for succession planning in higher education institutions. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 203–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Abbas, S. (2021). A systematic review of succession planning in higher education. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(12), 45–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Shammari, H. A., & Hussein, R. A. (2023). Strategic planning and organizational performance: An empirical study. Sustainability, 15(15), 6690. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arrieta, G. S., Barrameda, C. N., & Sudarsana, I. K. (2022). A succession planning model for academ-ic heads in private sectarian schools in the Philippines. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 8(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bangsamoro Transition Authority Parliament. (2021). Bangsamoro Education Code of 2021 (Bang-samoro Autonomous Act No. 18). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2023). The impact of organizational culture on leadership succession plan-ning in schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, 45(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bush, T. (2018). Leadership and management development in education. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Calinao-De Guzman, T. M. (2024). Management’s perception of succession planning towards crafting a succession plan: The case of a higher education institution in Batangas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Camatog, D. C., & Sario, J. A. (2023). Building leaders for tomorrow: A comprehensive succession planning model for higher education institutions. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 5(3), 56–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dahlan, D. A. (2024). Who is the next leader? Understanding women leadership development and succession planning in Saudi Arabian higher educational institutions. Frontiers in Sociology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dennison, K. (2024, June 25). The importance of succession planning, now more than ever. Forbes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fuller, E. J., Hollingworth, L., & Young, M. D. (2021). Leadership succession and its impact on school performance: The need for strategic planning. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 312–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Guiamalon, T. S. (2022). Administrative competence of school heads of the Ministry of Basic, High-erand Technical Education (MBHTE), BARMM. Globus: An International Journal of Management & IT, 13(2), 57–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning in times of change: A review of the literature. School Leadership & Management, 30(5), 491–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hechanova, M. R., Villaluz, V. C., & Reyes, A. R. (2019). The influence of organizational culture on leadership succession planning in higher education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Klein, M., Smith, J., & Taylor, L. (2021). Effective leadership succession in educational settings: Strategies for success. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press. Lampaco, A. T., Naga, M.-S. M., Guimba, W. D., & Daguisonan, L. B. (2024). A qualitative study on MBHTE-BARMM supervi-sors’ approaches to achieving work-life responsibilities. Education Quarterly Reviews, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mastura, C. O. (2025). School improvement plan implementation in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region (BARMM): A predictive-correlational approach. Psychology and Education, 33(7), 804–815. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ministry of Basic, Higher and Technical Education. (2024, May 3). BARMM records 17% increase in enrollment for SY 2023–2024. Bangsamoro Government News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. O’Connor, E. J. (2021). Leadership succession planning in higher education: A systematic review. Ed-ucational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 671–689. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Panganiban, J., & Reyes, L. (2024). Resilient leadership among school heads in Mindanao: A multiple case study. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 45(2), 18–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Psico-Smart. (2024). What role does technology play in modern succession planning initiatives? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rothwell, W. J. (2020). Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building tal ent from within (6th ed.). AMACOM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Santora, J. C., Clemens, R., & Sarros, J. C. (2011). Maintaining the delicate balance: Leadership suc-cession and the organization’s well-being. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 12–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Siambi, J. (2022). The impact of leadership succession planning on organizational performance. Inter-national Journal of Management Studies and Research, 10(3), 12–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Taylor, L., Johnson, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Barriers to effective succession planning in education: In-sights from current leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Villamor, M. R., Pecson, G., Arcilla, L., Bacus, J., Abando, A., Bigcas, B., & Quinco-Cadosales, M. N. (2022). A meta-synthesis on school leadership succession: Groundwork for effective transition. Multicultural Education, 8(5), 61–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Watson, T. (2020). Leveraging technology for effective succession planning in academia. Computers in Human Behavior. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Williams, K., Garcia, L., & Thompson, J. (2023). Leveraging technology for leadership succession planning in education. Innovations in Educational Leadership, 40(6), 150–165). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya