Social Constructivism and the Zone of Proximal Development in Reading Comprehension Strategies

This paper explores the intersection of social constructivist theory and reading comprehension strategies, with a particular focus on Lev Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Social constructivism posits that learning is inherently social and contextual, emphasising the role of interaction, culture, and collaboration in the construction of knowledge. Within this framework, reading comprehension is not merely a cognitive skill but a socially mediated process that evolves through guided participation and scaffolded learning. The article examines how reading strategies align with the principles of ZPD, enabling learners to move beyond their current capabilities. The paper concludes by advocating for instructional practices that balance independence with guided support, ensuring that reading comprehension remains a dynamic, socially enriched experience.

Social constructivism, proximal development

1. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., Kim, J., Crassas, M.E. and Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What Else Matters Besides Strategies and Skills? The Reading Teacher, 66 (6), 440 – 448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajudua, R. (2011). Impact of Sentence Combining and Activity-Based Instruction on Primary School Pupils’ Performance in Reading. Journal of Primary Education, 9 (1), 58 – 67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajudua, R. (2011). Impact of Sentence Combining and Activity-Based Instruction on Primary School Pupils’ Performance in Reading. Journal of Primary Education, 9 (1), 58 – 67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akinmusire, P.O. (2014). Literature Circle and Story Mapping as determiners of Pre-service Teachers’ Performance in Reading Comprehension, Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bigge, M.L. & Sherims, S.S. (2004). Learning Theories for Teachers. (Boston: Pearson Education Inc). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blade, S.K (2013) Reading comprehension: Strategies or skills. Journal of English Studies, 3 (1), 97-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second Language Reading Strategies Research at the Secondary and University Levels: Variations, Disparities and Generalisability. The Reading Matrix, 2 (3), 1 – 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bush, W. & Williams, S.K (2013). Semantic Mapping in the Classroom: The Roles of Teachers’ Characteristics. Journal of Language in Teaching, 17 (1), 102 – 117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carreker, S. (2004). Developing Metacognitive Skills: Vocabulary and Comprehension (Bellaire, TX: Neuhaus Education Center). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Castek, J. (2013) Supporting online Reading Comprehension through Internet Reciprocal Teaching. Carlifornia Reader, 47, (11), 38-43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cunningham, P.M., Cunningham, J.W., Moore, S.A. and Moore, D.W. (2004). Reading and Writing in Elementary Classroom: Research-based K4 Instruction (5thedn) (Boston: Pearson Education Inc). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Duffy, G.G. (2003). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills and strategies, (New York: Guilford). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Erickson, H. (2012) Concept-Based Teaching and Learning I.B Position Paper (International Baccaloureate Organisation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fielding, L.G. & Pearson, P.D. (1994). Reading Comprehension: What Works. Educational Leadership, 51 (5), 62 – 66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Garcia, G.E., Pearson, P.D., Taylor, B.M., Bauer, E.B. and Stahl, K.A.D. (2011). Socio-Constructivist and Political View on Teachers’ Implementation of Two Types of Reading Comprehension Approaches in Low-Income Schools. Theory into Practice, 50, 149-156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension (Norwood, NJ: Ablex). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Goodluck J.E. & Archibong, S. (2017) Activity based instructional strategies as the Determinants of Secondary School Students’ achievement in English language. Journal of Language Education, 9 (1), 38-47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Guo, H. (2018) Application of a Computer-Assisted Instruction System Based on Constructivism, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(4) 33-44 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. International Reading Association (2000). Excellent Reading Teachers: A position statement of the International Reading Association. (Newark, DE: IRA). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Iyabode, S.T (2013). Teaching in Difficult Areas: The Role of Reading Comprehension. Journal of Adult Literacy, 3 (1), 89 – 111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Izadi, M. & Nowrouzi, H. (2016) Reciprocal Teaching and Emotional Intelligence: A case study of Iranian EFL Learners’ reading comprehension, Reading Matric: An International Online Journal, 16 (1), 135-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jitendra, A.K., Dupuis, D.N, Rodriguez, M.C; Zaslofsky A.F., Slater, S. Cozine-Corroy, K. & Church, C. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of schema-based instruction on mathematical outcomes for third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 252-276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kong, A. & Pearson, P.D. (2003). The Road to Participation: The Construction of Literacy Practice in a Learning Community of Linguistically Diverse Students. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 85 – 119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Marginson, S. & Dong, T.K.A (2017). Vygotsky’s Sociocultural theory in the context of globalization, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(1), 116-129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Murphy, C. Scantlebury, K. & Milne, C. (2015). Using Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceptualizing co-teaching in pre-service science teacher education, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 281-295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence – Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction, (Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ness, M.K. (2016). Reading Comprehension Strategies in Secondary Content Area Classrooms: Teacher Use and Attitudes towards Reading Comprehension Instruction, Reading Horizons, 59 (78-85) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ojikutu, K. (2011). Learning Instruction in Elementary Class. The Reading Circle, 3 (1), 61 – 74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Okkinga, M., Vansteensel, R; VanGelderen, A.J.S and Sleegers, P.J.C. (2018) Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on reading comprehension of low-achieving adolescents: The Importance of specific teachers Skills, Journal of Research in reading, 41(1), 20-41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Olson, C.B. and Land, R. (2007). A Cognitive Strategy Approach to Reading and Writing Instruction for English Language Learners in Secondary School. Research in the Teaching of English, 41 (93), 269 – 303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Omokaro, B.A. (2015) Reciprocal Teaching and Literature Circle: “We can Do It Tool” in Adult Literacy Class. Journal of Adult and Informal Education, 13 (2), 73-88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Park, Y. (2010). A Relationship between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategy Use: Meta-Analysis, English Teaching, 65 (3), 3-22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pearson, P.D. (2009) The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. Isreal and G. Duffy (Eds), Handbook of research on reading comprehension, (New York: Routledge). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Peltier, C. & Vannest, K.J. (2018) The effect of schema-based instruction on Mathematical Problem Solving on Students with emotional and Behavioural Disorders, Behavioural Disorders, 43 (2), 277-289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Petrova, Z. (2013). On the Relevance of using Vygotsky’s Theoretical Framework to Legitimise Dialogic Teaching/Learning, Journal of Pedagogy, 4 (2), 237-252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pressley, M and El-Dinary, P.B (1997). What we know about translating comprehension strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of learning disabilities, 30, 486-488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sheorey, R. and Mokhtari K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers, System, 29, 431-449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Thorne, J.A. (2013). Biblical Online education: Contributions from Constructivism, Christian Education Journal, 10 (1), 99-109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tikodo, T. (2012). The Effect of Reading Instructional Strategies of Primary School Students in Reading Comprehension. Review in Social Sciences and Humanities, 3 (1), 101 – 117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Truelove, E. (2014) How can I enhance a reciprocal teaching intervention to support the reading comprehension skills of two children with ASC2 An action study. University of Sheffield. Retrieved December 2017 at http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6786/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2010). Activity Systems analysis methods: Understanding Complex Learning Environments, (The Netherlands: Spring) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Yang, X. (2016). Study on Factors Affecting Learning Strategies on Reading Comprehension, Journal of Language Teaching and Resea, 7(3), 586-590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study