Gamifying Motivation Theories: Developing a Crossword Puzzle for Management Education

Authors

Nurul Lizzan Kamarudin

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sarawak, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0069

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 660-663

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-23

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published: 2025-10-31

Abstract

Motivation theories are an important part of management and human resource education, but many students find them difficult to understand and remember when taught through traditional methods. This concept paper introduces the Motivation Theories Crossword Puzzle as a creative gamified learning tool to make these abstract ideas more engaging and easier to learn. The crossword includes key concepts from Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, McClelland’s Theory of Needs, and Vroom’s Expectancy Theory. Built on the principles of active learning and gamification, the puzzle encourages student participation, problem-solving, and teamwork. This paper explains the design, educational purpose, and possible classroom applications of the tool. It shows how gamified activities like crosswords can help connect theory with practice, while also improving comprehension and retention. The proposed approach offers educators a practical strategy to make learning motivation theories more interactive and effective.

Keywords

gamification, motivation theories, crossword puzzle

Downloads

References

1. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Motivation and engagement in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(2), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed, and what remains uncertain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gee, J. P. (2012). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? —A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles