Legitimacy and Implementation Challenges of the Katarungang Pambarangay: Basis for Strengthening the Functions of the Lupong Tagapamayapa in Borongan City

This study explored the effectiveness of the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP) process and the challenges encountered based on the perceptions of the Lupong Tagapamayapa in Borongan City. As mandated by Republic Act No. 7160, Katarungang Pambarangay is an approach to resolving disputes in a friendly manner in order to reduce the burden of the judicial courts and promote social harmony in the community. A qualitative case study research design guided the research in gathering data through the use of semi-structured interviews with key informants such as the Punong Barangay, Barangay Secretary, and Lupon member. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the gathered information. Results showed that while Lupon members are familiar with KP procedures, they are not completely knowledgeable about the process due to insufficient training opportunities. Katarungang Pambarangay helps avoid unnecessary litigation expenses, speeds up the process, and bring peace in the community. Nevertheless, the difficulty in resolving emotionally charged cases, the lack of motivation and inadequate training are significant constraints for the process.

barangay justice system, dispute resolution

1. Agra, A. C. (2000). Local autonomy and administration of justice: Framework for integration. Ateneo School of Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aquino, R. S. (2003). Five municipal case studies on the Philippine barangay mediation system. Mediators Network for Sustainable Peace, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Goldsmith, A. A. (2005). Institutional dualism and international development: A revisionist interpretation of good governance. Administration & Society, 37(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704272595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cappelletti, M., & Garth, B. (1978). Access to justice: The worldwide movement to make rights effective. Giuffrè. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Calderon, J. F., & Gonzales, E. G. (1993). Methods of research and thesis writing. National Bookstore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2009). National summary report on Katarungang Pambarangay. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Golub, S. (2003). Beyond rule of law orthodoxy: The legal empowerment alternative. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grady, M. P. (1998). Qualitative and action research: A practitioner handbook. Phi Delta Kappa International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hycner, R. H. (1995). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Manuel, M., & Vigo, M. (2004). Katarungang Pambarangay: A handbook. Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN) & Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Martinez, A. M. (2002). Mediation in courts in the barangay justice system. Philippine Judicial Journal, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maru, V. (2006). Between law and society: Paralegals and the provision of justice services in Sierra Leone and worldwide. Yale Journal of International Law, 31(2), 427–476. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sander, F. E. A., & Goldberg, S. B. (1994). Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure. Negotiation Journal, 10(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1994.tb00014.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tabucanon, G. M. P., Wall, J. A., & Yan, W. (2008). Philippines community mediation: Katarungang Pambarangay. Journal of Dispute Resolution. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2008/iss2/5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wojkowska, E. (2006). Doing justice: How informal justice systems can contribute. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar