Social Factors as Predictors of Premarital Sex among Secondary School Adolescents in South-East States Nigeria

The study investigated Social Factors as Predictor of Premarital sex among Secondary School Adolescents in South-East in Nigeria. One research question guided the study and one hypothesis were formulated and tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study employed a correlational survey design as the study sought to investigate relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The population of the study comprised 78,740 senior secondary school (SS II) students in the 1,230 public secondary schools in South East States of Nigeria. The sample for the study was two thousand four hundred and forty-one (2,441) students selected using stratified random sampling techniques. A researcher developed questionnaire titled “Social Factors Questionnaire (SFQ) and premarital sex Questionnaire (PSQ) was used for the study and was validated by three lecturers from the Department of Psychological Foundations Facility of Education, Abia State University, Uturu. The instrument yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.91 which implied that the instrument was reliable for the study. Research question was answered using simple linear regression, while t-test statistics associated with regression analysis was used to test hypotheses at 0,05 level of significance. The findings from the study reveal among others that family structure predicts premarital sex to a high extent among secondary school adolescent. Again, the corresponding hypotheses show that family structure significantly predicts adolescent involvement in premarital sex in Nigeria. Based on the findings, it was recommended among other things that schools should educate parents aboutadolescent’s development, communication, and how their attitudes, values influence their children sexual behaviour.

Social Factors, Premarital Sex, Adolescents

1. Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What is quantitative research? | Definition, uses & methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bringula, R. P., Aviles, A. D., Batalla, M. Y. C., Borebor, M. T. F., Uy, M. a. D., & Diego, B. E. S. (2017). Factors affecting failing the programming skill examination of computing students. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 9(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2017.05.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dwiantoro, B., Sujana, Y., & Hatta, P. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in programming education and its impact on the learning process. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v9i1.103884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Farooq, U., & Anwar, S. (2024). Students motivation to learn programming: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gurer, M. D., & Tokumaci, S. (2020). Factors affecting engineering students’ achievement in computer programming. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(4), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i4.74 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, E., Munoto, M., B, I. G. P. A., & Winanti, E. T. (2019). Analysis of programming skills concept in developing problem solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 25(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i1.22638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kuo, Y., & Kuo, Y. (2025). Learning programming: exploring the relationships of self-efficacy, computational thinking, and learning performance among minority students. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1623415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, N., Albluwi, I., Becker, B. A., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A. N., Ott, L., Paterson, J., Scott, M. J., Sheard, J., & Szabo, C. (2018). Introductory programming: a systematic literature review. Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ACM ITiCSE 2018 Companion)., 55–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Misa. (2025, July 2). Significance of Quantitative Research : 9 Essential insights. Researchmate.net. https://researchmate.net/quantitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sitompul, S. S., Kustono, D., Suhartadi, S., & Setyaningsih, R. M. (2017). The relationship of the learning of tourism marketing, hard skills, soft skills and working quality of the graduates of Tourism Academy in Medan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i4p124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sweller, J. (1988b). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Watson, M. (2024, October 11). Job prospects for programmers in the Philippines. Full Scale. https://fullscale.io/blog/job-prospects-for-programmers-in-the-philippines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Stress and Test Anxiety on Academic Achievement of Science Education Students in Adamawa State University, Mubi
• Informational Support on Marital Satisfaction of Protestant Clergy and Their Spouses in Dagoretti South Sub-County Nairobi, Kenya
• Career Maturity among UniSZA Students
• Career Self-Efficacy among UniSZA Students
• Relationship Between Self-Esteem, Burnout, and Psychological Well-Being among Guidance and Counselling Teachers