Technical Skills of Design and Technology Teachers

Authors

Nurul Amira Mohd Shah

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Hanifah Jambari

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Jamilah Ahmad

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Nur Hazirah Noh@Seth

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Nurul Aini Mohd Ahyan

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Mohamad Rasidi Pairan

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400016

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 245-251

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-26

Accepted: 2026-03-31

Published: 2026-04-24

Abstract

Technical skills involve the knowledge and mastery of a particular field especially in areas that deal with methods, process, procedures and techniques. This research was carried out to determine the degree of; knowledge, skills, and constraints of the teachers in the subject of Technical Skills in Design and Technology, Electrical and Electronics. A quantitative survey was the research methodology that was adopted in this study. The sample size of this study was 160 teachers of secondary schools in the southern region of Malaysia. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions in a 5-point Likert scale. The suitability of the questionnaire developed was identified by carrying out a pilot study. The findings of the pilot study revealed that the reliability that was derived out of the Alpha value of Cronbach was 0.94. The Statistical Package of the Social Sciences was used to analyse the data and provide the frequency, percentage, standard deviation and mean scores value. The results revealed that the level of mean is high in all the variables with the level of knowledge of the teachers having a mean of 3.86 and a standard deviation of 0.95, the level of technical skills of the teachers having a mean of 3.87 and a standard deviation of 0.98 and the constraint the Design and Technology (RBT) teachers face having a mean of 4.82 and a standard deviation of 0.40. The overall findings are that Technical Skills with the Design and Technology subject in the Electrical and Electronics subtopic is at high level with a mean score of 4.82 and standard deviation of 0.40. This implies that teachers have good background knowledge in Electrical and Electronics subtopic, but they might be having challenges in implementing the knowledge to practical context because of some limitations.

Keywords

Abilities, Technology, Knowledge, Electricity

Downloads

References

1. Ahmad, M. F., Mohamad, M. F., Mohamed, N. B., & Omar, Z. (2019). Development of electrical and electronic module based on design thinking for engineering education. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 1640–1650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arihasnida Ariffin (2020). Pembangunan Bahan E-pembelajaran Berasaskan Model Needham Lima Fasa bagi Topik Konkrit. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/6177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arihasnida Ariffin (2021). Hubungan Antara Sikap Pelajar dengan Tahap Tekanan Guru Program Pendidikan Inklusif dalam Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/6178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azizi, M. I. (2019). Amalan pedagogi guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi berdasarkan model reka bentuk pengajaran ASSURE di sekolah menengah (Master’s thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bullock, D. L. (2015). The missing middle: Effects of teacher job satisfaction and working conditions on student outcomes. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 273–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2009). Creative teaching for creative students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 253–264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Endot, Z., Jamaluddin, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F. and Mohd Puad, M. H. (2021). Teacher readiness in implementing the teaching of design and technology and its relationship with self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(4S), 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fowler, F. J., Jr. (2021). Survey research methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2020). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ibrahim, M. R., & Zulkifli, N. (2021). The Role of Practical Training in Enhancing Electrical and Electronic Education. Malaysian Journal of Technical Education, 15(1), 77-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibrahim, S., & Zainal, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Practical-Based Learning in Electricity and Electronics Education. Malaysian Journal of Education Research, 14(2), 123-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ismail, M. R., & Tan, S. Y. (2021). Developing Scales for Measuring Teacher Readiness in Electrical and Electronics Education. Asian Journal of Educational Studies, 20(1), 33-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International STEM Journal. (2024). Addressing Challenges in Design and Technology (Rekabentuk Teknologi-RBT) Subject: A Case Study on Enhancing Knowledge and Technical Skills. International STEM Journal, 5(2), 84-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kamariah Rubani (2017). Persepsi Guru Pelatih Terhadap Perlaksanaan Serentak Sistem Sijil Kemahiran Malaysia di UTHM. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. KPM. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. KPM. (2016). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lucas, B. (2016). The five dimensional model of creativity. Education Endowment Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nor, M. Z., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Challenges in Teaching Electrical and Electronics Education. Asian Journal of Technical Education, 17(4), 45-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Norazizah Abdullah & Dr Azita Ali (2019). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Pelatih Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi Terhadap Pengajaran Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Normah (2020). Efikasi kendiri, Kemahiran Employabiliti dan Pemilihan Kerjaya dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kolej Vokasional. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/6256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nur Nadiah Ismail (2019). The Tendency Of Co-Curriculum Students Towards Entrepreneurship Careers At Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/5094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahman, H., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). The Use of Questionnaires to Assess Teacher Competency in Technical Subjects. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 18(3), 45-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles