Sustainable Environmental Tourism Practices and their Relationship with Tourist Satisfaction in Geotourism Areas in Bohol

Authors

Resalyn T. Lagura

Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, Zamora, Bilar, Bohol (Philippines)

Heart Evanne A. Mejor

Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, Zamora, Bilar, Bohol (Philippines)

Carolyn B. Rabago

Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, Zamora, Bilar, Bohol (Philippines)

Hersheylou M. Cabig

Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, Zamora, Bilar, Bohol (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400136

Subject Category: Hospitality and Tourism

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 1770-1776

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-06

Accepted: 2026-04-12

Published: 2026-04-30

Abstract

This study assessed the sustainable environmental tourism practices and their relationship with tourist satisfaction in geotourism areas in Bohol, Philippines. Specifically, it examined sustainability practices in three dimensions—solid waste management, water conservation, and energy efficiency—and evaluated tourist satisfaction through service quality and physical environment. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 300 tourists visiting four geotourism sites: Can-umantad Falls (Candijay), Cabagnow Cave Pool (Anda), Hinagdanan Cave (Dauis), and Pahangog Twin Falls (Dimiao). Results showed that tourists perceived sustainable practices at a high level (grand mean = 3.60), with solid waste management rated highest and energy efficiency lowest. Tourist satisfaction was also notably high (grand mean = 3.47), driven primarily by staff hospitality and site safety. A significant positive relationship was found between sustainable environmental tourism practices and tourist satisfaction (r = 0.459, p < .001), although the R² of 0.211 indicated that sustainability practices accounted for 21.1% of variance in satisfaction. Age and civil status significantly predicted both sustainability perception and satisfaction, while educational attainment was the only variable showing a significant difference in satisfaction levels. The study recommends stronger visibility of energy-saving measures, improved enforcement of conservation policies, and continued investment in hospitality and comfort infrastructure. The modest R² highlights the multi-dimensional nature of tourist satisfaction and calls for future multi-predictor models. Limitations include the reliance on convenience sampling and self-reported data; future research should employ probability sampling, expanded multi-destination scopes, and mixed-methods designs to strengthen generalizability and causal inference.

Keywords

geotourism, sustainable tourism, tourist satisfaction, Bohol, environmental practices

Downloads

References

1. Amerta, I. M. S., Sara, I. M., & Bagiada, K. (2018). Sustainable tourism development. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(2), 248–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Castillo, R. (2022). Educational influences on environmental awareness among travelers. Journal of Tourism Development Studies, 11(2), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Costa, J., Rodrigues, D., & Gomes, J. (2019). Sustainability of tourism destinations and the importance of certification. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 11(6), 677–684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. De Vera, F. (2020). Universality of environmental cues in tourism settings. Journal of Visitor Behavior, 7(1), 33–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dowling, R. (2013). Global geotourism – An emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 59–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ferrer, S., & Alonzo, P. (2021). Universality of visible sustainability practices in tourism. Environmental Awareness Journal, 5(1), 40–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Garcia, L., & Santos, F. (2020). Waste management visibility and its influence on tourist perceptions. Philippine Journal of Tourism & Ecology, 7(1), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hadassa, E. (2024). Impact of sustainable tourism practices on tourist satisfaction in ecotourism destinations in Kenya. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 4, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hossain, Md. S., Mostafa, Md. G., & Hossain, Md. (2021). Modeling tourists' satisfaction in the nature-based tourist destination using structural equation modeling. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 37, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A., Sanchez-Fernandez, R., & Jimenez-Castillo, D. (2016). Sustainability, value, and satisfaction: Model testing and cross-validation in tourist destinations. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4803–4811. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lozano, T., & Javier, M. (2021). Sustainability measures and their effect on emotional satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Tourism, 15(2), 118–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Reyes, S., & Villarin, A. (2021). Educational influences on visitors' evaluation of nature-based attractions. Eco-Tourism Academic Review, 7(2), 52–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sarmiento, A., & Feliciano, J. (2021). Multidimensional factors shaping tourist satisfaction. Integrated Tourism Behavior Journal, 6(1), 26–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shamim, N. M., Ismail, A. N. N., Rosely, N., & Abdullah Thani, A. K. (2024). The impact of ecological sustainability on tourists' satisfaction and revisit intention: A case study in Langkawi, Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharmili, K., & Kannan, V. (2020). Sustenance of biodiversity: An action line through viable approaches. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(7), 239–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Velasco, R. (2022). Tourist awareness of behind-the-scenes sustainability practices. Eco-Management & Tourism Review, 11(2), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Villoria, J., & Santos, B. (2021). Age-based evaluation of environmental practices in ecotourism. Tourism Psychology & Sustainability, 8(2), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles