Evaluating Equity and Governance Gaps in Distribution of Micro-Irrigation Technology Subsidy: Evidence from Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh

Context: Demand for micro-irrigation (MI) technologies has increased in semi-arid agricultural areas due to water scarcity, but the spread of such technologies promoted through government subsidy schemes has often been compromised by poor governance and elite capture, with the most vulnerable farmers failing to benefit.
Objectives: This paper examines awareness levels, identification of beneficiaries, impact on use and the estimation of leakages among state government-subsidized Micro-Irrigation System (MIS) schemes in Palnadu District of Andhra Pradesh, India.
Methods: The primary data were collected from 145 farmers belonging to 4 villages in Macherla mandal through a structured schedule and the data was analysed with the help of χ2 tests.
Key Results: However, 60.42% of applications were approved, and implementation was highly unequal. Delays in subsidies were reported in 46.55% of the cases, field verification was insufficient in 66.21%, and elite capture was noted in 50.34% of the recipients. Tenant farmers were excluded at a rate of 54.48%, and collusion between contractors, government officials and beneficiaries was found in 64.14% of cases. Education was a significant predictor of scheme awareness (χ² (df) =11.24, p=0.024), and self-exclusion — rather than formal discrimination on the basis of land size — was one of the major barriers to access. Among the respondents who actually benefited (n = 26), a total of 89.66% reported water savings of 30–50%.
Implications: To promote more equitable irrigation development there is a need for direct and transparent beneficiary selection, strong field monitoring, affirmative action for small and marginal farmers and protection of scheme administration from political interference.

Micro-irrigation subsidies, elite capture, governance failures, beneficiary identification, political economy, water-saving technologies, agricultural equity, Andhra Pradesh

1. Anderson, J. R. (2011). Agricultural advisory services. Background paper for the World Development Report 2008. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6807-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, J. R., & Birner, R. (2020). Advancing agricultural extension and advisory services: Learnings from international experience. In P. Gonsalves (Ed.), Agricultural extension reforms in South Asia (pp. 45–78). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818752-4.00003-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Archana, A., & Suthacini, V. (2024). A study on micro irrigation technology adoption in Dindigul. ShodhKosh: Journal of Arts and Commerce, 5(6), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.6024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ankalam, B. (2020). A comparative economic analysis of micro-irrigation and conventional irrigation: Costs and returns in Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(3), 985–996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ankalam, B. (2023). Impact of micro-irrigation system technology on farm economy in Andhra Pradesh. Roshan Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ankalam, B. (2023). Trends in paddy cultivation with reference to Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 10(11), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i2.101138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ankalam, B. (2022). Impact of micro irrigation technology on food security in Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Economic Journal, Special Issue(1), 112–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deshpande, A. (2011). The grammar of caste: Economic discrimination in contemporary India. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/451461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Microeconomics of technology adoption. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kishore, P., Chand, S., & Srivastava, S. K. (2023). Potential area of micro-irrigation and its outreach across Indian states. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i2.101138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kiruthika, S., & Suresh Kumar, D. (2020). Socio-economic impacts of MIS adoption in Coimbatore district. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 12(3), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v12i3.2312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mallam, A., & Ankalam, B. (2023). Status of micro irrigation technology in Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 10(11), c308–c312. https://doi.org/10.56975/jetir.v10i11.527828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mohan, G., Prasad, A. S. R., Singh, R., & Kumar, S. (2024). Assessing determinants, challenges and perceptions to adopting water-saving technologies in semi-arid India. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 7, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shanthasheela, M. (2025). Barriers on adoption of micro irrigation by farmers in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Extension Journal, 9(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-8623.2025.00012.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Singh, G., & Gandhi, V. P. (2023). Enhancing the adoption of water saving technologies in India's agriculture: Determinants across states. Water Economics and Policy, 9(3), 2350008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X23500084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Swanson, B. E., & Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8231-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Thorat, S., & Neuman, K. S. (2012). Blocked by caste: Economic discrimination in modern India. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198073475.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yadav, A., & Deshmukh, M. K. (2025). A study on factors affecting the adoption of drip irrigation. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, 9(12S), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i12Sf.6549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yadav, K., Yadav, J. P., Yadav, S., & Asha, K. (2018). Association between constraints encountered by farmers in adoption of drip irrigation and their independent variables. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 54(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-0745.2018.00057.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria