Exploring the Effects of Remote Work on Staff Performance. A Study of Selected NGOs in Abuja

This study examines the issue of remote working and its impact on the performance of staff in the COVID-19 pandemic and the selected non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Abuja, Nigeria. The study takes the form of a descriptive survey with a structured questionnaire to 50 employees that had had a remote work experience. Simple percentages and mean scores were used to analyze data. The results showed that remote work had significant advantages, such as lower transportation expenses, closer contact with family, better flexibility, and perceived job performance improvement. Nevertheless, the work also singles out such challenges as higher operational expenses incurred by employees (e. internet and electricity), less interaction among staff members and greater risk of information security. The findings also reveal that employees mostly used communication platforms including email, phone calls, and WhatsApp to keep the work flowing during the remote operations. Although the results are both positive and negative, the study concludes that remote work has the potential of positively impacting employee performance provided there are proper infrastructure, organizational policies and incentives in place. It highlights the importance of employers to offer financial and technological assistance to reduce the risks of remote working, especially in developing economies with infrastructural constraints. The research is an addition to the expanding literature on flexible work arrangement by emphasizing the contextual realities that determine the efficacy of remote work in Nigeria.

Remote work, employee performance, COVID-19, NGOs

1. Abdulsalam, D., and Mawoli, M. A. (2012). Motivation and job performance of academic staff of state universities in Nigeria: the case of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State. International Journal of Business and management, 7(14), 142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyemo, D.A. (2000). Job involvement, career commitment, organizational commitment and job Satisfaction of the Nigerian Police. A multiple regression analysis. Journal of AdvanceStudies in Educational Management, 5(6):35-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afrianty, T. W., Artatanaya, I. G., and Burgess, J. (2021). Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ajila, C. O. (1997). Job motivation and attitude to work as correlates of productivity among workers in manufacturing companies in Lagos State, Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Dissertation). OAU Ile-Ife Osun State, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ajila, C., and Abiola, A. (2004). Influence of rewards on workers performance in an organization. Journal of social sciences, 8(1), 7-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ajzen, I. (2005).Attitudes, personality and behavior. Maidenhead etc.: Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26, 9, 1113-1127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., and Shockley, K.M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol. Sci. Public Interes, 16, 40–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Andam K, Edeh H, Oboh V, Pauw K, Thurlow J. Impacts of COVID-19 on food systems and poverty in Nigeria. Advances in Food Security and Sustainability. 2020;5:145-173. doi:10.1016/bs.af2s.2020.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arntz, M., Sarra,B. Y. and Berlingieri, F. (2019). Working from home: heterogeneous effects on hours worked and wages.Available at: 10.2139/ssrn.3383408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bloom, N., 2020. How working from home works out. Stanford Institute for economic policy research, 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lain, J., Vishwanath, T., (2021) https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2021/11/24/the-covid-19-crisis-isnt-over-for-workers-in-nigeria/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bryman, A., 2016. Social research methods. Oxford university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bulińska-Stangrecka, H., and Bagieńska, A. (2021). The role of employee relations in shaping job satisfaction as an element promoting positive mental health at work in the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Caulfield, B. and Charly, A., 2022. Examining the potential environmental and travel time saved benefits of remote working hubs. Transport Policy, 127, pp.139-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Centre for Health Protection (2020). Frequently asked questions on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Accessed 9 June. https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/features/102624.html#F [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chung, H., Seo, H., Forbes, S., and Birkett, H. (2020). Working from home during the COVID-19 lockdown: Changing preferences and the future of work. Available at: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/business/research/wirc/epp-working-from-home-COVID-19-lockdown.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, 3rd edition, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. David, K. and Golan, C. (2017). the mediating effect of interpersonal trust on virtual team’s collaboration. Int. J. Knowl. Manag, 13, 20–37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L. and Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand. J. Prod. Innov. Manag, 35, 125–146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. De Vos, A., and Meganck, A. (2009). What HR managers do versus what employees value: Exploring both parties' views on retention management from a psychological contract perspective. Personnel Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Delanoeije, J. and Verbruggen, M. (2020) Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 29 (6): 795–808. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Dimotakis, N., Scott, B.A., and Koopman, J. (2010). An experience sampling investigation of workplace interactions, affective states, and employee well-being. J. Organ. Behav, 32, 572–588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Eddleston, K. A., and Mulki, J. (2017). Toward understanding remote workers’ management of work–family boundaries: the complexity of workplace embeddedness.Group & Organization Management 42 (3): 346–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gajendran, R.S., 2025. Is working remotely counterproductive? Forging connections between counterproductive work behavior and remote work. Handbook of Counterproductive Work Behavior, pp.336-352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gashi, A., Kutllovci, E. and Zhushi, G., 2022. E-work evaluation through work–life balance, job effectiveness, organizational trust and flexibility: Evidence from Kosovo during COVID-19. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), pp.371-385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gohoungodji, P., N’Dri, A.B. and Matos, A.L.B., 2023. What makes telework work? Evidence of success factors across two decades of empirical research: a systematic and critical review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), pp.605-649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gómez, S.M., Mendoza, O.E.O., Ramírez, J. and Olivas-Luján, M.R. (2020). Stress and myths related to the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on remote work. Manag. Res. J. Iberoam. Acad. Manag, 18, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Gorjifard, R. and Crawford, J., 2021. Working from home: Impact on wellbeing and work-life balance. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 46(2), pp.64-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., Spurgeon, P. C., Tramontano, C. and Charalampous, M. (2019). Construction and initial validation of the e-work life scale to measure remote e-working.Employee Relations 41 (1): 16–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Guinot, J.,and Chiva, R. (2019). Vertical trust within organizations and performance: a systematic review. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev, 18, 196–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://www.jacksonettiandedu.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19-PANDEMIC-AND-IMPACT-ON-BUSINESSES-IN-NIGERIA-NO-LONGER-BUSINESS-AS-USUAL.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jallow, H., Renukappa, S., and Suresh, S. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on United Kingdom infrastructure sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2020-0068. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jones, Y., 2022. Factors contributing to workplace isolation in remote workers. Trevecca Nazarene University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kazekami, S. (2020). Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy, 44 (2): 101868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Khin, S., and Ho, T. (2018). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177e195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., and Sułkowski, Ł. (2021). The motivation of academics in remote teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic in polish universities—Opening the debate on a new equilibrium in e-learning. Sustainability, 13(5), 2752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A. and Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behaviour and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (1), 152–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Luthans, E. (1998). Organizational behaviour. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Maylor, H. and Blackmon, K. (2005). Researching business and management: a roadmap for success. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Navarro-Abal, Y., Climent-Rodríguez, J.A., López-López, M.J., and Gómez-Salgado, J. (2018). Psychological coping with job loss. empirical study to contribute to the development of unemployed people. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 15, 1787. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ng, T.W. (2015). The incremental validity of organizational commitment, organizational trust, and organizational identification. J. Vocat. Behav. 2015, 88, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Olajide, A. (2000). Getting the best out of the employees in a developing economy. A Personnel [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Psychology Guest Lecture Series. Department of Guidance and Counselling, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pang, K. and Lu, C.S. (2018). Organizational motivation, employee job satisfaction and organizational performance. Marit. Bus. Rev, 3, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Peter Adey, Kevin Hannam, Mimi Sheller & David Tyfield (2021) Pandemic (Im)mobilities, Mobilities, 16:1, 1-19, DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2021.1872871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pinder, C.C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Yok: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Fahlevi, M., Mufid, A., Agistiawati, E., Cahyono, Y., & Suryani, P. (2020). Impact of work from home (WFH) on Indonesian teachers performance during the Covid-19 pandemic: An exploratory study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 6235-6244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Raghuvir, R., Anila, A., Ganesh, A., Jayesh, M., Krishnadas, N., COVID-19: Emergence, Spread, Possible Treatments, and Global Burden. Frontiers in Public Health. 8, 2020 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00216 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00216. 2296-2565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Raj, R., Kumar, V., Sharma, N.K., Singh, S., Mahlawat, S. and Verma, P., 2023. The study of remote working outcome and its influence on firm performance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), p.100528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rimadias, S., 2020. Factors Affecting Perceived Productivity on Teleworkers during Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Ekonomika, 12(2), pp.43-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rokeman, N.R.M., 2024. Likert measurement scale in education and social sciences: explored and explained. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), pp.77-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sakhawalkar, A., 2023. PARADIGM SHIFT IN WORKING CULTURE–A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Selvasundaram, D. K., and Dasaradhan, S. (2020). A comparative study on work from home during Covid 2019: employees perception and experiences. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 4621-4627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Shareena, P., and Shahid, M. (2020). Work from home during COVID-19: Employees perception and experiences. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 9(5), 1e3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Simons, T. and Enz, C.(1995). Motivating hotel employees. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36(1): 20–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., and Colangelo, A. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: the role of affiliative motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(4), 583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Sinval, J. and Marôco, J. (2020). Short index of job satisfaction: validity evidence from Portugal and Brazil. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Sjöberg, L.andLind, F. (1994). Work motivation in financial crisis: A study of prognostic factors. Stockholm School of Economics. Department of Economic Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Staples, S. D., Hulland, J. S., and Higgins, C. A. (2020). A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 758- 776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Tella, A., Ayeni, C. O., and Popoola, S. O. (2007). Work motivation, job satisfaction, and organisational commitment of library personnel in academic and research libraries in Oyo State, Nigeria. Library philosophy and practice, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Umesh, U. (2021). Work from home during covid-19 pandemic: employees perception and experiences. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(4), 3397-3407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Vyas, L.and Butakhieo, N. (2021). The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: an exploratory study on Hong Kong. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 59-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Yu, M. C., Mai, Q., Tsai, S. B. and Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 10, 864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria